I see that you have not yet made an entry at that AfD. Change your mind, or still puzzled on how-to? Also, at Wikipedia, OK to disagree with other editors about content, but personal attacks and threats ("patu") are forbidden and can lead to being permanently blocked. David notMD (talk) 15:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
I am going to see if this works as a communication tool HER KNIGHT (talk) 15:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
At the AfD, your recommendation for Delete is still visible. However, your extended text and some back and forth with another editor have been moved to a collapsed text section. Still there if readers want to open it via "Show.". Expect an Administrator decision in 7-14 days. Again, its not a vote - Admin reads everything and decides. What I suggest you do at this time is find other articles that interest you, to edit. You can put the AfD on your Watch list, so that you can keep abreast of more comments and the final decision. David notMD (talk) 13:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Katelyn Nicole Davis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 13:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Acroterion (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)I see that the decision on the article was Delete. I hope that you can bring your enthusiasm to editing other articles while refraining from attacking editors who disagree with you, or from posting content that is either unsubstantiated or not germane to the articles in question. David notMD (talk) 12:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)