Thanks for uploading Image:AMSS Colour Logo NEW.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:AMSSOrganisationalStructure small.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello! In reply to your question, we delete material which is copied from another source both to protect ourselves and the rights holders. Since all content on Wikipedia is released under the GNU Free Documentation License, we wish to make sure that anyone who is the authorized rights-holder does indeed understand that the material will be GFDL-released by posting here, and what that would mean. That means, among other things, that any images, logos, or text so released would then be usable by anyone without any further permission from you or your organization, either on or off Wikipedia, so long as they follow the GFDL's terms. (We do not accept permission-for-Wikipedia-only text, though under some circumstances we will accept an image under those circumstances, if it meets our fair use policy. Generally we will allow an organization's logo under fair use, especially if the organization in question explicitly states they do not mind.) As I do not personally have a means to verify your identity, I cannot restore the material at this time.
However, it is generally better to write an article about the organization based on published sources which meet our reliable source guidelines, and are independent of the organization. Normally, an organization's own material tends to be promotional of that organization, and of course while one would expect that, we require that all articles be written in a neutral tone and non-promotional manner. If little or no independent source material exists regarding the organization, it is probably not an appropriate subject for an article. Of course, an article so written also doesn't require any release of copyright for any of your organization's material.
If you do still wish to release any material under the GFDL for use in the article, the easiest way to do so would be to post a notice on your organization's site, or the page(s) you wish to release, explicitly stating what material is so released. In that case, we can be assured that the organization has indeed authorized licensing the material under that license.
Hope that helps! If you have any further questions, please feel free to ask on my talk page. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)