Hello, I'm AKS.9955. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Cena because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Actor. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Can up you lol. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Actor because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Can up you lol (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

He was already warned for those. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 20:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dallas. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. General Ization ^Talk 00:23, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Fort Worth, Texas. Materialscientist (talk) 00:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Oh. I've only been blocked. This isn't good. I'll just make a frivolous unblock appeal so I can get banned[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hurricane996 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I want to be bannedHurricane996 (talk)

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked. PhilKnight (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.