|
Also, you can ask questions at the wp:teahouse!
wp:primary sources / wp:original research may be an issue as Wikipedia is not a publisher of original content. Pier-reviewed articles would be better, Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you @Jim1138:. I just wanted to clarify and reassure you that MedicineX is an academic conference at Stanford School of Medicine focused on scholarly work at the intersection of technology, design and medicine. You can read about it at and see the call for abstracts at http://medicinex.stanford.edu/call-for-presenters-2017/ Every submission is peer reviewed before being accepted. The selection criteria and selectivity is among the highest in the world, reflecting stanford's reputation and standards for scientific research. The citation that I provided as a reference was a link to the online abstract that was accepted, following peer review. If you would like, since this is my area of research and I have access to the Stanford database, I am happy to send the paper, link to the presentation, data or publication or even forward a few links online to previous presentations in years past, such as http://medicinex.stanford.edu/accepted-presentations/ under the Business Tab. You can find the listing under the title neuropsychology based behavior design through mobile gaming. Let me know if and how I may help. Thanks! MamaDoc (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi @Jim1138:, got it...thank you and I look forward to hearing from Doc James. In addition to clinical research, I am also a psychiatrist (MD) at the department of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, so happy to discuss with him and/or other contributors, who may have or seek a medical opinion. MamaDoc (talk) 06:38, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
@Jim1138: I am not so sure about making my expertise and profile public because of the type of clinical work I do. I will have to think about that but thanks for the suggestion. Also, I did not mean to suggest that I could offer medical advice via wikipedia but only to serve as a resource for editing articles pertaining to that topic, if appropriate and it can add value. I have done it in the past several times anonymously but i hope I can be of more value to this community going forward. Thanks for taking the time and for all your helpful feedback! As for the potential for research with wikipedia, i know a few colleagues on the east coast who study patterns/activity in quora, wikipedia and even other social media communities. There are specific circuits in the brain which respond to the mechanisms of such hooks/reward mechanisms in these types of services. That said, I am not an expert in those areas but happy to look at it, if helpful. My interest and focus is on neural circuits relating to decision making, habit formation, food behaviors and eating disorders, hence my edit based on the recently accepted abstract to the conference. Looking forward to being more involved with wikipedia and to your guidance as I learn this community's protocols. Do you advise that I should I wait for Doc James to respond or is there any one else I should correspond with about my previous edit? Please let me know. Thanks! MamaDoc (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Recently developed innovations have been peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at Stanford School of Medicine's MedicineX|ED conference, pertaining to methods that are a result of software based innovations through use of neuropsychology and cognitive behavior therapy. Such a digital vaccine candidate has been tested in Phase 2 trials involving children, possibly paving the way for such innovation to reduce the risk of lifestyle diseases.[1]
A digital vaccine which may reduce the risk of lifestyle diseases is undergoing phase 2 clinical trials...
References
Thanks again @Jim1138:. I have added myself to wp:WikiProject Medicine and wp:WikiProject Psychology. Excited! Also, thanks for your suggestion about removing "innovation" from my original edit to vaccine. Since you suggested that I find a reference with a direct link to an online peer reviewed abstract, I am adding a link to a previous publication by Prakash at Stanford in 2015, although the title or abstract/presentation did not frame the method as a digital vaccine, at that time. I am also adding another reference to two trials published by another group of behavioral scientists at Baylor College of Medicine (Dr Craig Johnston and Dr Jenny Moreno), which I think adds an academic group's independent findings going back to 2014. In case it helps, I can even try to find a paper by a group from Carnegie Mellon University led by Prof.Krishnan, which published a paper on the topic in the society of health informatics. However, it is my opinion that the citation to Prakash's work is relevant, as his work set the foundation for originating such a method to lifestyle disease risk reduction, going back to his peer reviewed presentation at Stanford in 2014. Would you please give me some feedback about the following revision to my original edit? Let me know what you think...thanks in advance
Recent randomized and controlled clinical studies and research based methods have been peer reviewed and accepted for presentation at Stanford School of Medicine's MedicineX|ED conference, pertaining to software based interventions that use neuropsychology and cognitive behavior therapy. One such intervention, which has been tested in Phase 2 trials involving children, has shown evidence of a vaccine candidate that reduces the risk of lifestyle diseases.[1][2][3]
Thanks! MamaDoc (talk) 09:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you @Doc James: I will not add it to the article at this point per your suggestion.
Hi MamaDoc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
((cite web))
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
((cite web))
: Explicit use of et al. in: |author=
(help)