Hi 86.28.234.5! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 19:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.UA0Volodymyr (talk) 19:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. User:Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)86.28.234.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You've been duped by an editor whose only intent seems to be disruption. I reported them days ago for repeatedly restoring problematic material to an article despite multiple editors removing it (WP:AN/I#User:UA0Volodymyr). But all you did was protect the article with the disruptive material in place. Despite this, you yourself have told them they are risking a block for their disruptive behaviour! [1] And yet, when this blatantly disruptive editor makes yet another blatantly bad faith post at a noticeboard, and makes yet more ridiculous reverts of my edits purely for the sake of disruption, you decide it's me that needs to be blocked? 86.28.234.5 (talk) 20:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There are legitimate reasons to have additional accounts, it isn't necessarily sock puppetry. You have no idea if they are illegitimately using mulitple accounts or not, and shouldn't be making that accusation without some kind of evidence. 331dot (talk) 07:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
86.28.234.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What you have said does not relate in any way to the situation. I have not been blocked for voicing suspicions of sockpuppetry; I have been blocked, at the behest of a user who was (and is) stalking my edits and reverting them all indiscriminately, for "hounding"! How the hell do you look at one editor reverting every edit another editor has made, and conclude that the second person is "hounding" the first? 86.28.234.5 (talk) 08:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You continue to impress, albeit dubiously, with your determination to miss the point so completely a reader might not realize one existed to miss. You are blocked for repeatedly accusing another editor of sockpuppetry without offering evidence anywhere or opening an SPI. That's failure to assume good faith and uncivil. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
86.28.234.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was not blocked for voicing suspicions of sockpuppetry!!! I was blocked for "hounding"! But I was being hounded! The user decided to revert all of my edits indiscriminately, and made multiple spurious requests for page protection while doing so, because they objected to one particular edit I (and others) had made. How the hell do you look at one editor reverting every edit another editor has made, and conclude that the second person is "hounding" the first? 86.28.234.5 (talk) 07:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're BKFIP. You're banned. This discussion is closed and talk page access is revoked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 01:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ymblanter, judging from the history of Kira Rudyk, Orkney, and Neofetch, the IP editor is right. I think they should be unblocked--were it not for this. Drmies (talk) 13:10, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. UA0Volodymyr (talk) 11:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Orkney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |