Hello, I'm Bennv3771. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Your mistake was negligible, as you undid a perfectly relevent POI added to the `SeeAlso`, an interwikilink which is well sourced. Cease your flaseflagging, thanks.126.140.254.94 (talk) 10:07, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "interwikilink" is not "well sourced", it is a red link that doesn't even lead to any article. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at LGBT social movements, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Weizmann Institute of Science, you may be blocked from editing. You did no provide any sources that he "dropped out" and labeling him a "traitor" is NPOV. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:30, 22 August 2018 (UTC) I repeat the above. Please cease your hasty and uninformed deletionism. Jonathan Jay Pollard`s wikipedia article covers your falseflagging in depth.[reply]

No it doesn't. Jonathan Jay Pollard`s wikipedia article only says he "made his first trip to Israel in 1970, as part of a science program visiting the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot." It never says he was ever enrolled there himself or that he dropped out. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Singtel. Bennv3771 (talk) 10:46, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including adding contentious unsourced content to articles, and adding nonsense and patently irrelevant content to articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 14:28, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.