May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheeseburger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

A bottle of champagne for you![edit]

Here's to all the hard work put into the maternal sensitivity page! R-Bot6 (talk) 06:38, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


DYK for Maternal sensitivity[edit]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your work is also featured on The Star! Congrats! --PFHLai (talk) 03:59, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar award[edit]

The Teamwork Barnstar
For your work on improving the Maternal sensitivity article, alongside users Carina1205 and R-Bot6, I award you this Teamwork Barnstar and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. SilverserenC 09:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you![edit]

:D awesome! Khyati Gupta (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Fundamental assessment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 19:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fundamental assessment[edit]

I came across your article Fundamental assessment while trying to clean up links to disambiguation pages. Unfortunately, I have to admit that the subject of "Fundamental assessment" is way out of my comfort zone. In plain English: I don't have a clue how to solve the links. Could you take another look at the article and set the links to the right article instead of to disambiguation pages? Thanks in advance. The Banner talk 14:19, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]