Welcome!
Hello, Jddphd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place ((helpme))
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 04:31, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
High-profile pages like "Algebra" are messed up every day. When fixing obvious vandalism, you aren't obliged to explain on the talk page — just do it. You can put "rvv" (reverting vandalism) in the edit-summary box. Xanthoxyl 09:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Boom! (TV series). I do not think that Boom! (TV series) fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because ther is very little conteNt here, but there is pleanty of conteXt. That is, any reader knows what the article is about, and knows or has a good idea of where to look for more info to exapnd the article. ther may be issues with notability, adn at the moment no reliable sources are cited, but thsi has context and either should be allowed to grow, or else deleted via afd or perhaps ((prod)), not speedy, IMO. I request that you consider not re-tagging Boom! (TV series) for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES (talk) 22:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
It's not vandalism because it will exist in the future. But i suppose you percieve reality differently than i do. I apologize, i had no ill will. --TheWhiteRabbitt
Sup, dude. I think you have me confused with the other user, IP: 68.38.248.208
Look at the history again: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Randy_Saaf&action=history
If you note my description: (removed ", but I still enjoy being a fucking scumbag")
"removed" being the keyword there. Thanks.
Thank you for making a report at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. In this case it's because 67.134.156.199 didn't vandalize after the warning from today. Since IPs change, we don't block unless IP vandalism was recent (last 12-24 hours). Anyway, thanks again for your counter-vandalism efforts. Drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers!--Chaser - T 02:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
I protected the page for an hour and reverted to the version that wasn't messed up. Thanks for the heads-up! NawlinWiki 17:01, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I responded to your comments on my talk page. I certainly don't want to drag you in, but I thought you'd want a response. Thanks for your time. Jmfangio| ►Chat 19:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
This was the biggest issue about the NFL infobox template. For what I would consider a pretty sound argument (as in it can be backed up with facts from the best sources), see my last two comments at: Template_talk:Infobox_NFLactive#WP:3O_request.►Chris Nelson 20:06, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
wtf?►Chris Nelson 20:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
I have a possible solution - I've posted it on the Talk page. If that doesn't work then I don't know what to do. Jddphd 05:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
((helpme))
I think I messed up a report of a suspected sockpuppet. The suspected puppet is Bob Lee Swagger, the puppeteer is MadeinFinland. Can someone tell me what to do or whom to contact?
Thanks so much for the Barnstar! What a great surprise...! The article still needs quite a bit of work, but I'm so glad to know that I made a difference and I really appreciate your thoughtfulness... – Dreadstar † 23:40, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
I saw your comment on the RFM talk page (now rejected). I know you aren't interested in being directly involved, but I'm very frustrated with this and you seem to be interested enough that perhaps you can give me some words of wisdom. I try and go through proper avenues, cite policy and guideline, and have for the most part, tried to be civil with these people. At times, I have intentionally been moderately "uncivil" because I'm spending all my time trying to get them to discuss matters and being attacked personally by all these people. I have spent soooo much time jumping through hoops to get things moving a long and nothing is working. For now, the template is locked, but I just don't know what to do. Even when they don't have a problem (my moving of the position related articles), they change their views after the discussion has taken place. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 06:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
You got around to marking Babs Yaris for deletion before I could. CrowstarVaseline-on-the-lens-Jitsu!fwends! 15:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jddphd.
Just a note: Please have a look into the block log before you report a user to WP:UAA—they have all been blocked yet. By the way, they have been reported by bots before. :) Greetings, —DerHexer (Talk) 16:39, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Check baby check - <span style="font-family:verdana;font-size:11px">((user|jddphd))</span> 01:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
((user|jddphd)) 01:24, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
jddphd (talk · contribs) 01:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC) again
one more test jddphd (talk · contribs) 01:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
If you feel you are well versed on the "Pro Bowl Debate", please vote at Template_talk:Infobox_NFLactive#Survey. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 21:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Chrisjnelson Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 03:23, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Hallo, its widley known that Serge Moati has been one of the consultant /public relation of Francois Mitterrand. (see for instance see french wikipipedia). In his autobiography (du côte des vivants )(Paris /Fayard 2006) - Serge Moati descriped how he managed the pr&campagne of Mitterrand during the 1981 election. Pinus pinea 13:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
There's no real required level of participation in an ArbCom case, so you're welcome to participate as much or as little as you like. If you become aware of ongoing issues or previous ones not entered into evidence, you can of course add those, and everyone's welcome to make suggestions and comments on the Workshop page if desired. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)