This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Hey Liz. I was just wondering if perhaps you'd like to donate a better picture for your article? The current one seems to be a screenshot from a presentation you gave back in November 2020, and is kinda fuzzy and overexposed. If you do want to, the image would need to be licensed under a CC BY-SA, which I believe you can do at upload time over on Wikimedia Commons. If you do want to upload an image, feel free to ping me here or the talk page and I'd be more than happy to update the article for you once the image is uploaded. If you don't want to do this, no worries, just thought I'd ask :) Sideswipe9th (talk) 02:07, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
A sincere thanks for going out of your way to always explicitly point out your COI, in edit summaries and especially in discussions. I (and hopefully others also) really appreciate that, Thanks!!!! ---Avatar317(talk) 22:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Lightoil (talk) 06:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Thank you for the timely review of Draft:Onominato Shrine even though it was a decline still nice to get a quick review. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 08:56, 7 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hi @Lizthegrey, I saw what happened in Jennifer Pritzker talk page. I think when editing others' comments in a talk page, it would just be helpful to add a line to the bottom of the edited section to explain the edits you've made. I think it's confusing to see the "[misgendering]" in the middle of the sentence and not have it clarified that this was edited after the fact. This just in the interest of keeping the talk page comprehensible without resorting to the edit history. Samuelshraga (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
If you make anything more than minor changes, it is good practice to leave a short explanatory note such as "[potential libel removed by ~~~~]". Sorry about that! lizthegrey (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
In future, please don't notify an editor of a complaint at a noticeboard before you've filed the complaint. It's misleading/confusing. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for dealing with Exteahans71 again. I've had my suspicions that this was a case of COI, and this [1] doesn't help. It's moot unless they get unblocked. I'm going to look at the various articles they have created and check if there is enough information available to warrant articles. Meters (talk) 03:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)