Evaluate an article Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead section A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section. Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? (It shouldn't.) Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed? Content A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another. Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Is the content up-to-date? Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Tone and Balance Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Are minority or fringe viewpoints accurately described as such? Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Sources and References A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books. Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Are the sources current? Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Check a few links. Do they work? Organization and writing quality The writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections. Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Images and Media Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Talk page discussion The article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Overall impressions What is the article's overall status? What are the article's strengths? How can the article be improved? How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Examples of good feedback A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Global Poverty and Practice

Sector article : Palliative care

Area article : Healthcare in India

India in Global Studies

Article: Ayushman Bharat Yojana

Global Poverty and Practice

Sector: I chose this article because it provides a comprehensive review of the scope and history of as well as the relevant practices and approaches in palliative care. I found the descriptions of the pediatric subspecialty of palliative care and the analysis of access and reach through popular media to be interesting additions.

Area: This article matters because it draws attention to healthcare specifically in India with special attention to the history of the country's health policy and programs for the employed and unemployed. By splitting by regional interventions and distinction between rural and urban areas, this article proved to be an interesting read.

India in Global Studies

I chose this article because it outlines the history, features, implementations, and challenges of the Ayushman Bharat Yojana program effectively as a public health insurance scheme designed to provide free access to health insurance coverage for people who are categorized as low income earners.

Sector article:

Content

Everything included in the article was relevant to the topic of palliative care. However, a description of geriatric palliative care and interventions in that field could have included considering a section on pediatric palliative care was available and a large percentage of the elderly population face life-limiting illnesses anyway so information on approaches specific to that population should have been available. Although some interventions and symptom management was discusses in reference to all patients seeking palliative, a section that went into even more detail, as done with the pediatric specialty, detailing communication and management procedures specific to the elderly could have been discussed.

Tone

The tone was pretty neutral. There were not any claims that seemed heavily biased.

Sources

The sources are largely neutral, support the claims in the article, and come from a diverse array of authors and publications.

Talk page

Conversations in the talk page largely pertain to minor article improvements to improve flow and redundancy and simplification of several sections that needed to be streamlined.

Area article:

Content

The article was provided great information about the healthcare system in India as well as relevant policy, regulations, and regional differences in access and quality of care received. It was additionally very well written and easy to follow with ample headings and subheadings. A history section could be added to follow the changes in India's healthcare system over time. What I liked most about the article was the attention to detail in accounting for factors specific to various regional areas, such as North and South India as well as rural and urban areas, in India and the focus on specific healthcare challenges such as pediatric and women's health and malnutrition.

Tone

The tone was neutral. There were not any claims that seemed heavily biased.

Sources

The sources are largely neutral, support the claims in the article, and come from a diverse array of authors and publications. Some of the sources are a bit outdated, but overall they are sufficient.

Talk page

The talk page is mainly composed of reorganizational conversations and peer reviews.

India article:

Content

The article explains the history, features, implementations, and challenges of the Ayushman Bharat Yojana program with information that was relevant to the topic of India's universal health policy and health insurance scheme. The topic is mostly up-to-date with the history section detailing information as recently as 2020, but if significant changes or updates have taken place since then, those should also be included in the article. I think that the inclusion of a challenges section was important in contextualizing the implementation of the program.

Tone

The tone was neutral. There were not any claims that seemed heavily biased. By presenting the challenges of the program instead of talking solely about the program's benefits, the article was able to remain neutral.

Sources

The sources are largely neutral, support the claims in the article, and come from a diverse array of authors and publications.

Talk page

The talk page consists of content revisions, with several authors proposing to merge content from other sources or update information to fit more current events.