 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
You can’t use Wikipedia as a source or religious texts to make an argument
See WP:VERIFY and WP:NOR. Doug Weller talk 10:45, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Unless I'm mistaken, only the Watchtower claims that the destruction was in 607 BCE. But Wikipedia should present the view of the scholarly consensus as much as possible. On the other hand, it has mentions in some Jehovah's Witnesses related articles. I highly recommend reading the links provided above, but in short, Wikipedia material should be a summary of reliable secondary sources and cite them (more links: WP:RS, WP:CITE, WP:RS/AC). This is also true for holy scriptures, the interpretation or analysis must be that of a source rather than the editor's understanding. Wikipedia can also not be used as a source, it would result in circular "citogenesis"; Wikipedia is also user-generated (WP:USERGEN). —PaleoNeonate – 11:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)