Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:58, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
AfC notification: Draft:Justyna Zander has a new comment[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Justyna Zander. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. So sorry, I did not mean to cause trouble with the templates. I was asked to provide verifiable sources to the article, which I did to the best of my knowledge. Hope, this helps. Thanks for clarifying. Justynazander (talk) 08:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rusalkii Can I ask you for some guidance? What is the next stage with this article? What other information is required? Justynazander (talk) 16:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Artem.g Seeking your guidance about this article as well. What is your suggestion as a next step? Justynazander (talk) 17:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I haven't reviewed your sources in depth, and there's a whole lot of them. Can you show me your three best three sources that (1) talk about the subject in depth (at least a couple paragraphs) (2) are completely independent from the subject and (3) are published in a reliable source (prominent newspaper, for example, not social media). Take a look at User:Rusalkii/AfC source guidance for some mistakes to avoid. I'll be happy to look over those and let you know if they pass. If sources like that don't exist, then we just don't have enough reliable independent sources to write a good article. You can take a look at WP:N for more about this.
Also, it looks like you're the subject of the article. Please note that Wikpedia is not a good place to publish a CV, promotional content, etc. Your article is not blatant self-promotion, but doing things like listing a bunch of awards without context generally makes editors a little leery. Rusalkii (talk) 18:38, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Rusalkii, Thanks for the guidance. This makes sense.
Thanks for asking. Please note: should the article subject be insufficiently covered for a Wikipedia publication, it is fine with me. The future is ahead of us. My Top 3 'independent notability' sources:
- Business Insider announcing the list of powerful engineers in 2018: please navigate to No. 30 (ref. #46)
- Elle Magazine describing Singularity University scholar and the contents of the program (in Italian) in 2009: please navigate to p. 184 (ref. #11)
Understood. For the time being, my main purpose is to study how Large Language Models fine tuning is influenced by verifiable, anonymous and non-anonymous data of Encyclopedias like Wikipedia. Interested whether/how any of my entries change the output. Thanks for your explanation on the process. It is a long-term endeavor for me. Justynazander (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Are the first and last sources available somewhere other than Google Drive? The last one (Elle Magazine) is giving me an "access denied" message, you may need to set it to public.
The Business Insider article is imo borderline; it's a couple paragraphs of coverage independent of the subject but these tend to be kind of fluffy promotional pieces. Rusalkii (talk) 21:00, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first link is available through SWE website, one needs to navigate to year 2017, open the tab, then navigate to the magazine link, and the SWE Drive link will open for you.
Wrt. the second link, correct. My understanding is that the list research was performed independently by Business Insider journalists.
The third link is now made public. It's a little similar to the German article here (ref. #9).
Thank you again, best regards. JZ. 83.25.163.29 (talk) 22:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: The contents of this article are now deleted. Justynazander (talk) 12:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello, Justynazander!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathryn Myronuk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]