Hello, Jjok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 05:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 16:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you guys. Jjok 04:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• 346 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三国史記 巻二四・百済本紀第二 近肖古王、比流王第二子也。體貌奇偉、有遠識。契王薨、継位
• 368 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王二十三年春三月丁巳朔。日有食之。遣使新羅、送良馬二匹。
• 369 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王二十四年秋九月。[[Goguryeo|高句麗王斯由帥歩騎二萬、来屯雉壌。分兵侵奪民戸。王遣太子以兵徑至雉壌、急撃破之。獲五千餘級。其虜獲分賜将士。冬十一月。大閲於漢水南。旗幟皆用黄
• 369 Seven-Branched Sword Inscription 七支刀碑文 表: 泰和(太和Taihe. Emperor Fei of Jin)四年五月十六日丙午正陽造百練X七支刀出辟百兵宜供供侯王永年大吉祥. 裏: 先世以来未有此刀百濟王世X奇生聖音(or 晋)故為倭王旨造傳示後世
• 371 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王二十四年高句麗挙兵来。王聞之。伏兵於浿河上 俟其至急擊之 高句麗兵敗北 冬 王與太子帥精兵三萬 侵高句麗 攻平壤城 麗王斯由力戰拒之 中流矢死 王引軍退 移都漢山
• 372 Book of Jin 晋書 巻九・簡文帝咸安二年春正月辛丑。百済林邑王、各遣使貢方物。六月、遣使拝百済王餘句為鎮東将軍領楽浪太守
• 372 Nihon Shoki 日本書紀 巻九 神功皇后摂政五十二年秋九月丁卯朔丙子、久氐等従千熊長彦詣之。則献七枝刀一口・七子鏡一面及種種重宝。仍啓曰、臣国以西有水。源出自谷那鉄山。其邈七日行之不及。当飲是水、便取是山鉄、以永奉聖朝。乃謂孫枕流王曰、今我所通海東貴国是天所啓。是以垂天恩、割海西而賜我。由是国基永固。汝当善脩和好、聚斂土物、奉貢不絶、雖死何恨。自是後毎年相続朝貢焉。 (Kojiki 古事記 中巻 応神天皇記 亦百済国主照古王、以牡馬壱疋、牝馬壱疋、付阿知吉師以貢上〔此阿知吉師者、阿直史等之祖〕。亦貢上横刀及大鏡。又科賜百済国、若有賢人者貢上。故、受命以貢上人、名和邇吉師。即論語十巻、千字文一巻、并十一巻、付是人即貢進。〔此和爾吉師者文首等祖〕)
• 372 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王二十七年　春正月　遣使入晉朝貢
• 373 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王二十八年　春二月　遣使入晉朝貢
• 375 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 近肖古王三十年　秋七月　高句麗來攻北鄙水谷城陷之　王遣將拒之　不克　王又將大擧兵報之　以年荒不果　冬十一月　王薨　古記云　百濟開國已來　未有以文字記事　至是得博士高興　始有書記　然高興未嘗顯於他書　不知其何許人也
• 375 Nihon Shoki 日本書紀 巻九 神功皇后摂政五十五年 百済肖古王薨
• 376 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　近仇首王　一云諱須　近肖古王之子　先是　高句麗國岡王斯由　親來侵　近肖古王遣太子拒之　至半乞壤將戰　高句麗人斯紀　本百濟人　誤傷國馬蹄　懼罪奔於彼　至是還來　告太子曰　彼師雖多　皆備數疑兵而已　其驍勇唯赤旗　若先破之　其餘不攻自潰　太子從之　進撃大敗之　追奔逐北　至於水谷城之西北　將軍莫古解諫曰　嘗聞道家之言　知足不辱　知止不殆　今所得多矣　何必求多　太子善之止焉　乃積石爲表　登其上　顧左右曰　今日之後　疇克再至於此乎　其地有巖石　罅若馬蹄者　他人至今　呼爲太子馬迹　近肖古在位三十年薨　即位
• 376 Nihon Shoki 日本書紀 巻九 神功皇后摂政五十六年、百済王子貴須立為王
• 377 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　近仇首王三年　冬十月　王將兵三萬　侵高句麗平壤城　十一月　高句麗來侵
• 377 Zizhi Tongjian 資治通鑑 卷第一百四・晋紀・烈宗 太元二年春。高句麗新羅西南夷、皆遣使入貢于秦
• 379 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　近仇首王五年　春三月　遣使朝晉　其使海上遇惡風
• 382 Imperial Readings of the Taiping Era 太平御覧 巻七百八十一・四夷部二・東夷二・新羅 符堅建元十八年、新羅国王樓寒、遣使衛頭、献美女、国在百済東、其人多美髪、髪長丈餘。又曰、符堅時、新羅国王樓寒、遣使衛頭朝貢。堅曰、卿言海東之事、與古不同何也。答曰、亦猶中国時代変革、名号改易
• 383 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　近仇首王十年　夏四月　王薨
• 384 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　枕流王 近仇首王之元子　母曰阿夫人　繼父即位　秋七月　遣使入晉朝貢　九月　胡僧摩羅難自晉至　王迎之致宮内　禮敬焉　佛法始於此
• 384 Book of Jin 晋書 巻九・孝武帝大元九年七月、百済遣使来貢方物
• 385 Samguk Sagi Silla bongi 三國史記　卷第二十四　百済本紀第二　枕流王　二年　春二月　創佛寺於漢山　度僧十人　冬十一月　王薨
• 385 Nihon Shoki 日本書紀 巻九 神功皇后摂政六十五年、百濟枕流王薨。王子阿花年少。叔父辰斯奪立爲王。
• 386 Book of Jin 晋書 巻九・孝武帝大元十一年夏四月、以百済王世子餘暉、為使持節都督鎮東将軍百済王

Your edit is splendid.I sincerely congratulates it.by the way,Would you have(know) any material about van fleed report ?--Forestfarmer 15:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind to edit ja:ヴァンフリートレポート?please.--Forestfarmer 10:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East Jjok 13:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think some typo.please check this.

"dept" is the 11th line of end in "a Japan" section. It may be "depth"."bot" is the 10th line of mid in "Korean Residents in Japan" section. "were" is the 2nd line of mid "5. Claims and Counter-Claims" section.I think it may be "wire".I don't know what it is.but I think you earlier find all of the words if you searched in web brower(Ctrl+f).--Forestfarmer 07:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. The first and the second ones are corrected. The third one, "were" is correct. SK was claiming the ships that were in korea at that time (August 9, 1945). By the way, did you install spell checker of google or yahoo? It is nice. --Jjok 10:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

please specify what you are talking about. Sea of Japan naming dispute? They are references.--Jjok 03:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to the above article, please see WP:SOAP. Best, JChap2007 14:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

プロバイダーどこですか？私は昼間はIIJで休日、夜間はNIFTYです。プロバイダーが違うならIPチェックをかけてもらうようにしませんか？--Opp2 02:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you again on the RM. It looks like the Chosun Ilbo article summoned you. It is pretty fine for me and we can go ahead if they are still interested in the idea. Jjok 15:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jjok; I was hoping you might stop by the Port Hamilton page and make some comments on the naming issue there. Several authors seem to admit is the most standard name in English. Nonetheless, they are persisting in claims that "since Korea owns the islands, it should be named in Korean." Being from Korea myself, I know there are a lot of name issues that I really do care about, and I think it's important to stick to this "common usage" policy everywhere. I'd like to get some editors opinions who are interested in naming in general, but not necessarily that page. This island is a rather unnotable place that had a base on it, and always appears in that context. There are some ambiguity concerns, but these happen for several of the choices (the Korean name itself, for example) and does not currently conflict with any other articles.

I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at this page if you have time. You seem to have a lot of interest in naming issues. While I have one opinion on the name, I encourage you to read over the discussion so far and make up your mind. I want to leave this message because I think there are a few hawks who watch the article and try to "gang up" when the rest of the community might not otherwise notice a small article like this. Komdori 22:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jjok,

I noticed your comment about sockpuppets, below the voting at Talk:Dokdo#Requested Move May 2007.

FYI, there was another recent "Appleby-type" case:

• Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Etimesoy

New WP:RFCU's can be filed there, if they're related.--Endroit 14:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice and your efforts, and congratulation for FA of Japan. I remember that 75.6.X.X & 75.7.X.X were also used by Room218 though the third bite is a little bit different. Jjok 15:38, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jjok,

I noticed you left a comment on the page, but I didn't see that you had voted in the poll. I wasn't sure if this was because you simply didn't have an opinion or if it somehow slipped past. --Cheers, Komdori 13:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice and your great summarization of those survey results. My basic opinion is the current title is POV according to the documents thus it is appropriate to put the POV title tag based on the fact and to notice users that the POV title can be chosen in WP though WP is not authorizing the POV, that the Korea Times article implies, but I was not expecting for RM by doing that. By the way, new address of "Dokdo Winning Over Takeshima in Cyberspace" on reorganized Korea Times server is here. Jjok 15:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your added references to the article. But can you participate in the talk page before revising pre-existing edits and propose adding sections, etc.? All sides have been doing this and it's been productive.melonbarmonster 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• The Jomon people in the northern Island, National Museum of Japanese History.
• Minoru Yoneda, Yasuyuki Shibata, Masatoshi Morita, Masashi Hirota, Ryo Suzuki, Kazuhiro Uzawa, Naoyuki Ohshima and Yukio Dodo, Interspecies comparison of marine reservoir ages at the Kitakogane shell midden, Hokkaido, Japan, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 223-224, 2004, 376-381.
• Takashi Sakaguchi, Refuse patterning and behavioral analysis in a pinniped hunting camp in the Late Jomon Period: A case study in layer V at the Hamanaka 2 site, Rebun Island, Hokkaido, Japan, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 2007, 28-46.
• Minoru Yoneda, Ryo Suzuki, Yasuyuki Shibata, Masatoshi Morita, Tomohiro Sukegawa, Nobuo Shigehara and Takeru Akazawa, Isotopic evidence of inland-water fishing by a Jomon population excavated from the Boji site, Nagano, Japan, Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 2004, 97-107.
• The Sannai Maruyama Site-Food, Aomori Prefecture, Japan, p. 7.
• Michiko Niimi, Sea Mammal Hunting of the Jomon Culture in Hokkaido, Bulletin of the Department of Archaeology, 9 (19901228), 137-171, The University of Tokyo ISSN 02873850

for re-arranging the links...i couldnt manage to make them look nice. tySennen goroshi 19:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the references. I was looking for them. It is important that the readers can find the references even the links are dead. Please add the information of publisher, title, and date, too, when you add a reference. Jjok 20:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• (in Korean) 일빠의 역습
• (in Korean) '양상훈칼럼' 조영남씨가 친일파인가, Chosun Ilbo, 2005.04.26. (in Japanese) 【コラム】趙英男氏が親日派なのか, Chosun Ilbo, 2005/04/27. The article talking about the author of "맞아죽을 각오로 쓴 100년만의 친일선언" The columnist says "친일파는 우리나라와 일본이 싸울 때 일본 편을 드는 사람이다." "親日派は韓国と日本が戦うとき、日本の肩を持つ人だ。"
• (in Korean) ★일류 일빠.. 내가 본 여러 모습들 use like 일빠들

• yamatosniper 여기서는 꽤 오래 쓰여진 용어입니다. "일본 빠순(빠돌)이"의 축약어 w 『친일파나 친일 행위를 하는 사람』을 가리키는 말이지요.
• tjtmdeo valkyrie17cm야 정신병적 행동으로 일본을 찬양하는 사람들을 일빠(친일파)라고 욕하는것은 맞지만 너의 의견에 동의하지 않는다고 일빠(친일파)라고 욕하는것도 어느정도 니가 정신병이 있다는거 아니겠니?

• [

Thanks for uploading Image:Bigot-nichiro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Gaijin, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. The term (gaijin smash) appears to be a neologism that is not found in any reliably sourced dictionaries. The two sources that were previously cited (UrbanDictionary.com and the blog Japan Probe) are both insufficient and unreliable for the claims made. See WP:NEO. Another editor has already reverted these edits twice (thank you). J Readings 12:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Before you add uncited material to the article, please gain consensus for your changes on the article's talk page. Thank you. John Smith's (talk) 14:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Japan#Bakumatsu_to_Ishin --Jjok (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you do, then check this out. Talk:Ikuhiko_Hata#Denial_of_existence Let's discuss your changes before you break the 3RR rule and get yourself banned. Yaki-gaijin (talk) 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I spent quite some time researching Japans financial donations to the world...the info comes directly from the U.N. Website. What is wrong? --Jjk82 (talk) 06:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

see Talk:Japan#Economy_section--Jjok (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris, I think her actual name is Ran (蘭, orchid) or Mei (in the amine Kazemakase: Tsukikage Ran). Please reconfirm her name.--Jjok (talk) 16:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, the lady's name whom I know personally is Kazemake, please do not mistake her for the anime itself. She knows her own name, as I do. Chris (クリス) (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Dog meat. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Even though your contributions seem not pleasant to Koreans, I had thought you at least tried to stick to original references, but you don't. In accordance with your contributions on Korean related articles such as Prostitution in South Korea, dog meat section at Korean cuisine, Comfort women etc, you seem to read Korean language. However, you appear to be not much knowledgeable of Korean cuisine due to your falsification on the duruchigi and jeongol at the dog meat article. So I recommend you to read Korean cuisine articles over the web to learn how Korean cuisine terms are used. You have some good knowledge of Japanese cuisine, so can get the new information quickly. And please don't introduce false information to Wikipedia because this is encyclopedia. Thanks.--Appletrees (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I was also considering to use the general cuisine terms when I was editing based on Prof. Ahn's site. I added 'gae-' to clarify that they are dog meat-jeongol and dog meat-duruchigi. If you know other appropriate names for those dog meat based dishes, please feel free to change them. According to Prof. Ahn, there is a Dogmeat hamburger restaurant in Korea (see the citation) while I am not sure it/they still exist while it is not very important since the reference describes so. About other articles, I do not have your points at all. At least I think I never edited dog meat section at Korean cuisine, did I? The other articles, I am always just summarizing the cited references and I have no idea which of my edits you are talking about.--Jjok (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You certainly didn't edit "with the account" but suddenly appeared in the middle of the discussion out of nowhere. I don't know why you called your account with "the conspicuous name". The Prof, Ahn is regarded as "별종" (peculiar geek or otaku) in South Korea. The reference is not reliable or widely accepted as a well written resource at all. The individual's eager to try making "new" kinds of food doesn't prove your claim. Well, you didn't put the prefix "gae" to the dishes which leads false info. And I looked through the past history of the dog meat and others in which you've engaged, you inserted popular dishes at the Korean section which is a blatant lie. If dog hambouger exists in South Korea, it might be published as a "weird" topic.

Regarding your claims on the edit summary, you don't always summarize your edit when to make controversial articles. The prostitution in South Korea article, you added "Kisaeng diplomacy" with a bogus citation long time ago. If you left kind menos at the edit field, I wouldn't waste my time so much to confirm who inserted that unconfirmed allegation.--Appletrees (talk) 02:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The administrator is the same checkuer who looked into my two reports, so your alarming for the report seems really usful (oh, really).--Appletrees (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The notes are just for convenience. I appreciate you to give us an opportunity to show that most of Pro-Japanese editors are not apparent socks. The results will be useful in the future cases. For next, you may need to doubt the existence of government-assisted massive Japanese lobbying organizations such as VANK (while it seems only one editor is actually causing edit-wars with you). P.S. Do you realized that there are two different providers, ODN and OCN?--Jjok (talk) 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, 2channel people pointed out on the same matter. Your and Nightshadow28's comment on that really help me alot.--16:13, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I fix your wrong usage of the term. Did you born before 1930s or 1920s in Korea, and then betrayed Korea to aid the Japanese government? If so, you're chinilpa, but you're a Japanese and I don't think you're that old. Don't introduce "false information." to people. What is VANK? what is the lobbying conspiracy? Please don't exaggerate the case to unconfirmed case.

That results say "inconclusive" not "unrelated" on you and many people. As you already saw, the checkuser suggested me to make a narrow-downed file on you and your people for the next time. So don't worry about it. Do you mean "there" refers to Japan? I didn't think that the listed people is just one editor just like Endroit's file. --Appletrees (talk) 19:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinil is not a historical term at all but a fundamental and important aspect in current Korean society. You may also have heard a term neo-chinilpa (신친일파).[1] I summarized the modern references in the Talk:Chinilpa. A chief editor in politics of Chosun Ilbo defines chinilpa as "친일파는 우리나라와 일본이 싸울 때 일본 편을 드는 사람이다,"[2] and I never find any cases that chinil acts is allowable in the society. Anti-chinil is a definitely rightful thing and frequently used to rationalize people's acts, such as you filed many chinil editors who did not seem having any connections to the edit wars, while you may be not aware by yourself. It is also apparent from your careless revert based on who edited rather than what was edited (you can clearly see in my edit summary as "rm a duplication").[3]--Jjok (talk) 21:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chinil is a histroical term, and you appear to be not much knowledgeable of Korean society, and history. (sigh). The references you provide are all speaking about "Koreans" doing for pro-Japanese activities. If someone who knows well about Japanese culture or society and contribute to Korean society in a good way, he or she is called "Jiilpa" (지일파 知日派). They advocate goodness of Japanese things to Korea. Their activities are regarded as good effect for the both countries. But chinila only indicates people who are doing against Korea for their sake, just like Oh Seon Hwa (오선화). Are you residing in Korean now? And you're keeping saying false info. No, I encountered Koonjlee and his is trusted editor in Korean cuisine articles. I reverted it with much care. Because jeongol is one of stew dishes, and you has been adding something controversial to Korean related articles. --Appletrees (talk) 21:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am grad that we now share recognition that we are not necessary to be born before 1930 to be recognized as chinilpa. As you mentioned, "Koreans doing for pro-Japanese activities" can be designated as chinilpa and criticized even they were born after 1930. As you mentioned, people use Jiilpa to avoid to be recognized as chinilpa and it reflects the view on "pro-Japan" in the society you belong. It is bad bad thing. As we can learn from Cho Youngnam's case, visiting yasukuni shrine is enough reason to be designated as chinilpa and criticized. Politicians who do not enough criticize Japan about the past can be criticized as chinilpa[4][5] because people think they are siding with Japanese as Chosun Ilbo pointed out. People can be designated as chinilpa anytime when they behave like pro-Japan. It is not necessary to be political or historical as Chosun Ilbo pointed out. Cho Youngnam knows who people can be recognized when they side with Japanese soccer team in Korea.[6]--Jjok (talk) 23:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for chinilpa again, I don't know why you so fond of keeping calling yourself as chinilpa? --Appletrees (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your assumption doesn't add up. So please enlighten me.

you may need to doubt the existence of government-assisted massive Japanese lobbying organizations such as VANK (while it seems only one editor is actually causing edit-wars with you)

• Question 1.

I googled vank and the official website says "한국바로알리기 민간기획단" on the site below which seems just ordinary website related to Korea. And it looks like a private organization because of the internet domain (Every governmental site has "go.ko" in the adress). Are you saying that the site is operated by Korean government?

• Question 2.

If my understanding is right, are you implying that the odn ip users who belong to some Japanese lobbist site just like VANK deliberately caused edit wars with me????

These assumption sound weird, so I asked you why you wrote it like that? Thanks.--Appletrees (talk) 19:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The relation between imperial household and Baekjae of Japan is being discussed. I hope for your opinion. [7]--Princesunta (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo of Yakiniku has insufficient information on the image, and 221.190.251.169 (talk · contribs)(ocn.ne.jp) raised the issue first[8]. We don't know whether it was really taken by you due to lack of information. It seems to be taken in any English-speaking world, especially North America, but I'm not sure of it. You generally stick to sourcing, so please provide info. The matter has been discussed in commons, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Korean-style BBQ.JPG Thanks. --Appletrees (talk) 16:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at Manacpowers , you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, racially motivated edits, such as those you made to Prostitution in South Korea, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --Appletrees (talk) 16:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So where exactly is the "personal attack", Appletrees? If this is it, "the miracle of hangang" doesn't seem to be a personal attack. I got 1700 Google hits for "miracle of hangang".--Endroit (talk) 17:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Endroit, now you become a representative diplomat of Jjok or any Japanese from 2channel? The content dispute is not the reason why I reported him. What I strongly feel offended by Jjok is that he dared to compares the prostitution with the praise for South Korean archievment. You should've searched "Miracle of Han River with prostitution, can you find any? You always bring weird logics or false example just like your wonderful allegation last time. --Appletrees (talk) 17:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Putting aside your snide remarks, Appletrees... Comparing "prostitution with the praise for South Korean archievment" may seem to be a rude comment for you. But it does NOT constitute personal attack against Manacpowers (talk · contribs).--Endroit (talk) 18:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It DOES constitute Personal attack to not only Manacpowers but also Koreans because Jjok really intended so at the summary. If you want to be so related to the mockery, I tell you again, that is an personal attack no matter how you defend for Jjok. --Appletrees (talk) 19:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Jjok, you are being discussed at WP:AN/I here.--Endroit (talk) 17:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As per our archived discussion at WP:AN/I here, I have initiated WP:DR in the respective talk pages as follows:

• Talk:Prostitution in South Korea#WP:NPOV violations / "Prostitution for tourists during the 1970s"
• Talk:Gimbap#The origin of Gimbap

Please continue discussion there.--Endroit (talk) 18:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your good work on Toyoko Tokiwa. Please continue!

One question, a couple of comments:

Yokohama zaijū no shashinka Tokiwa Toyoko san does indeed look like a newspaper article. But how do you know that it's from 毎日新聞? I don't notice this information anywhere. (I am sleepy though.)

I have mixed feelings about red links. If they encourage writers to create articles, fine. But they are hideous. Therefore I don't add them (and I actually subtract them) if I don't think an article is likely any time soon.

Incidentally, a month or so ago 日本カメラ (or maybe アサヒカメラ) had a little feature on 笹本恒子, now in her nineties and still taking photographs. She deserves a decent article, but I can't afford the time in the next few weeks. -- Hoary (talk) 02:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I googled the text[9] which lead me to several links including Mainichi Shimbun's dead link[10] and cache of Fresheye[11]. I think it will be more verifiable to locate the (possibly) printed materials than just linking to websites. By the way, hpdesign.jp is not Hewlett Packard but a web designing company (an abbreviation of home page design, I guess) in Yokohama, 朝倉デザイン工房.

Talking about the red links, it is convenient for me to emphasize/identify proper names/terms and sometimes it actually prompts me.

I am not familiar with photographers at all and can only add some bios which are available online. I think you can get far better helps by consulting people such as ja:利用者:20世紀(前半)美術 (User:20th Century (Zenhan) Art) who still seems active in jawp (I just noticed that you have already been reactivating the connection with Zenhan san). Good luck!--Jjok (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Well, I'll stop deleting redlinks then (though I shan't rush to add them).

Yes, "Hewlett Packard" was a stupid mistake. (i) "hp", + (ii) top page shows computers, + (iii) brain not wide awake =

I don't think that Zenhan likes writing in English, but I might try. -- Hoary (talk) 04:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that "Hewlett Packard" thing prompted me to look into the source and search the original. It was a nice eye catch (^^).

Since it will be hardly happening for me to start new enwp article, you can delete red links if you think useless. Since I am a red-link yielding machine (see this article), maybe somebody better stop me.

Even Zenhan san don't like writing in English, it may prompt jawp community to enrich ja articles such as starting ja:常盤とよ子 by translating and adding to enwp contents that will be used to enrich en articles in return.--Jjok (talk) 05:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for persevering, Jjok. I've just emerged from the shower to discover that Takako Tokiwa and Ken Domon have both sprung "infoboxes" (not your doing, of course!), which does not make me happy. I'd better head off to Doutor to get a まぐろチーズ sandwich and an espresso. (Oh yes, and I have plenty of non-WP stuff to do.) -- Hoary (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

上野 is of course Ueno, but how about the 初雄 part of the name 上野初雄 (author of a web page cited in Toyoko Tokiwa)? (Japanese names are such a pain. The moment I assume "Ueno", I expect that somebody will point out that no, for this particular person it's "Kamino" or something else.) -- Hoary (talk) 23:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was also wondering about it and couldn't get good answer for 上野初雄+教育長+横浜+うえの, so I asked the board of education and got a reply that his reading is Hatsuo Ueno as expected. I know it's text book OR but don't mention it.--Jjok (talk) 09:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

00:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on File:Diaoyutai senkaku.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]