This is FreeSharedKnowledge's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:FreeSharedKnowledge/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 07:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FreeSharedKnowledge! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 07:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EPDIC (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:EPDIC may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 07:55, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any copyrighted content. Wouldn't it be helpful to say what's a problem? FreeSharedKnowledge (talk) 08:02, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you refer to the content of http://epdic.ing.unitn.it/, I am the author and "owner" of the website !!! FreeSharedKnowledge (talk) 08:03, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that is the website I linked to in the decline notice. For some reason, the talk page notification did not include that part if the notice, but you can see it on the draft page. Wouldn't it be helpful to say what's a problem? Please take a few minutes to read the notices above, carefully, and follow the links in them. Your point is specifically addressed there, and in Eagleash's post you will also find an explanation of what the minimum requirements are for a Wikipedia article. As you remarked on the Help page, we are all volunteers here, and while those of us with more experience are happy to help out, there is no point in doing that if less experienced volunteers don't take the time to read the reaponses they have already received. --bonadea contributions talk 08:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So you'd like the text to be rephrased (not paraphrased) ? It's just the description of a scientific event, and committee. It would help to have a form to sign to release any right to copy contributions from the website (http://epdic.ing.unitn.it/). I don't know if I'll be able to do anything else, a bit too complicated for me. Too bad, I've always supported Wikipedia so far, and I thought it was an organization a little closer to users. Of course I understand all the legal issues, although in this case, considering the purposes, I would have expected more flexibility. For now I give up FreeSharedKnowledge (talk) 08:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]