Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.
Hi there -- your edit to Human chorionic gonadotropin has been reverted because it is not consistent with Wikipedia's editing guidelines (please see Help:Editing and Wikipedia:Five_pillars for more information). You might wish to put a message on Talk:Human chorionic gonadotropin if you are looking for feedback or a discussion.
Thanks, BCorr|Брайен 20:38, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Ok, thank you for your efforts.
Hello, I'm Escape Orbit. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to CatDog because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Pinethicket. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rocky Mountain oysters because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Pinethicket (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Capitalismojo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Acesulfame potassium because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Capitalismojo (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle on the Columbia, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:58, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello 198.232.211.130. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Battle on the Columbia.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply ((db-afc))
or ((db-g13))
code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: ((subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle on the Columbia))
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:01, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dominic Raiola because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 23:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of foods and drinks named after places because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 21:35, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Again, please stop your aggressive editing of Supremacy clause. If you do not agree with other people's edits, discuss your concerns on the article's talk page first. Do not change the good faith edits of others simply because you disagree. Drdpw (talk) 14:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
I am not reverting, I am editing as allowed. You are the one reverting my edits and not citing one of the reasons for a revert as required by Wikipedia. I would kindly ask you to not revert my edits without a valid basis. I believe my edits are technically correct but I am open to you communicating to me if you wish to share your thoughts with me. 198.232.211.130 (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:198.232.211.130 reported by User:North Shoreman (Result: ). Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Not sure why you would start a notice of an edit war when I was the one who restored your edit. Other than that, you and I have had no interaction that I am aware of? Is there something specific you want to discuss with me? 198.232.211.130 (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
I didn't revert any edit of yours. I have been ganged-up on by others for adding original material, this is true, but why you and not they would report me to Admin. seems contrived. I would suggest you wait until you and I have an actual controversy. As to the others they have only reverted my legitimate edits, why I do not know because they offer no reasons, which at a minimum would seem rather rude...wouldn't you agree? 198.232.211.130 (talk) 17:06, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
When I see behavior in Wikipedia like the behavior of IP 198.232.211.130, I am reminded of an old saying of mine regarding litigation: you can have the law on your side, the facts on your side, a good lawyer on your side, an able, honest and competent judge, and a fair and impartial jury -- and yet you can still lose your case. Being "right" about one particular point is not enough. Famspear (talk) 19:20, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
To the contrary, I am anxious to dialogue to improve the information presented in the article. But you both (and others) dog-in-the-manger attitude and actions are not professional, not in harmony with Wikipedia policy and in my opinion quite rude. Who throws to the trash the honest and sincere work of another and does not even bother to state why? As for "honest and competent judge, and a fair and impartial jury" I can assure you that you have afforded me none. I have made no claim to being right but I do claim to following the rules to the best of my knowledge. Please respect my edits and please take the time to address concerns in the TALK page as directed by Wikipedia policy rather then defaming my efforts. I will work with you in an honest and respectful manner and hope that you can reciprocate. Should I be banned by Wikipedia for malicious acts against me, rather than protection from such acts, then I will know it is not an organization that I would want to be a part of anyway. Kind regards... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.232.211.130 (talk • contribs)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. BethNaught (talk) 22:03, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015 Pac-12 Football Championship Game. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Arbor Fici (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Yakima, Washington— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Would that be the talk page where everyone except some fringe theory spouting anon says that it is NOT currently a commodity currency?--Khajidha (talk) 16:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John C. Frémont— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 18:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pasco High School (Washington), you may be blocked from editing. ... discospinster talk 20:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm WJ94. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ann Wigmore have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. WJ94 (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Someone using this IP address, 198.232.211.130, removed content without giving an explanation. Please always provide an informative edit summary when removing content from pages. If 198.232.211.130 is a shared IP address and you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors and further irrelevant notices.
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
Here are some other hints and tips:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or type ((helpme))
here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Ashleyknowsthings (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |