Hello, Deenyk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --KchaseT 06:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Deenyk, you might take a look at some of our notability guidelines if you intend to create articles about yourself and your business on wikipedia. Among them are WP:BIO and WP:CORP. WP:COI and WP:AUTO also merit a look, as does WP:NPOV. Finally, note that blatant promotional material can be deleted without discussion by any Wikipedia administrator, as can articles that doesn't assert the significance of the subject matter. Thanks.--KchaseT 06:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I posted this on the redirected talk page, and you probably didn't see it.
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Place ((hangon)) on the page. Please do not remove any existing speedy deletion notice(s)
Make your case on the article's talk page.
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Bonadea 09:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Demiurge 19:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Demiurge 20:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Demiurge 21:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'd love to know why you consider the explanation of a technology "spamming". I have seen others listing their service organizations. I have listed the only existing, recognized technology for language dubbing and subtitling of motion pictures and television. This is a multi billion dollar business that simply didn't exist until very recently and one of the reasons for its growth is the development of the Emmy Award Winning TM Systems language customizatin technology.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Deenyk (talk • contribs)
Because your contributions are intended to promote your own company and are not appropriate for Wikipedia (your username is related to Deeny Kaplan, who is an employee of the company in question). If you are here to promote your company's products or services, you are in the wrong place and your contributions will not be accepted. Demiurge 21:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have noted that you edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 21:41, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am new to Wikipedia and I may need some assistance, however the TM Systems technology has become a standard in worldwide language cutomization, or language translation, dubbing and subtitling, allowing for extremely quick customization of any program, into every recognizable language. TM Systems is the only such technology to have received an Emmy Award for its contribution to the international language customization world. This is not "blatent" advertising. It is an explanation of an accepted technology. Please note that other listings do list language services...this is a technology, accepted by a worldwide industry.
Under Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy, you should refrain from creating the article yourself or inserting references to it into other articles, because you appear to be an employee of the company. If the company is as notable as you claim, someone else will be sure to create the article for you. If the article is to be retained, it will need reliable independent sources that verify your claims. Third-party newspaper articles, magazine reviews etc. would be great, but note that the company website itself and press releases are not suitable sources. And also note that the article must be written from a neutral point of view. Demiurge 21:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your explanation. I would like to include a number of articles. Please tell me how to link them.
Didn't you read my explanation at all? You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia at all in relation to your company, because you are an employee and therefore have a conflict of interest. Please stop inserting references to your company, or you are liable to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Demiurge 21:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How can I get these articles added? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deenyk (talk • contribs)
The same way every other company gets their articles added: get third-party magazine/newspaper articles written about you. See WP:CORP for the specific guidelines. Demiurge 22:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The point is, I think, that if a concept (a technology for instance) is that important, sooner or later there will be disinterested people adding articles about them. You can't "get" things included (asking somebody else to write them for you is the same as writing them yourself, for this purpose). At least this is how I understand the notability guidelines. --Bonadea 22:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on TM Systems, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding ((hangon)) to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 07:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article Language customization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This is a corporate jargon term with no refs. It basically means the same thing as translation. There is no encyclopedic content to the page. It is, at best, a dictionary definition for a phrase that isn't really used (no refs!), and at worst it is (likely) a sneaky promotion for whatever company uses the term.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
