Hello, Concernsavant! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 12:02, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your edit to User talk:Concernsavant has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Please quit copy-pasting content from other websites; we cannot accept it anywhere on Wikipedia. And, as you have already been told, Quora is not an acceptable source. (I cannot assess the book due to the language barrier; a German-speaker with a copy of the book will need to do so.) —Jéské Courianov^_^va little blue Bori 19:19, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Once again, anything Lindall writes is useless for notability due to his connexion with Banez. And I've just had to remove yet more copypasted material. —Jéské Courianov^_^va little blue Bori 03:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The lot of these sources were discussed and dismissed, and your IP address was blocked for a week for refusing to heed that criticism. If that happens to your account, the block is more likely to be much longer than a week. Lexikon-surreal is under Banez' control, and the book page provided is a passing mention that says absolutely nothing of consequence about Banez. —Jéské Courianov^_^va little blue Bori 04:47, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
POSSIBILITY-- Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is a male artist. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr.’s first verified exhibition was Selected Contemporary Works from the Permanent Collection Part 2 (2002-present) at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2009, and the most recent exhibition was WAH Salon 23rd Anniversary Show at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2022. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is exclusively exhibited in United States. Banez Jr. has at least no solo shows but 18 group shows over the last 13 years (for more information, see biography). A notable show was Togetherness & Oneness at WAH Center (Williamsburg Art & Historical Center) in New York City, NY in 2021. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. has been exhibited with Susan Jacobs and Mary Westring. Bienvenido Bones Banez Jr. is ranked among the Top 100,000 globally. Banez Jr.’s best rank was in 2022, the artist’s rank has improved over the last 10 years, with the most dramatic change in 2014. For a complete illustration of the artist’s career since 2009, please see the career chart on the trends page. https://artfacts.net/artist/bienvenido-bones-banez-jr/547969Concernsavant (talk) 07:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Be careful about "Lexikon Surreal Edtion One & Two listed here in Lexikon Surreal are part of Surreal Dictionary and KunstHerz are part of the Scholarly books and take note the word from german is "Lexikon" in Englis- "lex·i·con" a dictionary, especially of Greek, Hebrew, Syriac, or Arabic:
"a Greek–Latin lexicon"
synonyms:
dictionary · wordbook · vocabulary list · glossary · wordfinder · reference book · phrase book · concordance · thesaurus · encyclopedia
Hello, Concernsavant!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:25, 26 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for your time with appreciation and encouragement. Concernsavant (talk) 01:34, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello Concernsavant! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Legoktm (talk) 04:00, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bienvenido Bones Banez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). StarMississippi 15:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Discussion about this issue of Why Wikipedia Bias? we know the reality and here's from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2378023118823946 about WHO COUNTS AS A NOTABLE SOCIOLOGIST ON WIKIPEDIA, GENDER, RACE, and THE PROFESSOR TEST Our world bias and Wikipedia its seems turning Technocratic Wickedpedia Totalitarian Regimes. Concernsavant (talk) 03:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Are you even reading what you're writing? The above is word salad and whatever point that paper makes seems to be irrelevant here since your focus is on a painter, not a sociologist. —Jéské Courianov^_^va little blue Bori 03:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Same as artists, sociologist and other important notability, the irony here porn star considered in wikipedia notability? laugh out loud hahaha Concernsavant (talk) 03:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]