|
In order to clear the way for the move, you could move the edit history (current page at Gerbera jamesonii to Gerbera Jamesonii, as the edit history needs to be kept for attribution purposes, so displacing it to the capitalized pagename would allow an historyless redirect to be overwritten by the merged article. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Smtchahal. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Talk:Mekan, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Smtchahal (talk) 10:31, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Concerning the Fighting Veres redirect which you tagged for speedy and which I declined speedy. Frankly, I would not bother pursue deletion, as Fighting Veres is a plausible redirect, as the title of a book about the Earls of Oxford. However, in the future, if you wish to seek deletion, take a look at WP:RfD which tells you how to list redirects for discussion. Also, if you think they may qualify for speedy deletion, take a look at WP:Speedy Deletion and scroll down to the two criteria concerning redirects R2 & R3. Generally speaking, however, redirects are considered cheap and unless they appear to be an obvious problem, they are generally just left as is. That seems to be the case for Fighting Veres. Safiel (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rahul Jekar Aheshash has been created per your report of suspious user to my talk page. jni (delete)...just not interested 07:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello! Rettungsgasse is "mentősáv" in Hungarian. It's applicable since September 1, 2012 on highways, according to "228/2012. (VIII. 23.) Korm. rendelet 5. § (5)."
Here's the statute on the official government homepage. It's on page 18557 (page 11 of the .pdf). ebi. (talk) 01:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the ((admin help)) template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
Today i reverted this (3 edits diff) and about the user i found IncidentArchive614. i think it would be good to delete the attack because it is combined with a personal name (notice: the photo of the person is already deleted on Commons). Can please someone have a look and think about deletion and maybe also about blocking this user? Holger1959 (talk) 00:13, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your feedback. We had a chat on the Neanderthal talk page just recently concerning readability etc. We decided to clean up the article. I gave it a go and with the help of ·maunus we got that far. I'd be glad to get some critics, advice etc. Alles Gute Wikirictor (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Holger1959. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Holger1959. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)