I think it is hilarious that Conservapedia was created to counterbalance Wikipedia's "liberal bias", when all it does in actuality is create a strong conservative bias. By this I mean that it counts scripture as truth, anyone who uses Wikipedia as a godless heathen of some sort, and self-aggrandizes on numerous occasions. It also locks any accounted suspected of "liberal trolling", which I guess means registering for the website and not actually making an edit unless it contains facts, instead of allegations. I thought I would check it out to see if it was countering the "liberal bias" by not putting any bias at all and being purely about the facts, but when I see articles about women who get abortions having a higher chance of breast cancer, and the atheism article being a Jesus pitch ("The writers of the Bible considered the existence of God to be self-evident..." That's like saying that the writers of Lost saying it's the best show ever. They have a vested interest.) when it's not talking about atheists and their suicidal and homicidal tendencies. I'm surprised that every article on the site doesn't have a blurb about how it was created by god, and the biblical verse that proves it. I'm done ranting, for now.Lorddragyn (talk) 08:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)