Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to War in Afghanistan (2001–present), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at War in Afghanistan (2001–present). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2013 (UTC) Thank you, I got it.22 Male Cali (talk) 20:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
You have violated the 3 revert rule. Please self revert. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
I have reported you for edit warring here Darkness Shines (talk) 19:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at War in Afghanistan (2001–present) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Legend of Zorro 19:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Please don't delete the hidden comment there - and please use edit summaries, you know how to use them. Dougweller (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Regarding your recent comments and edit summaries at Islam in the United States: Please keep in mind that WP:BLP applies to all parts of the encyclopedia, including Talk page comments and edit summaries. If you can't discuss the topic in a civil fashion, perhaps you shouldn't be discussing it at all. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Islam in the United States. On wiki we use the talk page to prevent an WP:EW. So before Pushing your version of things gain agreement. Because you are off to a funny start pushing your agenda around. You first had a problem with lack of non-Africans. I attended to that, and STILL you edit in a unwiki like way against the talk page. You do not need talk page for everything, but esp for controversial edits.--Inayity (talk) 19:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
When a senior admin gives you some good advice, telling her "you are wrong dear" is pretty foul. You're clearly frustrated. Wikipedia is frustrating, especially the first time you get involved in an editorial dispute. Some admins are capable of remembering this, and behaving in a friendly, helpful fashion to inexperienced, frustrated users. Moodriddengirl is one of them. Responding to her assistance with chauvinism is boorish, at best. 76.72.20.152 (talk) 20:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the trouble. But recent edit on Islam in the United States by a new user User:Brinkidiom have a familiar pattern has set off a few alerts. I would like to AGF but to eliminate doubt I have opened a Sockpuppet check--Inayity (talk) 21:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Please cease the racial language you are pursuing on articles that have nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It can sound very xenophobic. Pass a Method talk 14:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 23:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)22 Male Cali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
this is an unjust block. i improved List of American Muslims and Toddst1 abused his adminship by blocking me for 72 hours without any warning. what on earth is going on?
Decline reason:
Declined without review since you failed to assume good faith regarding the administrator's actions. Also see WP:NOTTHEM. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text ((unblock|Your reason here ~~~~)) below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 12:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC) |
22 Male Cali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Bbb23, you wrongly accused me of being User:Brinkidiom and now it's proven that i'm not him. i don't have a clue who that person is and what he's trying to do, i'm solo in wikipedia, and i don't edit much but just improve something here and there once in a while on my free time. the SPI should have revealed who User:Brinkidiom is. Todd1 unjustly blocked me right before i could go to the SPI and explain that Fareed30 is my main account which i use from being on a separate pc. according to Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, using one additional account in some cases is allowed. i did not use more than one account at Islam in the United States .... and in the Pashtun people article, it was a simple mistake, i undid image change accidently while logged on using Fareed30. [4]. i regret making that mistake because i knew it would create confusion and after it happened there was nothing to do about but just ignore it ... and i explained to admin Dougweller the problem and he oked it. see User talk:Dougweller/Archive 28#Reply. in other words, there were no problems between me and anyone on the Pashtun people article. I wrongly believed that wikipedia is some kind of a social or dating network for students, like Facebook or something, but luckily i realized now that it is not a social website so i will not create any other additional account. :) 22 Male Cali (talk) 14:24, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were using multiple accounts to edit the same topic area, sometimes within minutes of each other on the same page. I fail to see how this meets the subset of allowed uses included at WP:SOCK#LEGIT. That being said, even if we put aside any socking issues whatsoever you still have used this account to edit war and continue to blame others in your unblock requests for the fallout from your actions as an editor. Do you understand why your edits are seen as disruptive? How would you edit differently in order to avoid these same mistakes should you be unblocked? These are the questions that you will need to answer for an admin to consider unblocking your account. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
22 Male Cali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
See all my edits and not even once did i edit the same topic within minutes of each other on the same page. my edits were misunderstood by someone as edits of war but i had no intention of edit war with anyone because i already know that i'm not good with that. anyway, i will not use this account to edit the same page and i'll link it to my other account. i'll use this one for minor edits which i may use only in case i'm using mobile phone or when i'm on my older pc which has a defective keyboard. btw, i created this account for legit purpose, mainly to hide from my Facebook friends because they sometimes watch what i do in wikipedia.--22 Male Cali (talk) 19:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This account was properly blocked after a properly conducted SPI with a CU uncovered an illegitimate and disruptive account not previously disclosed. Your problems on Facebook are not of concern here. Toddst1 (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.