Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Beshak Solutions Private Limited and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishekpareek24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Beshak Solutions Private Limited, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Abhishekpareek24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Beshak Solutions Private Limited, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the ((edit COI)) template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DoubleGrazing I'm not in touch with this compny directly, recently Beshak Solutions Private Limited company came in limelight and Beshak Solutions Private Limited is fighting a case with India's giant insurance company policybazaar, reference: (https://www.medianama.com/2023/12/223-policybazaar-defamation-notice-beshak) and at that time.

But yeah all the information i added i took someone help in this. Abhishekpareek24 (talk) 06:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:12, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jimfbleak, I respect your decision. As this was my first attempt at creating an article, I didn't read all the policies for new page creation, which is definitely my mistake. You were just doing your job, and I totally appreciate it. You were completely neutral.

I understand that this block is a learning experience for me, and I'm learning the policies and guidelines so that I can contribute to creating a neutral environment on Wikipedia in the future. I 100% respect your decision, but I promise I will not repeat the same mistake. This will be the biggest learning experience for me, and I would be so grateful to you if you could make this a temporary block instead of a permanent one. I'm new to this platform, and I'm learning something new every day.

So I humbly request that you please reconsider and see if you can make this a temporary block instead of a permanent one. I understand that your intention is to make this a neutral platform.

I guarantee that I will not repeat the mistake. Abhishekpareek24 (talk) 06:44, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The procedure for requesting an unblock is in the box above, use that. You should make it clear in your reason that you won't edit that topic or related topics again, and also give an indication of what topics you will edit if unblocked. An admin (not me) will then decide Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishekpareek24 (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]