Hi!
Please leave a message here if you want to contact me. If your message is urgent, please leave it here instead.
Ok, when you want to revert something, go through history and compare the last versions, or whatever you want to revert. Then, you will notice that [rollback (AGF)] || [rollback] || [rollback (VANDAL)] are at the top. AGF mean Assuming Good Faith(if you think the change was accidental) rollback is just a regular revert and VANDAL logs the edit as a vandal revert. Once you click one of those buttons, a window should automatically open to the last person who edited the page. If you want to give them a warning, click on the warn tab that is at the top of the page, select at warning message, then click the reason. the summary is optional, but appears on the vandal's page. Got it? Peace. Spartan-James 23:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi
I'm using a local installation of mediawiki and I use templates from wikipedia. the problem is that any template that includes parser function syntax such as #if is being rendered on the page as regular text.
It's as if the parser function syntax is not available in the wiki do I need to install/import something?
Might you be able to help please?
Thanks!
I'm sorry about the userpage instead of the talkpage- a newbie's honest mistake...
Thanks for pointing me as to who to ask
Sorry
The image you requested has been reviewed and worked on. Please come to the Graphic Lab and let me know what you think. Thanks. -- VegitaU 21:43, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you are not the first one who used the image from de:Kanüle -- which in fact is about intravenous needles (the word has almost became a false friend). The en:Cannula article is still a mess and doesn't explain the difference. If read carefully, no single paragraph of it deals with a hard or sharpened tubing that itself can puncture the body. The description is more like that of an intravenous catheter, for example, the upper device in Image:Catheter dissasembled.jpg. Unfortunately your image creates more confusion than explains something, and I don't know how to improve the article correspondingly without resorting to OR. --saimhe 12:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
I love it. If you're not a fan of AT&T, then it's not for you, but otherwise, I'd definitely recommend it. Plus, if you like that whole style of interface that Apple uses in OS X and programs like iTunes, then you'll especially love it. Even though it doesn't do as much as some other phones, I personally think that it makes up for what it lacks with an amazingly easy to use interface and strong, reliable software that has yet to crash on me at all.
So, should you choose to buy it, I hope you love it as much as I have! Best wishes, aido2002talk 20:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Du er rask du ... takk for hjelpa, jeg hadde sikkert glemt det selv ;) --EivindJ (talk) 20:06, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
I saw that you were in discussion with the user at the Norwegian Wikipedia, and even saw my name mentioned. I'm curious to know as to what that was about. Thanks, indopug (talk) 16:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
<saw your comment on Friday's page> If you thought that was dumb, what do you think of this? Just moments after rudget blocked another one of his socks. indopug (talk) 19:39, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
I strongly disagree with idea of him being allowed to edit on English Wikipedia. Even when he edits with a single account I've seen him frequently edit war and abuse other editors (calling them idiot etc if they don't conform to his POV etc). He also very often tries to push his POV using unreliable sources, even after being told that they are unacceptable. Further there's his abuse of FLC; countless times he's nominated articles that weren't nearly ready. He's done it once on FAC too. (which is when I caught him, after his vote-fraud) So to have him have anything to do with this project would only be detrimental, I'm sorry to say. indopug (talk) 20:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
You speak Norwegian? I will be in need of a translator in the next week or two. –xenocidic (talk) 18:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
It's me. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 12:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Superunknown › '''Be Black Hole Sun''' – ~~~~
nederst på siden, og så lagrer du siden. Deretter, når ditt navn er endret, logger du på kontoen, med passordet du har på Superunknown-kontoen. Så går du til Spesial:MergeAccount (og resten kan du). — H92 (t · c · no) 16:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Okay men kan du reversere endringene han kjetil r gjorde på bruker siden min. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hvorfor? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Regarding the notice you left on his userpage, I think he has been blocked for abusing multiple accounts, one person alone is not permitted to tell admins not to block people. Forgive if I'm missing something, but it seems as if you have taken it upon yourself to over-rule community consensus. Could you please explain? Qst (talk) 16:06, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Yeah make sure you guys eighter make a new page for the 2nd generation ipod touch. or make a new section on this page for the ipod touch G2 or iPTG2.
and here is some news about the JailBreaking news as of now.
[quote]Submitted by jfb392 on Sep 09, 2008 - 5:52 PM Unfortunately, it looks like the current form of Pwnage won't work with the new iPod touch (n72ap). The device has a new GID key (I assume this is because it uses a different processor; the S5L8720x, rather than the S5L8900 used in the first iPod touch, iPhone and iPhone 3G), which means that none of the system images can be decrypted. Each image contains a KBAG tag which is 0x20 long (64 bytes) that is decrypted by the hardware AES engine, then the resulting keys are used to decrypt the image itself. Since the GID key differs from every other device, you can only decrypt KBAG tag data using n72ap itself. Of course, this leads you to a dead end, since you use either the kernel or iBoot to gain access to the hardware AES engine (which usually cannot be accessed). A new exploit will have to be found to allow access to the hardware AES engine first, so that the KBAG data can then be decrypted, which will then allow for images to be decrypted and modified.
So, we have to wait for a new low-level exploit or settle for something less than Pwnage (probably not possible, since 2.x is locked down). Unfortunately, I don't think this will happen very quickly, since the Dev Team is actually the iPhone Dev Team, and they don't seem to prioritize the iPod touch. Here's to hoping though!
Props to Chronic and WEsTbAeR-- for making the processor and model information available so quickly. I assume that one of the two, or both, also discovered that there is a new GID key. [/quote] Exit1010 (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juan de Cervantes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan de Cervantes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 00:45, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)