This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

• Whose work are you reviewing? Coleen - Autism Spectrum
• Link to draft you're reviewing: Autism spectrum

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Yes

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the content is relevant to the article about Autism Spectrum
• Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There are vast amounts of information provided on this topic. It is a wonderful resource and I believe it would offer a good understanding to someone who is searching the internet for more information about Autism. I do not see any information that does not belong or information that is missing.

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral? Yes, the content added was neutral and not biased
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
• Are the sources current? Yes
• Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? I did not find any grammar issues
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, the content was very informative and offered wonderful information to users researching the topic of Autism
• What are the strengths of the content added? I enjoyed the information added about bullying. This aspect of Autism (or any disorder) is not usually talked about often and I believe it is very important to bring to the forefront!! Wonderful contribution idea.
• How can the content added be improved? I do not see any improvements that need to be added.