Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Olamide, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Olamide, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi DahSound! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC) |
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tom Cruise. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:27, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
I found a relevant source of information for this draft, please help me see whether it's of standard Sam Kuru - [1] DahSound (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Please review these drafts @WikiDan61- Draft:Butlr and Draft:Jiani_Zeng DahSound (talk) 01:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
DahSound (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't understand, how am I being paid?. I am not paid for creating this article. The article I was paid to make was Christopher Naghili which was deleted and I disclosed. :I understand the rules and regulations that guides Wikipedia article creation and I wouldn't risk getting banned,rather I asked questions. :I am very sorry if you read my draft so. I made my research on those topics and checked whether it had an article or images before I went ahead. It is wrong to get paid and not disclose it, but I did in my Christopher Naghili article. Kindly see to this, because this is an error. I just went through the reasons why I was banned and I'm very shocked. I am being accused of being a sockpet?. The accounts I'm being accused of associating with I'm not acquainted with them or do I ever know they even existed. I discovered Butlr while searching the internet for companies and it popped up, I checked whether it had a Wikipedia page, and found out it didn't. I made my research and founded that the other founder didn't have a Wikipedia page so I researched about her. If I knew that those articles had issues I wouldn't have gone ahead at all. This is a big misunderstanding. I didn't investigate the articles and its issues and frequent attempt made in editing. I thought I was the first. This is an error, kindly investigate Thank you. DahSound (talk)
Decline reason:
What an amazing coincidence. No misunderstanding; you've simply failed to disclose your relationship with paid placements and now you're just lying about it. I'm disappointed that you were given another chance and chose to immediately abuse the administrators' good faith. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DahSound (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@Kuru I am not lying, I never knew that the previous draft/article had a 'paid for tag' on it. You corrected me and I took correction and I have no joy of getting blocked again,I knew how I felt when that happened. If I knew there was a way to warn people from creating a banned draft or articles I would have avoided creating it at all. I don't want a draft/article I decided to make get my account blocked,if deleting them then do. How will I create a draft or article for educational purposes then,if there is no way to know if that draft or article had issues in the best. Before I draft a page I ensure that the page doesn't have a wiki page or draft.. Kindly deliberate on this issue,because this is a very big mistake and I am very shocked. I plead, verify this. But Please someone see to this. I feel very threatened, because anything I do here is an error, why? Is as if a group of people are targeting my userpage. Please verify. How can I contribute to Wikipedia if everything I do is an error, I reviewed Articles for creation and I got attacked and blocked, but I took correction, then I was unblocked, and now this?. I registered on Wikipedia 3 years ago. After which I totally forgot I had one because of my personal life and education,years later I got a new phone. I was scrolling on the web, and visited Wikipedia and I tried registering until I was notified that my email is already linked to an account And I got in into my account. An d I used my userpage to practice some edits by looking at other userpages. All this issues arose because of my Draft Christopher Naghili which I was paid for,and after much correction I followed the rules and guide. From that day my account as been under threat just because I followed the rules(disclosing that I was paid)?.Everything I do now is an error,from reviewing articles,to speedy deletion, to creating drafts?. Please verify. Thank youDahSound (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)DahSound (talk)
Decline reason:
I have just spent a significant amount of time doing extensive checking, as a favour to you, to see whether it would be possible to justify unblocking your account. As you may be able to imagine, I am not well pleased to discover that you were wasting my time and abusing my good will, because you are just lying. I don't know whether you thought that your unblock would be reviewed by an administrator who wouldn't bother to do the relevant checking, or whether you are unable to see how blindingly obvious it would be to anyone who did check. JBW (talk) 20:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Jiani Zeng requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiani Zeng. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:19, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
DahSound (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@JBW thank you for reviewing and I appreciate. Also in no form did I think any administrator is stupid. It was obviously my wrong, and I accept but I stand on what I say, I have no affiliation with those accounts or the person. How would I have knew that those articles had issues?. when I search for it I saw it didn't exist but the company founders does. Before I do anything here I ask for assistance and guidance from editors. I am very sorry,if the way I typed provoked anyone,I respect what you do and all I want is to be a part of what you do;being the eyes ,ears and mouth of the people both past and present,to become a writer of chronicles and history. I beg of you,I am not associated with those accounts or the articles, if my article writing style shows a form of advert I take the blame,and I'm sorry, for after learning, I will not receive a pay without disclosing it. DahSound (talk)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, I am unable to unblock you at this time. I recommend waiting at least six months before you again request unblocking. (You should not evade your block by editing the English language Wikipedia from a different account or while not logged in during this time. It would reset the six month timer.) It would work in your favor for you to constructively edit a different Wikipedia or Wikimedia project during this time, for at least six months and at least 500 edits. You will then need to concisely and clearly tell how your editing merited a block, what you would do different, and what constructive edits you would make. A list of Wikimedia projects can be found at META:List_of_Wikipedias . Before again requesting unblocking, please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks. Please read and heed any other advice you have received in unblock declines or discussions. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 8:41 am, Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
o
Please DahSound (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
I believe that you probably have no connection to the previous accounts or the person or persons who operated them. It is also entirely likely that you didn't know that the articles had previously had problems; you may not even have known that there had been previous articles. However, you did not independently come along and create new articles on the same subjects as previous accounts, all on your own. You were recreating articles for or on behalf of someone, virtually certainly as a paid contract. Who were you doing it for? JBW (talk) 22:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
"We have a WhatsApp group"; which other Wikipedia user accounts are in that group, and who was it who suggested you create this draft? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)