This is Barron Mickey's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
thanks Legacypac for the feed back.. i added some more citations, whith news articles.Barron Mickey (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Your addition to National Heritage Life Insurance Company has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Natureium (talk) 01:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. Hut 8.5 21:28, 11 September 2019 (UTC)Barron Mickey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not vandalizing any pages on Wikipedia, I was editing and updating pages that i am doing research on and user:Galatz keeps on vandalizing the pages, please unblock me.. Thank you
Decline reason:
It appears you've been making POV edits to the article at Sholam Weiss for quite some time. Today, you began replacing a tempalte you did not like with an imaginary one. I assume this is some form of POV commentary. You then began making more POV edits, and then stalked another editor to a page he had been edting to vandalize it and add a tit-for-tat tag. All the while accusing a long term editor of vandalism? This is not a convincing unblock request. Kuru (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. - FlightTime Public (open channel) 17:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian, as you did at User talk:Galatz. - FlightTime Public (open channel) 19:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Barron Mickey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please unblock me from editing sholaom weiss page. Administrator Hut 8.5 must be in cahoots with User:Galatz and might even be the same person, User:Galatz deleted 85% of the sholam weiss page yesterday i complained to administrator Hut 8.5 did nothing, he said i need to talk it over with other editors,. once User:Galatz deleted everything he did i took off the COI. sholam weiss's page has been referenced and edited by 100s of people for the past 15 years, but in one hour User:Galatz deleted everything he felt was necessary, Administrator Hut 8.5 accused me of lying... look at history at sholam weiss User:Galatz yesterday clear says that he discussed with Barron mickey... https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sholam_Weiss&oldid=916053702 (see; 18:57, 16 September 2019 Galatz talk contribs 27,044 bytes +23 Undid revision 916037439 by Barron Mickey) Adding back tag based on conversation at User_talk:Barron_Mickey#September_2019)... please unblock me.. thanks you Barron Mickey (talk) 19:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Editor shows no understanding of what he did wrong, and no indication he plans to improve, and is attacking the blocking admin in his unblock request. KillerChihuahua 19:16, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Just because something is sourced, does not mean it belongs on Wikipedia, see WP:NOT. Also I did not say it was discussed with you, I pointed to the discussion where you were told what you need to do in order to remove the tag. If you look at the edit history I gave a detailed explanation on everything that was removed, yet without discussion or rationale you added it back. Just because something has been there, doesn't mean it should be kept. Most of what was removed was WP:OR ot where conclusions were drawn or WP:BLP violations. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 19:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Oh and lets not forget your clear history of block evasion [6] - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 19:18, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Barron Mickey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not deliberately disturbing the sholam weiss page, i was adding edits and fact of the case. please unblock me.. I don't have a unblock expiration. thanks
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. If you don't understand how your edits were disruptive, then we have no way of verifying the disruption won't continue if you were to be unblocked. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.