|
A tag has been placed on Bryn Bennett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
First of all, I read your page on why you might have deleated a page, and Bryn Bennett, as far as I know, did not violate those terms. Here's what I could think of that may have been the reason. 1. little text- okay, I didn't move it yet for a reason. It's a work in progress 2. Copyright- if the picture wasn't under fair use, then you might as well delete the Bang Camaro article too (I used the same picture!) 3. not famous enoghf- he's the face of a rock band that has had songs in games like Madden 10, The Sims 3, Rock Band 2 etc. If you deleate his article, you might as well deleate the articles on all of the above mentioned games. 4.Too Bang Camaro filled- Well, it's a work in progess like I stated above. 5.Not enoghf written on him- well, you have me here... If you search all of google and you can't find anything on him, then I guess your right...
((hangon))
tag on it and immediately explain your reasons (which in this case you did not do). Once done, if you want the sub-page deleted, just place a ((db-userreq))
tag on it and a passing admin will take care of it for you.
The article Wheelie Cyberman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod))
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J.delanoygabsadds 18:07, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 7even (false Michael Jackson album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jayson (talk) 02:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
The article The Homing Beacon/The Landing Beacon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing ((dated prod))
will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArglebargleIV (talk) 15:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
It's buckethead, he's had like, one song to ever chart, but he has more than one artical on his songs. Why is MINE nominated for deleation?MarthsBullet (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated The Homing Beacon/The Landing Beacon, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Homing Beacon/The Landing Beacon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ArglebargleIV (talk) 04:52, 19 December 2009 (UTC)