I am currently attempting to tag all tennis pages with Template:WikiProject Tennis, together with importance levels for all non-player articles. Once this is done, I can start thinking about classes. See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Assessment and Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Tennis articles by quality

• Categories -  Done

  tagged as Cat-Class, NA-importance

• Templates -  Done

  tagged as Temp-Class, NA-importance

• Disambiguation pages -  Done

  tagged as Disambig-Class, NA-importance

• WikiProject pages -  Done

  tagged as Proj-Class, NA-importance

• Portal pages -  Done

  tagged as Portal-Class, NA-Importance

• Images -  Done
  1. tagged all images in Category:WikiProject Tennis as Image-Class, NA-importance
  2. finding all the other images will be tricky, so I shall call this done
• Lists -  Done
  1. tagged many (if not all) as List-Class
  2. All should have appropriate importance levels

• Tournaments (e.g. French Open) -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Tournament years (e.g. 2005 French Open) -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Tournament events (e.g. 2005 French Open - Men's Singles) -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Shots and terminology -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Equipment -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• ATP seasons, WTA seasons and Tennis by year -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Tennis organisations, Davis Cup teams and Fed Cup teams -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Awards -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Court types -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Real tennis -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels, apart from players
  2. Not done Classes
• Wheelchair tennis -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels, apart from players
  2. Not done Classes
• Other forms of tennis -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• History -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Media -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Venues -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
• Coaches -  Done
  1. Not done importance or classes
• Players -  Done
  1. Not done importance or classes
• Any other articles I've missed -  Done
  1. All should have appropriate importance levels
  2. Not done Classes
  3. There were a fair few actually, most of which though had been created since I started the tagging spree

I think all mid-, high- or top-importance tournament articles should now be tagged as such - rst20xx (talk) 23:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

• Top = 11 -> 44
• High = 53 -> 134
• Mid = 71 -> 810

- rst20xx (talk) 23:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC) Well okay, not all mid, but all the events that should be mid, as opposed to the tournaments, i.e. all Masters/Tier I events and up but not all ATP/WTA Tour tournaments.

• Low = 116 -> 1002
• Unknown = 888 -> 499

- rst20xx (talk) 02:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

And today I did all the rest of the tourneys, and all the templates:

• Top = 44 -> 57
• High = 134 -> 138
• Mid = 810 -> 1005
• Low = 1002 -> 1748
• NA = 0 -> 339
• Unknown = 499 -> 382 (most of the remaining are players)

• Temp-class = 0 -> 309
• Cat-class = 0 -> 29 (going to work on that soon)
• Dab-class = 0 -> 8 (ditto)
• NA-class = 70-odd -> 0 (depreciated)
• Unassessed = 915 -> 2899 :/

- rst20xx (talk) 17:26, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Right, all the Cats and templates are now done, plus Portals and Projects. And all the lists are List-class:

• Top = 57 -> 69
• High = 138 -> 146
• Mid = 1005 -> 1022
• Low = 1748 -> 1755
• NA = 339 -> 1658
• Unknown = 382 -> 394

• Project-class = 0 -> 20
• Portal-class = 0 -> 36
• Temp-class = 309 -> 345
• Cat-class = 29 -> 1262
• List-class = 0 -> 70
• Unassessed = 2899 -> 2897

-- rst20xx (talk) 23:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

• NA = 1658-> 1857

• Disambig-class = 8 -> 140
• Image-class = 0 -> 56

-- rst20xx (talk) 23:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Made this page - rst20xx (talk) 01:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Davis Cup teams, Fed Cup teams and Organisations means...

• High = 146 -> 149
• Mid = 1022 -> 1048
• Low = 1755 -> 2021
• Unknown = 394 -> 385

• Unassessed = 2897 -> 3173

Okay, I've done lots and lots of fiddly bits, meaning that all that is left is coaches, players and anything I've missed. Rating these is somewhat subjective and certainly will involve looking at a lot of articles (as opposed to the other stuff, much of which you could give an importance level to by just looking at the name). So I'm simply going to tag them as part of WP-Tennis, and leave the importance levels up to others. So, one more (huge) step and my tagging spree is complete! Progress:

• Top = 69 -> 75
• High = 149 -> 204
• Mid = 1048 -> 1081
• Low = 2021 -> 2283
• NA = 1857 -> 1861
• Unknown = 385 -> 327 (a quick scan through and a few manual fixes, and I think this is now entirely players! Yay!)

• Unassessed = 3173 -> 3471

-- rst20xx (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I've just finished up with that last spree! Over 2000 articles! Final progress report:

• High = 204 -> 213
• Mid = 1081 -> 1102
• Low = 2283 -> 2517
• NA = 1861 -> 1918
• Unknown = 327 -> 2084 (All those players...)

• GA = 1 -> 2 (We inherited Mario Power Tennis!)
• Cat-class = 1262 -> 1314
• List-class = 70 -> 72
• Unassessed = 3471 -> 5491

And that's it! rst20xx (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

The tagging spree took WP:Tennis from this:

Tennis articles		Importance
		Top	High	Mid	Low	None	Total
Quality
	GA			1			1
	B	3	22	19	7	4	55
	Start	7	12	29	41	83	172
	Stub		2	15	66	112	195
	Assessed	10	36	64	114	199	423
	Unassessed	1	17	7	2	888	915
	Total	11	53	71	116	1087	1338

to this:

Tennis articles		Importance
		Top	High	Mid	Low	None	Total
Quality
	GA			1	1		2
	B	4	24	16	8	4	56
	C			1			1
	Start	11	13	33	53	62	172
	Stub	1	5	24	72	92	194
	List	5	50	3	14		72
	Assessed	21	92	78	148	158	497
	Unassessed	54	121	1024	2367	1927	5493
	Total	75	213	1102	2515	2085	5990

And, additionally:

• NA-importance = 0 -> 1918

and:

• Image-Class = 0 -> 56
• Template-Class = 0 -> 343
• Project-Class = 0 -> 27
• Category-Class = 0 -> 1314
• Disambig-Class = 0 -> 145
• NA-Class = 70ish -> 0 (all went to Template-Class or Category-Class)
• Portal-Class = 0 -> 36

I'd call that successful! 4652 articles newly tagged, and before I tagged the players, Unknown-importance was down to 327 articles, so I gave importance levels to most of the articles originally in there. rst20xx (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)