Hello, Eihsok, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Milton, Ontario, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can . You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Milton, Ontario. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Eihsok! Your additions to Eyelash extensions have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 04:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Eyelash extensions, you may be blocked from editing. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 04:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Eyelash extensions. Please stop trying to promote that "Secret Lash Club". Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 05:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
You uploaded those images yourself and claimed that they were your own work. Therefore, you clearly have a conflict of interest and absolutely should not be inserting that company into Wikipedia articles yourself. If you want the images to be used, you need to remove the watermarks and leave off any mention of "Secret Lash Club" (in the article's image description or on the image itself). Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 05:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
You made an edit to the article Range Rover Classic, with which you gave a very detailed edit summary, describing a number of very small changes which you made. However, in the same edit you also made a much bigger change, namely removing some references, but you didn't mention those in your edit summary. You may like to watch out to avoid similar mistakes in future.
In the same edit you replaced "moulded" with "molded", and in several places "aluminium" with "aluminum". Wikipedia does not give preference to any national variety of English over others. In some cases there is a good reason for using one national variety; for example in the article Winston Churchill it makes sense to use British English, while in the article San Fransisco it makes sense to use US English. However, when there is no such specific reason for preferring one version, it is not acceptable to change content of an article to comply with one's own preferences. In this case, where the article is on a British subject, imposing specifically American forms of words isn't a good idea. JBW (talk) 10:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Bbb23 (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Eihsok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am new to Wikipedia and am still learning how things work. It appears that user @Apparition11 may have asked their friends to report my account after I called out their apparent intentions in leaving a page the way it was. I apologize if my actions or words were inappropriate and I will strive to better understand and adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines in the future. I would like to appeal for a ban if one has been imposed. I also can't reply to any of the users that reported me. I find the system unfair I was just trying to provide the knowledge I have in a certain industry.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only, a second appeal is open below. One appeal at a time. -- ferret (talk) 21:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eihsok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia community, I am writing to appeal my block and to request that it be lifted. I understand that I am blocked for Disruptive editing I can assure you that I will not engage in this behavior again and that I will make productive contributions to the site instead. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience or disruption that I may have caused, and I hope that you will consider lifting my block. I am committed to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and to contributing to the site in a positive and constructive manner.
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but your unblock request is too vague. You mention that you were blocked for disruptive edits, but did not specify why your edits were disruptive. Perhaps the biggest issue I see right now is your insistence that other people were wrong per this comment. It should be noted that you had reported Apparition11 to a public noticeboard, where any Wikipedia editor can see and leave their input on. Your later accusation that they recruited their friends to report you is an example of casting aspersions, which is not permitted.
For your unblock request to be accepted, you will need to properly explain why you were blocked. You will need to focus on your own actions, and not the actions of other people. Unblock requests that claim that others were wrong and you were right are generally declined. Currently, I do not see any indication that you are aware that your edits were problematic and that you were blocked for that reason. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:21, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eihsok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Members, I am writing to request an unblock. I understand that my recent edits were deemed disruptive, and I take full responsibility for my actions. I did not realize at the time that my edits were causing problems, and I apologize for any disruption that I caused. Upon reflection, I realize that my edits did not adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Disruptive editing was not followed in my edits. I understand now that it is important to follow these policies and guidelines in order to maintain the quality and integrity of the encyclopedia. I have learned from this experience, and I am committed to improving my editing skills and making more constructive contributions to Wikipedia in the future. To that end, I am willing to do the following: • Review and familiarize myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those related to [policy or guideline that you violated] • Seek guidance from more experienced editors or participate in Wikipedia's mentorship programs to improve my understanding of how to edit effectively and constructively • Engage in good faith discussions with other editors and seek consensus when making changes to articles • Avoid making disruptive edits or engaging in behavior that may violate Wikipedia's policies and guidelines I also understand that casting aspersions on other editors is not permitted, and I apologize for any accusations or insinuations that I made. I will make sure to focus on my own behavior and avoid making such comments in the future. I understand that my actions have consequences, and I am willing to accept any terms or conditions that may be imposed on me as a result of this unblock request. I hope that you will consider granting my unblock request and give me the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines going forward. Sincerely, Eihsok
Decline reason:
"particularly those related to [policy or guideline that you violated]" I'm offended at the lack of effort you are demonstrating. Yamla (talk) 21:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Eihsok (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Members, I am writing to request an unblock. I sincerely apologize for my recent disruptive edits and for any problems that I caused. In hindsight, I realize that my actions did not adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I understand the importance of following these guidelines in order to maintain the quality and integrity of the encyclopedia. I take full responsibility for my mistakes, and I am committed to learning from this experience and improving my editing skills. I promise to be more mindful of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines going forward, and to make only constructive contributions to the site. To that end, I am willing to do the following: • Review and familiarize myself with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, particularly those related to Disruptive Behavior & User Interactions. • Seek guidance from more experienced editors or participate in Wikipedia's mentorship programs to improve my understanding of how to edit effectively and constructively • Engage in good faith discussions with other editors and seek consensus when making changes to articles • Avoid making disruptive edits or engaging in behavior that may violate Wikipedia's policies and guidelines I also understand that casting aspersions on other editors is not permitted, and I apologize for any accusations or insinuations that I made. I will make sure to focus on my own behavior and avoid making such comments in the future. I understand that my actions have consequences, and I am willing to accept any terms or conditions that may be imposed on me because of this unblock request. I hope that you will consider granting my unblock request and give me the opportunity to demonstrate my commitment to following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines going forward. Sincerely, Eihsok
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — Voice of Clam (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You are not permitted to modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 22:33, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Can you please clarify the following point. You have posted photographs to Wikimedia Commons which you said were sourced from a particular web site, and that those photographs were your own work. You also said that you had permission from the owners of that web site to post those photographs. Clearly, therefore, you have a close relationship with the business which owns the website. What exactly is the nature of your relationship to that business? JBW (talk) 23:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)