February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Aardman Animations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tiderolls 09:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David Ginola, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Bagumba that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:AutomaticStrikeout, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. AutomaticStrikeout 00:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been blocked temporarily from editing for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)), but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.183.128.42 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

If the reason given for me being blocked was vandalism or personal attacks then I wouldn't bother appealing because I did it. But block evasion? Wht does that even mean? 212.183.128.42 (talk) 00:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since your question has been answered, there is no reason to leave this request open. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:56, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The blocking admin made a mistake. He told me that he intended to click "Personal attacks and harassment." AutomaticStrikeout 00:24, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Mathonius. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Wade Keller seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mathonius (talk) 22:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:212.183.128.42&oldid=1081907424"