Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Sui generis‎, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 23:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you inappropriately characterized ophadano as a 'micronation' though it is a serious entity. Is that why the edit was not considered constructive? Because of nobody caring? Emmanuel Scuaze (talk) 23:44, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, humor me--what the heck is it, then? From what I've been able to discern online, it appears to be an entity which is trying to claim some form of national sovereignty but I found nothing to indicate where it is, not even someone's backyard. That screams "micronation" to me, and even if that's not entirely accurate, you have a different definition of a "serious entity" than I do. --Finngall ^talk 00:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, do not reinstate the edit to Sui generis unless you can come up with evidence that Ophadano is notable by Wikipedia's standards for organizations. --Finngall ^talk 00:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ophadano is a jurisdiction not a state.

it is used by unrepresented & stateless peoples in absence of a government or state. Furthermore, it has access to the ICJ and was recognized as a 'foreign state' in US District Courts Riverside. Emmanuel Scuaze (talk) 00:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References, please, from other than the "jurisdiction's" websites? I found nothing online to independently verify these claims. --Finngall ^talk 02:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Statelessness. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What would be appropriate text? Emmanuel Scuaze (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is not promotional material it is people and belief based material Emmanuel Scuaze (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City State of Kitwe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City State of Kitwe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:52, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ophadano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ophadano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 01:55, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:45, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A fucking spam link? Emmanuel Scuaze (talk) 11:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]