Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Sanctioned Suicide. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Happy Editing! -I Followed The Username Policy (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
It has just occurred to me that your username Kevinsanc might be read as Kevin (from) Sanc{tioned Suicide). If that is the case, then you should probably read the rules about conflict of interest edits. Round and rounder (talk) 21:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
((Admin help))
Could we get a cleanup on edits made on the Sanctioned Suicide talk page, it seems that someone with an IP that starts with 104. is just spamming it up and not adding any real value to it. They're posting original research that isn't sourced and what they have posted is just unsourced gossip. Kevinsanc (talk) 04:04, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
If you want to work on an article you can create a page called User:Kevinsanc/Draft. There you can work on it until you get approval to move the content to the mainspace without having to worry about it being deleted. --Trade (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Megan Twohey. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 06:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
You have recently been editing articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the ((Ctopics/aware)) template.
––FormalDude (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ––FormalDude (talk) 13:42, 12 March 2023 (UTC)