Welcome![edit]

Hello, Aidanis20! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place ((helpme)) on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 04:43, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Ways to improve List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 1996[edit]

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Aidanis20, thanks for creating List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 1996!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references providing substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2000
added links pointing to Dream (group) and Rob Thomas
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2001
added links pointing to Dream (group) and Jagged Edge
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2004
added links pointing to Jabba and Bow Wow
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 1999
added a link pointing to Rob Thomas
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2005
added a link pointing to Rob Thomas
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2007
added a link pointing to Diddy
List of billboard hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1958
added a link pointing to Jimmie Rodgers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2011
added links pointing to Dev and Sabi
List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2010
added a link pointing to Dev

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1997) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating List of Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1997, Aidanis20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Can you please add your source?

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 20:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of billboard hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1958 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of billboard hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1958 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:41, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you should probably refrain from creating any more of these types of lists until the AfD has completed. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you not see that there is a discussion going on regarding all these lists you are making? Please do not create any more such lists until consensus about their appropriateness has been determined. Thank you. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You do realize that all the Hot 100 top 20 lists are going to be deleted, so why keep creating more? --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Billboard hot 100 amount of top 10 peaks per year[edit]

The article Billboard hot 100 amount of top 10 peaks per year has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and clearly WP:IINFO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2017 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Deletion[edit]

Hey, your articles on Top 10 hits on the Mainstream Top 40 chart are up for deletion, aren't you going to comment and defend their inclusion? They must have taken you forever to create. NYSMy talk page 03:17, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1961[edit]

The article List of Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks in 1961 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This was created after an AfD of identical lists for other years had started. This should be deleted following consensus of that AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard Hot 100 11 to 20 peaks).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated)) notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated)) will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 16:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USTop20s[edit]

Template:USTop20s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:49, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Billboard Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of 2008) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of 2008, Aidanis20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of 2009) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of 2009, Aidanis20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add sources to all articles, including lists.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of 2010[edit]

Soemthing's gone wrong with the creation of this. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aidanis20. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop[edit]

Template:Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

R&B number ones[edit]

If you need something to keep you busy, why don't you improve lists like List of number-one R&B singles of 1980 (U.S.). It may be better served to create List of number-one Billboard R&B singles of the 1980s for the entire decade. You can do the 40s through the 90s. Make sure you also add source the info from where you find it. You should have fun with that. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 00:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Mediabase number-one singles of the 2010s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halsey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know[edit]

Hello A. I see that you are making entries like this - https://https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8214735/drake-gods-plan-number-1-rap-urban-rb-hip-hop-charts - as a url for references. I wanted to let that they do not work. The problem is the doubled up - https:// - they work with one of those not two. See - https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/8214735/drake-gods-plan-number-1-rap-urban-rb-hip-hop-charts - Thanks for you work here at Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 17:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Billboard Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop number-one songs of the 2000s, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terror Squad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2018[edit]

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Aidanis20, thanks for creating List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2018!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs references for verification, especially given that this page is likely to need updating.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2017[edit]

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Aidanis20, thanks for creating List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2017!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs references for verification

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 23:33, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop[edit]

Template:Mainstream R&B/Hip-Hop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aidanis20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Aidanis20. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:R&B/Hip-Hop top 10 singles[edit]

Template:R&B/Hip-Hop top 10 singles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Canadian Hot 100 top 10[edit]

Template:Canadian Hot 100 top 10 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2017 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2017 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mainstream Top 40 top 10 singles in 2017 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 19:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2015" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2015. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 26#List of Rhythmic top 10 singles in 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]