Hi, Colonel here. If you have any questions or issues to raise, please feel free to post.
Your mission statement for Wikipedia states that you are here for the truth. Perhaps you should read the Wikipedia policy WP:Verify to familiarise your self with what the policy is on the 'truth' before continuing your mission. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox WP:Sandbox. --Jonathan Bishop (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
I have been watching the Jonathan Bishop posts. I would urge you to check his claim of scholarly notability. I have used Harzing's Publish or Perish (free downloadable software) and searched on Bishop's name in two broad categories: Social Science, Humanities and the Arts; Computing, Engineering and Mathematics. I could found 4 scholarly references to one paper: "Increasing Participation in Online Communities". It was in a real journal: _Computers in Human Behavior_.
Mr Bishop used to make broader claims as to his notability in the Virtual Community page. When I questioned him on this, instead of responding with documentation, several attacks were launched on a person I know well who has a Wikipedia page.
You might also check the edit history of User:Welshaspie. Bellagio99 (talk) 02:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
An article you have an interest in, Jonathan Bishop, has been nominated for deletion. You might wish to express your opinion on the proposed deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jonathan_Bishop_(3rd_nomination). Pontyboy (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
Why does this guy get to use Wikipedia to post his resume?
He is clearly engaged in self-promotion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.185.151.92 (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Character theory (Media). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
I suggest, Colonel, you refer to Wikipedia:BATTLE and keep any private dispute I may have with you and your Belgian family off Wikipedia. If you want to experiment please use WP:Sandbox --Jonathan Bishop (talk) 11:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)