You are obviously not really on a vacation becasue you revert things all the time almost instantly evwen if the edits are not vandalism. So if you are not on a vacation then you should tell the truth and remove the template saying that you are on a Semi-Wiki vacation.
helped clean up some vandalism on your page--~~~~ 02:21, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
I added a vandalism warning here with Vandalproof, which I've removed. It seems that Vandalproof can do a revert right after you have reverted vandalism, and then it warns the one who fixed it. I only spotted it because it told me i was warning an admin. Kevin 13:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. You're fast. Anonymous_anonymous_Have a Nice Day 17:14, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
That's not really what I meant, because this user has only edited mine and his page. What I was thinking was that this was done delibratly so I would have trouble. Mahogany
Cowman109Talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to two other people, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding ((subst:smile)) to their talk pages. Happy editing!
Hi. Could you please check [[1]] who recently registered nick very similar to mine (I think he used different fonts). Could you please block this user? Thanks, SrbIzLike 22:30, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
STOP REVERTING MY EDITS-Taracka
Someone on wikipedia: I see the diff. The imposter was SrblzLike. You are SrbIzLike. The capital I and small l look similar, so that could happen. I know of another case like this.
You rv'd an IP a short while ago who had changed quite a lot of the article content. After your initial rv, the anon repeated his/her same edits. Another editor has made a few changes to the article since then. I am not a regular editor on that particular article. I only noticed it because it popped up in my VandalProof watchlist and I traced back a few steps just to see the recent edit history. From your last version to the current one, there appears to be large amounts of text missing including several citations. Perhaps, if you have time, you could take another peek and see if everything looks OK. I'd hate to see an FA suddenly go off track because of 1 bad editor. Cheers and take care! Anger22 00:09, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
17.255.240.78 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) See [2] -- Block if you see fit but please don't revert my talk page for it. Thank you. John Reid 00:53, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you've blocked the IP address of Bar Ilan University three times over the past week. I would like it if you would block for shorter periods of time, given that it is the IP address of over 30,000 students. Please note that Bunchofgrapes blocked that IP address for only 15 minutes, and there was no vandalism for hours after that. Please also notice that this vandal is trying to get the university blocked, and he has been placing fake vandalism warnings on the talk page for that reason. Eli Falk 14:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
One university, 30000 students? You guys need to upgrade your provider, this is 2006 - not 1999!
Whoa. 1 university haveing 1 IP. :\ I guess you really should have thirty thousand IPs, the vandal then will only block his/her own, not harming the rest.
Why do you keep changing the sickle and hammer? Please revert then back. Leave a message on my talk please. 128.54.126.222 19:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
I've sent you an email about this. --pgk(talk) 20:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
No it's fine! I think you're cool. — Knowledge Seeker দ 20:13, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, infinite block, maybe it's right way to protect ZETO resources like this IP ;-) . I think our Internet admin must discuss this matter with you, by e-mail or phone. Can you send me e-mail with your data? Reg., Ency response? 21:12, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Wow, today i don't find any row about bloking this IP at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Ipblocklist&limit=5000&offset=20000&ip=, that i saw yesterday at 21 UTC. Where i can find any info about deblocking and reason to taht action? Reg., Ency response? 06:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC) Of course, we must check our servers, but can you give any help about SQUIDWARD bad job, or say who can? Ency response? 22:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about reverting your revert -- I missed it in the history somehow. Please accept my apologies. TheProject 01:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Curps, you wrote in Pan-STARRS "Also, among currently known comets there is a bias favoring those with short perihelion distances. Overcoming this current observational bias will enable a more complete picture of solar system dynamics". AFAIK this bias comes only fom the fact that comets are brighter closer to the sun (and closer to the earth) - so the bias will still be there, although smalle and moe distant comets will be observed. Icek 02:04, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Another thing that I've just noticed: "data will be compared to remove CCD artifacts due to chip defects and bad pixels and cosmic rays, and then the light input will be summed to give the equivalent of a single 3.6 m telescope" - the "and" is not possible; either you use the telescopes to eliminate pixel errors, or you sum up the intensity to get greater sensitivity. Icek 12:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't know if you get a notice of these. Thought I'd share since it showed up on #vandalism:
* 02:20, 17 May 2006 Drini blocked "146.115.230.23 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 3 hours (vandalism) * 02:20, 17 May 2006 Curps blocked "146.115.230.23 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (vandalism)
Antonrojo 03:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
It wasn't popup's fault and even if I were to do it manually, it would have happened as it I wasn't in my best of alert minds when I did it. I was doing RCP and reverting vandalism. I guess some slips can occur with anyone. Anyway, thanks for pointing it out. I will be more careful now. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you blocked 147.91.173.31 indefinetly for being an open proxy. But, that unfortunately caused problems for contributors from University of Novi Sad, so I unblocked it. I understand that some vandalism originated from this IP, but I think indefinite block is a bit to much since some legitimate users like User:Duja use it... --Dijxtra 09:32, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
After having a conversation on IRC about you really being a bot, I randomly looked you your RFA. This (in response to Q1) made me smile: "Also perhaps occasional blocking.... So it would be nice to do such things myself occasionally without having to seek out an admin."
And to Q3: "I never get stressed out or emotional" <--See you really are a bot ;)
Anyway, hope you're enjoying your break, and you don't mind looking back at where you came from :) Petros471 20:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
--Sunfazer | Talk 20:50, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
A user has asked [4] that it be unprotected. Any thoughts? Tom Harrison Talk 00:06, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you've recently blocked this user for being an open proxy, but after receiving correspondence from him via OTRS, and checking the account contributions (there are none), I am unblocking him. Thanks. Bastique▼parler voir 19:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I had a page into which I put a huge amount of work reverted in less than a minute (see Therianthropy, and I checked your page and it said you were on vacation. Do you have a program that auto-reverts? I know you couldn't have looked over the amount of material I'd created in such a short time.Blue Milk Mathematician 00:06, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Durn it, you reverted me instead of the vandal!!! - CobaltBlueTony 17:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
This page is attracting more daily vandalism from an apparent single offender at the 195.93.21.98 space. Grusl 18:34, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
—G.He has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding ((subst:smile)), ((subst:smile2)) or ((subst:smile3)) to their talk pages. Happy editing!
—G.He 23:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for saving my userpage! --Xyrael T 18:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I was blocked by this user while having a dispute with him, an obvious violation of WP:BP, this user has abused his powers and is out of hand, as a non-admin, I feel it is not within my power to warn him, I was wondering if you could perhaps let him know he is breaking a Wikipedia policy, thanks.--GorillazFan Adam 01:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
oi u tosser wen u gonna unblock us from wikipedia u idiot —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.63.160.253 (talk • contribs) .
Greetings Curps, just thought you should be aware of this list as you are mentioned by name. Cheers. Netscott 15:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
just checking this user. I can fully understand the ban but perhaos infinite is a little extreme? would 24-48 hours not be a better and more realistic timescale? thanks Cicero Dog 21:04, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey, man, I think you should go check out the OC page. Someone done vandalized it. Clown shoe 04:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, could you pls take a look at India as an emerging superpower. These two POV-pushers (maybe the same sockpuppet) removed well-sourced contents (which is also supported by other wikiarticles including Indian caste system and caste)
I already warned them on Talk page but they only made replies with senseless excuse.202.40.137.197 09:06, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
It's probably a coincidence, but seeing as the name of that autofellatio vandal looked suspiciously like this one, perhaps we should keep a close eye on this account. - Mgm|(talk) 10:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello Curps.
Regards —Encephalon 04:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Could you please explain to me the block of ThomasK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? Thanks. --Cyde↔Weys 08:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, I hace confessed to vandalizing for the past several months, and for permanently scarring my reputation. I want to state now that Tex's contention that I haven't left is entirely false, I only came back on the 23rd to voice my opinion against RobChurch, and his RfA. Well, my attack: I am sorry for being the CIyde vandal and for my attacks on John Reid. I am sorry that I came here, stressing myself, and others out. To further emphasize this, I did create an account with the intention of it being constructive after a three month long meltdown. Hopefully, I will be able to edit constructively, and I am sorry for all the trouble I cause. Yes, people reform, and to be honest, the point of the vandalism was to attract attention to what I see as incivility, and the reasons several of my friends have left here. But vandalism is vandalism, so I better quit before I get in trouble. I am sorry I was ever apart of the project. I DONT want to be a Brian Chase. But, at least I did edit here constructively for a year and three months before I went haywire.εγκυκλοπαίδεια*14:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
As stated on [7] you are the one who operate(s/d) the block bot against WoW. Would you please be so kind and send me the source code?
Regards, HardDisk 18:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
He's protesting your last indefinite block. I removed his ((unblock)) template and told him that there was no chance of me unblocking unless he pledged to stop adding nonsense (he does seem to have made proper contributions in the past), to which he responded with a rather nonsensical apology. See for yourself and decide if you're convinced. --Sam Blanning(talk) 14:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
After some brief strife, he's changed his apology to one which, to me, sounds fairly sincere. I would still like your thoughts on whether the indefinite block is warranted. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:58, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Since you haven't responded one way or the other, I've gone ahead and unblocked him. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi, Curps. I see from your user page that you're on semi wikivacation, so I won't blame you if you don't answer this. A user For_great_justice. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) was blocked for 3RR, and continues to be abusive on his talk page. I was looking for his (or her) user page, and forgot the dot at the end when I was typing it, so I got the page of For_great_justice (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was blocked by you in February. It seems suspicious that this user would have such a similar name, and I'm wondering is an indefinite block in order. I notice that there are no contributions for the user you blocked, but I have sometimes found it necessary to remove contributions from page histories, or to delete newly-created articles, while blocking vandals, so I presume that was the case here. It makes it difficult for me to judge the connection of the new user to the old one, though. Have you any recollection of the case? Thanks. AnnH ♫ 23:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey...
I am one of the people who run the Darkonin, a kingdom in the online Mud Dark and Shattered Lands. Some people are trying to get it deleted due to lack of "notablility." I got your name off the World of Warcraft history, if you would post on the talk page about how it is sort of notable, as if that isn't notable, neither is anything about World of Warcraft, or many a fantastical novel.
Thanks.
Can you delete my talk page's history? You'll the only one who will do it. (Oahc)
I believe Joshbuddy was testing a bot. He has since been unblocked. NSLE (T+C) at 07:21 UTC (2006-06-03)
I am getting set to leave for New York City by 11 o'clock. I won't be with you Wikipedians until tomorrow morning. After clearing my user page, my next edits will be based in America.
So long...and thanks for all the fish. Bye! --Slgrandson 10:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I would appreciate it if you would actually check what you are reverting. You reverted Discospinster after he undid a paragraph deletion. You then reverted me when I tried to fix your mistake.--67.15.151.90 21:11, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Curps, it is my conclusion that you are running an anti-vandal bot with rollback on this account. As this does not seem to have been documented, discussed, or approved, I have raised the issue for discussion at WP:ANI. Dragons flight 22:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I find it extremely interesting that you haven't responded to any of these accusations, yet you still manage to block numerous accounts with the generic summary of "vandalism" (and I know that you're active right now and that you have read this page). If you ARE running an unauthorized bot, you should at least have the integrity to admit it. I know that you're very smart, and you probably don't care about what a measly IP address user thinks, but the level of cockiness that you are showing right now will eventually be rejected by the community. It's ok to be rogue, but it's another thing to think that YOU make the rules 141.151.12.23 03:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I was blocked since March 16th and i just knew that. Can I even know why i was blocked? They say i might be a zombie! Well, ain't we all walking deads? Think about it WIKI!
See this justification for my imposition of a twelve-hour block on this apparent bot.
Please participate in on-wiki discussion. --Tony Sidaway 22:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Sometimes I wonder if people thank admins for taking quick action against obnoxious vandals. Thank you. SchmuckyTheCat 06:28, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I didn't see I was removing most of the article when adding Yiddish language. Anyway, can I add Yiddish again (and this time I'll use preview)? Psychomelodic (people think User:Psychomelodic/me edit)
I rv'd the Pink Floyd blanking at the same time as Tawkerbot. It rv'd back to the anon and gave me the warning. I noticed you corrected it. Can I rm the test from my talk page? Thanks, cheers and take care! Anger22 13:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, was looking for an admin on recent changes and you were the first I saw. Anyway, would links such as this be considered spam? Judging from his userpage he's only adding them to promote his site, although I was hesitant to remove it as there are lots of other fansites already under External Links. None of the content on his website is original or unique - it is all available on the numerous other websites in that section. Thanks -- Steel 21:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
I know websites can be blacklisted through meta... can the same be said of phrases, like, oh, say, "shinigan down"? :) RadioKirk talk to me 23:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Hey, you're inadvertently putting the vandalism back in when you revert me. NawlinWiki 03:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
I think there is a sock puppet of Johnny the Vandal his name Johnny the Punk he was on the spanish wikipedia. Leave me a message on my talk page if you need more info. -- 70.171.190.17 22:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
SOCKS!!!! SOCKS
Oh I forgot it is very similiar to Johnny the Vandal's vandilism. -- 70.171.190.17 22:36, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Having blocked User:Communism on wheels, you might want to block User:Wheels are Communism as well. Wikipeditor 14:22, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Greetings, Curps. As a frequent target of bad username creation, I would appreciate your opinion at Wikipedia talk:Changing username#Proposal to warehouse insulting and offensive usernames. bd2412 T 14:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I just created a page Bruce Devlin saved it, went back to work on it and was blocked. Autoblocked - due to L337Ninja vandalism- IP address 152.163.100.198--Hokeman 15:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Your bot blocked me for moving a test/joke page to a title with ON WHEELS! in it. My username is Mr. Lefty, and I'm editing anonymously from my IP. Help? 24.10.142.25 00:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Never mind, taken care of. Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 04:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
.Angela (talk · contribs) didn't seem likely to be an impostor of Angela (talk · contribs), so I've unblocked her. The blocking policy states that we should be sure that such accounts are malicious impersonators before blocking them, as people might choose names similar to that of other users without any ill intent. --Ixfd64 19:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
*Also, I'm not sure why you think that Rockeró (talk · contribs) and Róckero (talk · contribs) are inappropriate usernames. I'm going to unblock them. --Ixfd64 22:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
All of his edits that i have looked at are vandalism so i gave him a ((subst:test4)) warning but that doesnt block him does it because im not admin???. I know that you are meant to warn at first but it is obvious vandalism.--Childzy (Talk|Contribs) 17:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I think this user is not a Willy on Wheels sockpuppet. He moved three pages to the respective Occitan name, because he probably thought he was on the Occitan wikipedia. Just my thought. Canderous (Talk) 12:32, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
24.106.127.42 keeps vandalizing random pages. (S)he has been blocked for 24 hours numerous times, but keeps coming back. Can you do something more permanent, please? --Sangild 09:58, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Hi there, do you know anyone who can help me in creating a wikiproject on hard rock. (BritisH PunK 20:57, 21 June 20
This user has sent an e-mail to the unblocking list as follows. "User Curps has blocked me as "with an expiry time of indefinite [8] (((Blocked proxy)) or zombie." This is my own home IP address, it's not an open proxy or zombie address at all. My IP is 203.87.64.214.
Could you please advise of the background so that we can respond to him?Capitalistroadster 10:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Chadbryant said you had helped him out earlier over harrassment from sockpuppets. He's now experiencing some problems and I wonder if you would be able to take a look? I realise this might not be possible for you at the moment and any information you might be able to provide me with would be helpful. If you're not able to do that, I will understand. Thanks. Tyrenius 23:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
I would be grateful for your assistance. I understand that you blocked an IP address 68.83.73.90. Ernie Costa who uses that address claims that he hasn't edited anything and would like to be unblocked. Are you in a position to advise of what we should do so that we can respond to him? Capitalistroadster 06:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy it, Curps. [9]. I have greatly appreciated your work here, as we all have. Antandrus (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Yes, enjoy your break very much. I too apreciate all the good work you have done.--Dakota 03:59, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm very sorry that I never got a shance to meet the real live Curps. But someday, perhaps we shall meet. Until then, good luck! ~ Flameviper 00:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia keeps saying my IP address is 219.?? when it is actually 67.168.75.27.
Can I refresh the server? Because I can't edit, and I'm innocent (SP).
Assistance please?
--Köln 01:47, 4 August 2006 (UTC)Köln
On 6:44:59 PM (PTZ) Thursday, August 3, 2006
Hi There! Can you translate my name in what language you know please, and then post it Here. I would be very grateful if you do (if you know another language apart from English and the ones on my userpage please feel free to post it on) P.S. all th translations are in alpahbetical order so when you add one please put it in alpahbetical order according to the language. Thanks!!! Abdullah Geelah 13:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
210.0.201.213 is the IP that I frequently use. I request to unblock this IP or change the unblock to anonymous users only.--Hello World! 10:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
The IP 64.233.172.21. is the one I use. Please unblock it right away. Edraf 09:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
How can I be blocked before I even write my first article? I typed the title (Restitution Transfer and Recoupment), hit enter, and got a "blocked" message - User:JLMadrigal 8:31 15 August, 2006
I noticed that about a year ago, you moved a bunch of articles related to Malta to variants with diacritics in the title. However, you failed to fix the indexing sort keys so that they are sorted properly in categories. I hope you are not still doing things like this, so I am pointing out the need to do so for future reference. See Wikipedia:Categorization. Gene Nygaard 13:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
I know you're on a vacation, but just in case I catch you around, I noticed a while back you moved Tejat Posterior to Mu Geminorum. I have put a proposal at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#Stars which you might be interested in contributing. Thanks! AndrewRT - Talk 00:17, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
I am new to wikipedia and i would just like to say hello Curps. If you ever need help i will be ready to help you Count Raznagul 00:49, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I was autoblocked. Here is the message: Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Curps for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "TwixDawg". The reason given for TwixDawg's block is: "vandalism".
Your IP address is 64.233.172.2.
Please do the needful to unblock me. Thanks Kprateek88 08:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Do you keep your user page protected because you block a lot of offensive usernames and vandals indefinately.
I reverted some vandalism on this page. DavidJJJ 13:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
The WP:SRNC poll has concluded (with the exception of one state, and this minor dispute has nothing to do with article name). Therefore, mass page moves pursuant to WP:USSH will be taking place. Please do not block any of these users, as these moves are not controversial. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I added ((tfm)) in each page above because I believe they both look similar to each other, even when each is in different order. So I don't know which we must use very often. --Gh87 02:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
In April, you had blocked Qwertysoup for page-move vandalism. However, they had only done this once. Do you think it's time for an unblock now? --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 20:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
I regret not being around to meet the real live Curps. However, I'm sure you're aware that you're a legend around these parts. I admire you, what with your 44,000+ edits. Whenever you do come back, Curps, I'll be waiting! ~ Flameviper 00:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Sd31415/Thumb
You are the biggest contributor to the Wikipedia article! s d 3 1 4 1 5 talk • contribs 02:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
I am a user of Chinese Mainland and I have to use the Tor network to bypass The Great Firewall. Would you please do me the favor to unblock me?
UserName:Zhangyunfan
UserTalk:Talk
I know you don't much edit anymore, but I would like to no whether a user named (anonymous) on MediaWiki was you. He claimed to be you and seemed to sound like you (refusal to give personal inforamtion, interested in unification bots, etc.)Peatbog Sergeant 01:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
...for you to come back. :-) Khoikhoi 00:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
It's been months now, and I think the amout of vandalism is less thanj it used to be. Peatbog Sergeant 04:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Please unlock this user user:Mr Lord for i want work to article Perry Rhodan and Atlan. You can contact me in fr:user:Mr Lord. Thx Mr Lord
![]() |
The Purple Star | |
Given in recognition for having one of the most vandalised user pages. Timrollpickering 03:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC) |
I unblocked User:Garygarfield whom you had blocked almost a year back. You are not active these days, so could not contact you first. If you disagree, do not hesitate to bring it up with me. Cheers, and if you reading this means you are back, then "Welcome back". :) --soum (0_o) 10:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Antitheism may be adopted as a label by those who take the view that theism is destructive. An alternative term for this stance is militant atheism but not in a violent militaristic way.See: Antitheism Kope 14:18, 11 April 2007 (UTC)