GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Hello Doug Coldwell, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you shortly. I hope you find my feedback helpful. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 00:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

2. Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	No copyright violation or plagiarism found.	Pass

3. Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

4. Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

5. Stability:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

6. Illustration:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Undetermined

• Inactive reviewer, second opinion requested on [Talk page]. Review is taken over.

Starts GA Review. The review will follow the same sections of the Article. Thank you --Whiteguru (talk) 23:42, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Observations

Document statistics

• HTML document size: 92 kB
• Prose size (including all HTML code): 9536 B
• References (including all HTML code): 21 kB
• Wiki text: 15 kB
• Prose size (text only): 5629 B (961 words) "readable prose size" as per WP:SIZERULE
• References (text only): 2808 B

Page Information

• Page views in the past 30 days = 128
• 90 day page views = 420, daily average = 5 views
• Date of page creation = 10:21, 16 December 2006
• Date of latest edit = 07:10, 24 June 2022
• Total number of edits = 77 by 33 editors
• Most of the edits on this page occurred in 2013 ...
• Bots on page noted; no Clue BotNT noted
• Internet Archive Bot has made 6 edits to this article.

Images

• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 6B.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 1.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 2.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 3.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 4.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:Rosenbach Eliot Indian Bible 5.jpg = Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
• File:General Lawes and Libertyes, Massachusetts 1660.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
• File:Bay Psalm Book 1651.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
• File:New England Memoriall 1669.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
• File:Sewall's Commonplace Book.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
• File:Call From Heaven 1679 cover.jpg = Fair use claimed: first publication occurred prior to January 1, 1927
• Images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales; Images have appropriate use with suitable captions

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

• Later Englishman Ratcliff ... my sense is Englishman is superfluous.
• imported Morocco leather instead of domestic leather → imported Morocco leather instead of using domestic leather (consider)
• In the section Boston, Massachusetts do we need a link to the Boston page?
• Unsure what the bullet point linking Holmes, "Collection of tracts" is present for.
• underneath the second gallery is a link to Increase Mather 1670–80 → this is for ?

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

• Reference 8 has been taken down by the Internet Archive
• Reference 23 goes to a blank page (view page source, there is nothing there)

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

• Considering the references and historical documents consulted, coverage is replete and focussed.

1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

• NPOV is preserved in this article.

1. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

1. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have no-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

• Yes, see above

1. Overall:

• Is there any information on the life and works of Ratcliff after he returned to England?
• Well scribed, await responses to queries. --Whiteguru (talk) 07:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)