Points are accumulated in the following categories. Although a Good Article or Feature Article is not our goal and thus has no impact on points, those that maximize their grade will hopefully produce such a product.
I will provide you with a school calendar in which you will highlight the days you actively edited the article. This does not include chatting with others or sharing Wiki-love. Although there is nothing in the rubric regarding the distribution of your edits over time, it will play heavily in my bias as I award points under the category… determined by the teacher. Also include a copy of your edit count, a meaningless document in the high-count extreme, but can speak volumes when the edit count is in the single digits.
100 – 80% / 79-60% / 59-40% / 39-20% / 19- 1% / 0% |
500pts 400pts 300pts 200pts 100pts 0 pts |
+50 / 49-40 / 39-30 / 29-20 / 19-10 / 9-1 0 |
300 pts 250pts 200pts 150pts 100pts 50pts 0pts |
+5 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 1 |
100pts 80pts 60pts 40pts 20pts. |
Bonus: If the image was created by you and uploaded to Wikimedia in compliance with copyright rules. An additional 5pts / picture up to a maximum of 10pts.
Bonus: If you persuade the original author to release an image for use in your article and it complies with copyright regulations. An additional 5pts / picture up to a maximum of 10pts.
A maximum of 200pts… to be determined by the teacher.
Bonus: Evidence of contact with an expert in the field, via e-mail or interview. Although such source cannot be referenced, they go a long way in helping you understand the topic. A maximum or 20pts … to be determined by the teacher.
A maximum of 200pts… to be determined by the teacher.