This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
Hi. If you have a moment could you take a look at the above article? Your comments were really useful last time, and if you could give me something like that again that'd be really useful. Cheers, Apterygial talkstalkinsane idea 09:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
You said that you had read stuff related to drivers being chicane nervous at Monza. I remember reading stuff like that too, however I'm struggling to find anything now. Do you know of any sources? Apterygial 04:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Danite123 (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Hi there, I’m researching an article about Wikipedia, and its editors. I wonder if you I could talk to you about Wikipedia, and how you use it, for a magazine about not-for-profit organisations. If you could spare some time and wouldn’t mind answering some questions by email or phone, please contact me on Bennett.d@hotmail.co.uk, or leave a message here or on my talk page. Many thanks,
Daniel
Danite123 (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
is this one user or multiple ppl (talk)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
Good job today. You have been lining up AIV reports almost as fast as I can act on them. Thanks for keeping me busy. :) Trusilver 17:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks! That'll fill the hole on my userpage! Apterygial talkstalkinsane idea 22:34, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
stop being an assclown —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dav92178 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
the redirect is a fucking joke. how about leaving the serious article & not being a world class douchbag —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dav92178 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
That was actually quite heroic. -- Skarl 13:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC) |
(Livingston North alleged vandalism) I am REMOVING edits which I made to begin with so how can this be vandalism? I am not altering anyone else's input. Forthbridge (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I am not stopping anyone reposting similar 'common knowledge' information (although the article in question does contain incorrect information) - I am merely removing the content in the format I provided. *Note that I have added substantial information over the years to various pages, and within the last week have mysteriously been stopped from doing so (without logging in) therefore, I feel it is fair that my edits are removed and 'experienced' or regular contributors can replace this information with their own format should they so wish, however, it is not my intention to vandalise, nor do I feel I am doing so - for instance, my edits were seemingly acceptable a week ago yet now, I cannot add or correct edits. Forthbridge (talk) 14:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I have removed edits made by myself and have not altered anyone else's work on this page. Please could you respect my decision to remove my own wording. Having been banned from editing after several contributions, and with no intent to vandalise or distort, due to my IP address, I have decided to remove my contributions which all of a sudden are unwelcome. I am not stopping anyone adding similar common knowledge information. Forthbridge (talk) 14:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Could I then request someone looks at my contributions and re-edits them slightly? AS the edits remain in the history of the page, I feel anyone interested enough can see them, although I am not happy for them to remain as they are. And what changes I have attempted to make, short of deletion, I am unable to do due to my IP address. Forthbridge (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
As I explained, I intended to alter them as I was not happy with the compostition of my wording, retaining the pertinant information, but could not do so because of my IP address supposedly being a source of vandalism. Forthbridge (talk) 15:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
I shall attempt to make some minor edits again and see what happens! Forthbridge (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Initial edit complete. Please take time to advise on suitability or acceptability Forthbridge (talk) 15:39, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for that. I am attempting to tidy up some of my work. I see that my edits of the Intercity 125 are still extant - however my trimming of the Livingston North information has once again been reverted for some reason. I'm not sure why some things seem to get left and others changed back, as I say I feel the information is the same, but a little more concise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Forthbridge (talk • contribs) 18:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC) Forthbridge (talk) 18:33, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou Forthbridge (talk) 18:43, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
In light of your comments at the Italian GP PR, I've redrafted the Brazilian lead in my sandbox. It's probably not hugely urgent, given how fast it is moving at GAN (no. 27, up 16 places in ten days!) but before I replace it on the article page, could you let me know if it is an improvement on the existing lead? As before, the new on the top, the old on the bottom. Cheers, Apterygial 07:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as User talk:90.195.140.96, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon))
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:User talk:90.195.140.96|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 14:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Is this user spamming in a way that implicates the name? If not, I'd leave them be. At least over that. They seem to have made a fair amount of productive contributions. Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
you might to note that Ed Wyatt has never actually been head of sports of any broadcasting network. there is no evidence to back this claim. Michellecrisp (talk) 23:55, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
I was the one who made this page. The only disputed issue is weather it is connected to the Council on foreign relations or not. I am editing that part out. Everything else is not disputed. It states on the edit page that I can edit below the line!!!! how am I vandalizing anything? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffjenset (talk • contribs) 19:32, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Sir do not remove it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiddle dee eee (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Sleaves, I don't know much about editing, and don't know how to respond to your message, other than editing your page. I apologize for my information on the " Valkarye " Page. I misread informed myself. I saw that it said slated between a certain date, and Februar 2009. I didn't see that it had finnaly been set for Dec 25, and I edited the pages before I saw that. Thankyou for fixing my mistakes, & I look foreward to actually editing some correct information in the future. lol.
Thanks! ^.^—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.248.47 (talk • contribs)
I ask that you re-visit the article and advise if I have done enough to address your concern. Thanks, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
WP:OUTREACH now exists in larval stage. Please visit the talkpage to help it pupate. //roux 21:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
It IS queer. Havent you seen how they dress? Stop reverting genuine edits.-Citizen drumstick (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 13:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC).
Speedy Deletion Criterion General #4 requires that the reposted content be essentially identical to the deleted content. Where this is not the case, G4 doesn't apply. Cheers, WilyD 13:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
The film is just announced ! Thats why it is short ! Can you cancle the deletion policy on Vettaikaran.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thulasi12345 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.91.129 (talk) 19:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Hullo! How did you do the 8 reverts at once to Lee Cattermole here [1]? I'm still learning Huggle and haven't figured that one out. It was clear that more than one revert was needed, but I could only do the one because the additions were by different editors. Thanks, Geoff T C 18:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure if I'm allowed to ask this, but you seem to know your way around image policy. Brazil is currently at FAC here, and I think all we are waiting on is an image review. If you don't think it is fair me asking someone to do it, then don't, but otherwise, could you take a look at the images in the article and leave your concerns at the review page? Thanks, Apterygial 01:56, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
For far too much to mention here. For being the first to encourage me to work on an article (a can of worms), providing consistently constructive comments on the articles I do write and just doing so much of the leg work and necessary arguing for F1 articles. Apterygial 02:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC) |
Ashbey has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding ((subst:Cookie)) to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ((subst:munch))!
AshbeyHappy Holidays Ӝ 00:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
I simply moved the link. --203.221.86.177 (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Hello LeaveSleaves! I'm sorry that we fell out of touch, I was much busier in Greece than expected, what with the riots and all. Would you like to speak on IRC again soon? GlassCobra 18:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
The so called plot is not a plot it is the entire movie and will ruin the movie for everyone one. It is irresponsible to allow whet is written to remain on the site. It to too detailed and is not a plot synopsis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.237.114.85 (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |