Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
|
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Torrens, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Median strip, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Road 84 (Iran), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:00, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dawood Ibrahim. Ekuftle (talk) 08:29, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Marina Khan (bowls), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:53, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Deen, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 08:38, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Please note that, per the verifiability policy, "the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material", and that "any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source".
You may also find the bold-revert-discuss guideline and the introduction to policies and guidelines useful.
Please also remember to avoid personal attacks.
Thank you. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 11:39, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
((unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~))
. BusterD (talk) 07:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)103.246.39.1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is unfair. This is not blp. This person did the crime and there is a source. I want another person to review the block.
Decline reason:
WP:BLP policy applies to recently deceased persons as well as living ones. You have placed this material into two different pages, been reverted, then replaced it, against consensus to include as measured in this discussion the concluding edit made by admin User:Daniel Case. The underlying issue as I see it is your frequent and casual disregard of BLP policy, willful and repeated violation as demonstrated by these redacted diffs. Blocks are not punitive, they are preventative. Your continuting to pursue these current insertions after reversion with no discussion demonstrates those repeated prior violations were not mere anomalies. If you were to agree not to further insert this sort of material, pledge to read the BLP policy, and refrain from taking further such liberties I would unblock you myself or allow any admin to unblock. FTR, I am always open to my blocks being reviewed by any admin. BusterD (talk) 10:07, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the ((unblock)) template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |