1. Monsieurdl --- subject "doesn't deserve its own article"
2. Connely --- "this should be presented in the main article"
3. Svetovid --- "The term is not notable on its own"
4. Mhking --- "this appears more to be cheerleading for Paul than anything else"
5. Umbralcorax --- "I really don't forsee that it would ever need its own seperate article"
6. Golbez --- "since when do we give presidential campaign slogans, tactics, and movements, their own articles, except when extremely successful and only after the fact?"
7. Milk the cows --- Campaign article "already explains the grassroots effect of the campaign thoroughly"
8. Happyme22 --- "much of it is a slogan and does not deserve its own article"
9. JForget --- per Wastedtime (who later abstained), who at the time said "Topic can be easily dealt with within Ron Paul presidential campaign"
10. Southern Texas --- A straight up merge vote
11. Reinoe --- "this isn't notable enough as is to justify its own category in wiki"
12. Sharkface217 --- a strong keep with an "at least merge it" sentiment
13. Timberlax --- " I'm pretty much on the fence here but overall I think" (...) "it makes sense to incorporate it as a section of the article about Ron Paul's campaign"
14. DHowell --- a strong keep with an "at least merge it" sentiment
15. LonelyBeacon --- "Can someone explain why this candidate essentially has three articles about an open campaign?"

42 votes total (incl. 2 alleged SPAs --- User:Anappealtoheaven and User:Duchamps_comb, not including Wasted Time's abstain.