Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Balmis Expedition—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Balmis Expedition. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spanish language in the Philippines, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bayano, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Islam in Panama, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Black Legend (Spain) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Extraterrestrial life shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cambalachero (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Extraterrestrial life shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your deletion is not accepted by the majority of editors. Please stop now. Thank you David J Johnson (talk) 13:05, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of largest empires, you may be blocked from editing. This source does not say that the Spanish Empire reached its maximum extent in the year 1638 on page 109, as you falsely claim. TompaDompa (talk) 13:49, 16 June 2023 (UTC) – Amended as per below. TompaDompa (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
El Imperio Hispánico, que en una de sus versiones más amplias e inclusivas, al abarcar históricamente territorios coloniales portugueses, está en el origen genealógico de la secuencia histórica que desemboca en la Comunidad Iberoamericana de Naciones y en el espacio panibérico o paniberófono, también es objeto de diferentes interpretaciones en ese sentido. Desde una perspectiva puntual y sincrónica, el Imperio de la Monarquía Católica o Hispánica [...](omitted portion of the quote underlined by me). TompaDompa (talk) 13:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of largest empires. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 20:23, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Saint Helena. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please familiarise yourself with MOS:OVERLINK. DDMS123 (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Saint Helena, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. DDMS123 (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You've edited logged out at several articles, eg New Laws and your talk page. Doug Weller talk 08:38, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Iberian Union. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please have a look at what you do. You are breaking file links. Please undo yourself and start a discussion on the article talk page. Sam Sailor 19:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
See WP:Vandalism for our use of the word. If you are sure it is vandalism, you can report it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If this behavior continues I am likely to block you. Doug Weller talk 08:41, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Doug Weller talk 11:33, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Tercer is undoing my work and my references without giving a reason why he is doing so and not responding to my messages. To top it off, I am the one being blocked. Justice please. JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (talk) 12:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were edit warring, hence the block. PhilKnight (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
NEMO CONDEMNATUS NISI AUDITUS VEL VOCATUS JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (talk) 12:53, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Duplicate request. PhilKnight (talk) 17:06, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Excuse me but he was edit warring. He was the one editing my content without giving any reason and not replying to my messages. Can you please review? PhilKnight ((unblock))
JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Accused without reviewing what happened. @Tercer erased my content and my references without giving a reason furthermore I tried to contact him without success JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (talk) 21:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please read WP:GAB and WP:EW and the messages on this page. What someone else does is not relevant regarding whether "blocked from editing from certain pages (Iberian Union) for a period of 1 week for edit warring" was justified. Johnuniq (talk) 04:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You were reverted by three editors, not one. You also have warnings about editwarring on other articles. You should consider yourself fortunate I only gave you a short block from one article. In hindsight I believe I should have done more. Doug Weller talk 06:50, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 12:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Slavery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
You are now blocked sitewide. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:45, 28 June 2023 (UTC)JoaquindeMosquerayFigueroa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have used the talk page before doing anything
Decline reason:
Have you read WP:GAB and WP:EW and the messages on this page yet? Using the talk page does not exempt you from being blocked for editwarring. That you don't understand the reasons is concerning and suggests that when the block expires your behavior is likely to continue, leading to another and much longer block, even an indefinite one. Doug Weller talk 07:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~))
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.