This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

‹ The template Edit fully-protected is being considered for merging. ›

You neither requested an edit, nor is the page fully protected. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023[edit]

Hello, Abrarkhanjoy. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Awlad Hossen Eshan has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Wikipedia:Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 23:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 23:46, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi (October 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not pass WP:NPERSON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abrarkhanjoy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Hi. We all get upset when another editor is trying to destroy our work, but please stay calm and do not overreact, as you did here [1] and there [2] [3]. If the subject of your article is notable, the article will easily survive the WP:AFD discussion. Do not attack other editors. Materialscientist (talk) 07:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You don't own articles[edit]

Please don't post messages to article talk pages instructing other editors not to edit the articles. You do not own Wikipedia articles, and do not have the right to determine who may edit them. JBW (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. JBW (talk) 08:17, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need for care over edit summaries[edit]

With this edit you gave an edit summary saying that you were adding references, but in fact you weren't. Please be careful to make sure your edit summaries accurately reflect what your editing is doing. JBW (talk) 08:22, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent unacceptable editing. While some of the unacceptable edits you have made could conceivably have been made in good faith but mistakenly, some of them certainly weren't, such as moving another editor's user page in what looked like a revenge attack, hijacking an article and attempting to turn it into a promotional page on a completely different subject, and, most recently, removing an editor's comment from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Chowdhury Tithi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)). JBW (talk) 21:15, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.