This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
I like to keep things all on one page... :) --Yellow1996 (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
ey, i'm the guy you reverted 5 edits from rivertone's page. So, what's happening boy! you send an Irish cat, & my gift of words you removed? do you put it under vandalisation? aye, you remember last time you helped anyone on street? no? don't you think it's time check the streets regularly? your London street needs you. try building some of cameroon's policies, what will you achieve sending this 'rivertorch' with picture of irish cat? oh man, i think you've got nice place to wander around. so, utilize it. not all people are that lucky as you. you've got whole world around you, if you just change to a more freindly way in real world. hope for the best. that's all i wanted to say. the choice is yours. & hey, don't hesitate at all. life isn't about not doing wrong. say hello to dad & mom from my side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.16.157 (talk) 00:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
looks like you're too busy in homosexual activity to recognise a english written para. when are you going to become a parent? you smooch your boyfriend or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.17.82 (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.22.52 (talk) 23:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
if you had time sometime, see the video, & then do watch the comments. they are so amazing comments out there, that they sould be awarded best comments in single video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nmqBvWeFl4
yeah, that's why all those comments deserves to be there. now, the new comments are not very extreme, but the old one's were amazing(1 day old) from right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.22.134 (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
that's why i said "yeah". i didn't said "no", either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.29.14 (talk) 14:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
so, would you like to tell me why do you transformed yourself from male to gay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.18.197 (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
not at all! a real man is always atracted to a woman ¬hing else. he's very eager to shwo "only a female" how manly he is, & prove himself! satisfying a lady is the only verification & proof that you're a man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.17.203 (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
you have a good ability to turn topics, but that doesn't make you a man, besides, i don't see a women as an "item" so, i'll just say, you also knew that i do not think that way, just for the sake of turning your talk, you wrote that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.19.11 (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
You are hereby requested to never edit my user talk page again. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
lol, amazing man! one more support for you from my side, Nathan Johnson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.17.203 (talk) 01:10, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
THe article is a GA nominee. I initially had reviewed the article, but since the article involves some technicalities, it would be helpful if you further review this article as you have a better expertise on dealing with the subject. Suri 100 (talk) 05:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for having a look at the New Brighton Tower article, I worked hard on that! Cheers, ツStacey (talk) 09:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
You wrote "Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus." See here:WP is NOT a democracy. Consensus is not required. We editors are pretty much free to edit as we wish and see the need. We do not have to agree with mergers et al. Have a great day.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 22:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I removed them from the infobox, in order for the template to have a similar layout to the Infobox automobile template documentation, which does not recommend including valve numbers, power levels or commercial designations of the engines there. (Also the letter "L", instead of "-litre".) It's true that it now shows the three diesel engines with the same description and, following the same conventions, it should be corrected to display only one. The more detailed information about the engines is found in the engines section, located a little below within the article, which can easily be accessed from the table of contents. I think that all the infoboxes should generally use the same layout and the reference for that is the template documentation. Regards, BaboneCar (talk) 11:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
You are economically left, socially libertarian, anti-religion... and support the Tories???? --Orange Mike | Talk 18:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doctor Who Nightmare In Silver title card.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:50, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Some time ago you participated in a dispute resolution discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 53#LGBT rights. I have just opened an RFC on the same content issues at Talk:LGBT rights under international law#Duplicated text on countries' obligations under international law. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:30, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You really need to take a step back from the C4M page, as it is clear that your edits are not independent and that you have a vested interest against said topic. We should be seeking to include all encyclopaedic content and so your deletions of good edits which provide more information and are properly referenced need to stop - otherwise this platform is not providing objective and correct information - its one core aim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RackinRibs (talk • contribs) 16:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
There was no threat in my message. Just a request that you allow information that you might disagree with. Many thanks for accepting revisions. I'm sure we can work together to improve the page in the long term. RackinRibs (talk) 16:44, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
You shouldn't threaten me with a block. I made two correct edits. Cranmer's blog is not a criticism of C4M so is not relevant. And those polls do not show clear support for same-sex marriage, but more slim support or a split as I added. Your edits are obviously biased. Please remember this is an encyclopaedic entry. Crayfishvictoria (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
The poll provides evidence of slim support, not clear support as you added. Crayfishvictoria (talk) 15:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Coalition for Marriage shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Alexf(talk) 12:47, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I remember you gave me a (V)(;,,;)(V)... wouldn't you have a Bender over there? Can you teach me how to do it? Also, when I visit Old Havana I am planning to take a picture of a graffiti of the best robot ever ( which is Bender of course), and add it to his article. Thanks in advance! Miss Bono [zootalk] 14:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
PS:By the way, I've just finished to watch 6th Season. And... I love The Simpsons too!! Miss Bono [zootalk] 14:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
gay village
Thank you, colourful WTT graduate who likes pink, for quality articles such as Citroën C3 Picasso and other cars, for projects such as Birmingham Gay Village, for being "constantly dismayed ..." and collecting evil creatures with love, for editor retention, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:37, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I love the tabs at the top of your Talk page. Is it OK to copy it for my own talk page or is that 'out-of-line'? Cheers Melbourne3163 (talk) 22:50, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the kitten! You can have one too! No one needs reasons for kittens! I'm glad you appreciate my work on the reference desk. I'd like to do more in the article space, but so far I haven't run into an article (or lack of an article) that has pushed me into putting work into it.
Katie R (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jenove. I have taken the liberty of reposting some of your content from User:Jenova20/Criticism of the Daily Mail and Mail Online at my own collection User:John/Is the Daily Mail a reliable source?. I hope that's ok and of course you are welcome to copy any of my content. --John (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Check the PCC site itself for numbers of complaints. In 2012, over 12,000 complaints were lodged. Of these in only 101 was the Code breached. Looking at June 2013, for example, there were fewer than 61 separate complaints against the DM. None were found to be a breach of standards by the PCC. Daily Telegraph 34 - no breach. Virtually every major paper is in the list ... and no breaches were adjudicated by the PCC. "The Sun" did have one case where remedial action was taken. In May 2013, only one case was "adjudicated upheld" - against the "South Wales Argus". Similar numbers for other months. I used "separate cases" as sometimes 20 complaints were made for the same article -- the Daily Mail is the only paper to attract "mass complaints" for trivial stuff like a "2 Day Diet" which was complained about etc. No sign of breaches of the Code, nor any of defamation that I could find. Yo are welcome to do the stats -- the Telegraph and Sun have comparable actual figures to the DM, and the Guardian has up to 1/2 the complaints. In point of simple fact, almost all of the complaints verge on the ludicrous :(. To assert the DM has an unusual number of libel losses does not compute. Even The Times lost to Lance Armstrong. Collect (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
"Some of the results here – that The Sun and The Mail would be far in the lead in terms of number of complaints, for example, and that the The Sport would be full of breaches – are to be expected."
-- Hillbillyholiday talk 21:24, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
However, the percentage of complaints upheld by the PPC isn't a good measure to judge newspapers. For instance, there's the fact that:
Three newspaper editors are represented on the Commission: those of The Sunday Telegraph, The Sunday Mirror and The Mail on Sunday – coincidentally the three papers least likely to have complaints upheld against them in adjudication.
-- Hillbillyholiday talk 21:28, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
The number of complaints is a valid measure, but the number of cases upheld is not; only a miniscule number of complaints actually are upheld (in the region of one percent[1]), often due to sufficient 'remedial action' being offered (i.e. typically a postage-stamp sized retraction buried within the paper). -- Hillbillyholiday talk 21:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Chairman of the PCC’s Editor’s Code of Practise Committee and Daily Mail Editor, Paul Dacre, has promised to fully investigate complaints about a Daily Mail article he personally approved."PCC’s Paul Dacre to ‘fully investigate’ Daily Mail story he completely approved of" News Thump
Also, there's the matter of illegal news-gathering techniques to consider.
In 2006 the Information Commissioner named the Daily Mail among newspapers which had dealt with a firm of private investigators involved in the illegal trade of personal information. The report, What Price Privacy Now?, said the Mail had used the firm the most - with 952 transactions by 58 journalists.
Top offenders identified in Operation Motorman. For the full list see: "What Price Privacy Now? p.9
|
|
|
Further reading: Nick Davies (2009) Flat Earth News: An Award-winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media p.273 -- Hillbillyholiday talk 03:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
David Cameron today and Ed Miliband yesterday were in uncommon agreement that it must be ditched. Baroness Buscombe, its chairman, never looked remotely up to the task of holding a newspaper out of control to account. For what, the Baroness plaintively asked, could she do if lied to by senior figures in the press? This is truly pathetic. "Absent, ineffective, lacking in rigour," was Mr Cameron's judgement.
I'm thinking about making a new article about films related to hate crime murders called List of Films about Hate Crimes. I was going to divide it into sections. So far I have Black, Asian, Native American, Jewish and LGBT. I am also more than willing to admit that at this time the list is incredibly americentric which is not my intention. Here is the list so far Blacks: Sins of the Father, Attack on Terror, Mississippi Burning, Murder in Mississippi, Neshoba, Blood Done Sign my Name, Two Towns of Jasper and Jasper Texas. Asians: Who Killed Vincent Chin?, Vincent Who? Native Americans: Thunderheart, Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, A Place called Chiapas. Jewish: The People vs. Leo Frank, Betrayed, Talk Radio, Crown Heights, Brooklyn Babylon and for LGBT I have Any Mother's Son, Boy's Don't Cry, The Brandon Teena Story, Anatomy of a Hate Crime, The Laramie Project, The Matthew Shepard Story, Laramie Inside Out, Matt Shepard is my Friend, Soildier's Girl, A Girl Like Me, Clapham Junction and Accesory to Murder. I was hoping you could do two things for me. A) Add some UK films and B) Expand the LGBT section and others if you can. Thanks:)-Rainbowofpeace (talk) 01:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
--benlisquareT•C•E 14:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
I was told of a possible solution to this problem. More here.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 13:22, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your input on comment on person rather than content. Please read the Wiki guidance that describes that as a personal attack.Patroit22 (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Jenova20 These comment are directed at me and not my comments and appear to be a separate personal attack. What is the basis? Am I am missing something?Patroit22 (talk) 18:37, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
No, this was not accusing you of a personal attack but your posts seem to question whether comments on contributors rather than contents comply with Wiki standards. Ciao. Patroit22 (talk) 17:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
For goodness sake, don't encourage him! (I LOL'd though...) Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 21:48, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013
Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...
New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian
Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.
New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??
New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges
News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY
Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions
New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration
Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Trick or Treat! Happy Halloween Jenova20! I hope you have a great day and remember to be safe if you go trick-or-treating tonight with friends, family or loved ones. Happy Halloween! — dainomite 15:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Help spread Wikilove by adding ((subst:User:Dainomite/HappyHalloween)) to other users' talk pages whether they be friends, acquaintances or random folks. |
Hello Jenova20, Miss Bono has given you an lovely bat, to wish you a Happy Halloween! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a lovely bat! Enjoy! | |
Spread the goodness of a lovely bat by adding ((subst:User:Miss Bono/Halloween)) to their talk page with a friendly message. |
It looks like he removed material from Senegal before going on vacation and then restored it on his November 1 return.[3]. I reverted it (and then forgot I had done so, and reverted what turned out to be my own reversion, so now I've re-deleted it again).
Also, this discussion I initiated on his talk page and my follow-up on my talk page in case he decides to address me there when he feels like it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
I suggest you review the above rule. You are not above it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.128.181 (talk) 13:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:AfricaTanz. —Largo Plazo (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)