February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hi 109.52.60.7! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Jewish Currents several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Jewish Currents, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Innisfree987 (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jewish Currents. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've been asked by multiple editors now to discuss this change on the talk page. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Leonidlednev. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jewish Currents—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:11, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jewish Currents. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jewish Currents, you may be blocked from editing. Leonidlednev (T, C, L) 22:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jewish Currents. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:20, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:109.52.60.7 reported by User:Philipnelson99 (Result: ). Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring, as done at Jewish Currents.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~)).  Bbb23 (talk) 22:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:109.52.60.7&oldid=1204750455"