This is Canaryman123$'s talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Canaryman123$!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
|
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 05:52, 14 December 2018 (UTC)Hello. Do you think we would benefit from an article on the Ballantyne wool family? Although Ballantyne is tagged as a surname list, the extensive list of places and other meanings mean that it should really be a disambiguation page. Almost all of the entries have the required blue links except for the wool people and their company. Would it make sense to assemble the information from there, The Kirna, Walkerburn and any other relevant articles in one place? We could then create redirects from the unlinked people. Many of the pages which link to Ballantyne refer to the family rather than the surname in general, and those links could also be diverted to the new article. I'm not sure of the best title because there are other Ballantyne families. Normally I'd put this sort of request on a WikiProject page, but we seem to have a clear subject expert in this case. Although I have plenty of edits and am happy to help with wikifying, I'm not really an article creator and don't know the topic. Certes (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
In response to your request for assessment at Wikiproject Scotland, I have looked at the article and agree it meets B Class, which is its current assigned Class. Overall, a fascinating read on a a Category A piece of Scottish history, so well done. I think with some general copyediting, you would be close to meeting GA Class if you are working towards it (for more details see Wikipedia:Good articles). My suggestions for improvement would be to look closely at the image selection as it is perhaps a little cluttered, consider a slight restructure (see templates at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Architecture#Help_for_authors for more detail) and importantly closely look at the content to ensure that it does not read as original research (which in most cases it does not as there are good references). Overall though, a fascinating architectural read. Coldupnorth (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2021 (UTC)