|
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gary Oldman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. faithless (speak) 00:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gary Oldman, you will be blocked from editing. faithless (speak) 18:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at Tom Hanks. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.
Take this to Talk:Tom Hanks.
One more revert and I will asked that the article be locked, and you guys blocked. It is getting old.
IP4240207xx (talk) 09:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I wanted to let you know that I reverted you revert on the Chris Benoit article. The user's edit was clearly not vandalism. It is important not to use incorrect edit summaries, as I believe you can be blocked for this. As far as his edit goes, it appears that his edits were in line with the interests of the article, and are grammatically correct. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Sephiroth storm (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)