Hello, Firatlal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> ((cite web | .... ))</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== ((Reflist))
Hello, I'm IamNotU. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lahmacun seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 02:08, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Safavid dynasty. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 19:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
this is not my own opinion. The Safavids are Turco-persian state, they have nothing to do with the Kurds. can you tell me the source you used? Firatlal (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:HistoryofIran. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism??? Are fucking kidding me? You're all racist Firatlal (talk) 01:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 05:19, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Hello Firatlal,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Alexandermcnabb, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Öd Tengri, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at [[(({article))}]]. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with ((Re|Alexandermcnabb))
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Karash Han, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
No one does research on Turkic mythology. Only some Turks have resources. If there are other sources, find them. It's not my fault no one's doing any research on this. Firatlal (talk) 01:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Firatlal!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Hello Firatlal. This is not a good example of how to address other users ('which idiot..'). Please be aware that people can be blocked for personal attacks. Also, your comment suggests you have no interest in looking at any reliable sources on Kurdish ancestry of the Safavids. Meanwhile, you are happy to state that they intermarried with the Turkmen, also without a source. Finally, you removed two references in the same edit. Do you think the article is better without those references? Are you sure you know enough to be editing here? EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Can you please tell me where I insulted other users? You add things to every page about the Turks according to your own interests. it's called pathetic, and it's not an insult. Firatlal (talk) 02:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Turkmen Sahra. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 06:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Szélatya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Turkmen and Ottoman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Öd Tengri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Per this comment about Persian editors ('Persians on Wikipedia are pathetic') at Talk:Persianate society. If this abuse continues you may be indefinitely blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm not saying my insults are true. Wikipedia is not an impartial source, too many users upload false information, but you block me instead of correcting them. Firatlal (talk) 01:47, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
"warlike editing on Turkic matters" Can you explain what that means? are you slandering me now? I didn't even do anything except add a few maps to the page of Turkic States and dynasties. Firatlal (talk) 04:13, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
a few months ago, I made an edit on the Safavid page, and they blocked me, and I didn't do anything else after that day.it's ridiculous that you're even blocking me right now, because I haven't edited any pages, I've just stated my opinion in the talk section. that's what the talk pages are for. Firatlal (talk) 04:17, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Why don't you answer. Firatlal (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Heyyy Firatlal (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
It's been 5 days, please unblock me. what do you want? please answer me. Firatlal (talk) 11:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Firatlal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
they blocked me for 3 days for saying my own opinion on the talk page, slandered me when I said it was unfair for them to block me, and they blocked me indefinitely. he didn't answer when I texted him again, and I've been blocked for 7 days now. Isn't talk pages a place to say our own opinion without insulting someone?I'm just new to Wikipedia, so I can't quite understand some things. I'm really sorry if I made a mistake unwittingly Firatlal (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're going to need to acknowledge the personal attacks that you made and commit to not repeating this behavior if you want this block lifted. signed, Rosguill talk 19:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
So why not do something to racist users on Wikipedia? I'm sorry, but a lot of pages on Wikipedia are in the hands of racists, and you're not doing anything about it. as I said, I'm new to Wikipedia, so I don't know everything.yes, I made a mistake, and the penalty for this was 3 days of blocking, but it was 7 days, why don't you remove my blocking? what do you want? I can't understand. Firatlal (talk) 19:50, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Again, I apologize, yes, I am guilty, I wrote it with a momentary anger. I didn't want to insult a person or a nation, I was just angry at racist and troll users who were on Wikipedia. I promise I won't do it again, I won't even talk to anyone if I have to. Firatlal (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Firatlal. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Karash Han, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Firatlal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Öd Tengri".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 11:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
is open. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:59, 10 May 2022 (UTC)