The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.

This is Chrislk02's talk archive poage for the months of January, February and March for the year of 2007. Please do not edit these archives. Any changes will be reverted.

January[edit]

Help[edit]

On my user page I am trying to get it so that my minor links can be in a collapsable box like the one's you have on your page. Whenever you hit hide it hides everything on the page but I just want it to close my minor links. Do you know how to fix this? Please reply on my talk page. Thanks.--¿Why1991 ^{ESP. | Sign Here} 04:00, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

My competition[edit]

I am pleased to invite you and every person on Wikipedia to participate in my story writing competition.


Littleghostboo[ talk ] 07:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

AfD for LoPbN[edit]

You've been contributing on LoPbN, and might want to participate on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people by name (2nd nomination). The vote went as Del-ward as 8 Del / 2 Keep, and now stands at 12 Del / 11 Keep. I hope for a clear consensus to keep, and would appreciate it, if you care to weigh in. Thanks in any case, and happy holidays.
--Jerzy•t 18:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Esperanza[edit]

I don't know whether you know (and maybe I should have brought it up sooner) but Esperanza has been "deleted" as a result of this MfD. It may affect your userboxes in due course. I wasn't a member so was not aware of any problems, but it makes interesting reading. Looks like they are going to keep several of the associated projects, though. Bubba hotep 20:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Fraternities and Sororities Sandbox.[edit]

Do you have access to a copy of Baird's Manual of American College Fraternties? That should help on the founding dates as well as other information. Naraht 13:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

New State of Emergency[edit]

Ok, new state of emergency now. ;-) And yes, you should notify me (even though my watchlist does that) :-) | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 20:19, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

No need, Kreider. (Wow that sounded punkish compared to what I say alot XD) I've already got a 300 lead on you. Perhaps I could notify you when I WIN! )

Lol the above was all humor. check it out! D•a•r•k•n•e•s•s•L•o•r•d•i•a•n•••CCD••• 22:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Yakovlev template[edit]

Glad you liked it. :-) I'm currently spinning up one for Sukhoi and have a few ideas for others...

Ya gotta love those Russian planes! - Aerobird 14:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Jesus[edit]

I recently found that the Jesus article on Wikipedia is the first item that comes up when you search for "Jesus" on the world’s most widely used search engine, Google.

Please edit the Jesus article to make it an accurate and excellent representation of Him.

The Jesus article may be a person’s first impression of Jesus. It would be nice if their first impression was from a Christian or the Bible, but for so many in these new days it probably comes from the Internet. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thanks a lot.

Also, watch out to follow Wikipedia's Policies and guidelines. It is especially hard for the Three-revert rule and the Neutral point of view policy to be followed because of the nature of the article, but please follow these policies along with citing sources so that the article does not get locked from editing and can't be improved further. Thanks again. Scifiintel 17:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Tata Sky[edit]

I inserted a useful link on comparison of different DTH players in India in the 'External links' section which another user has been reverting continously or changing it with another link calling it vandalism. My purpose is simply to enhance the usefulness of the article with a useful link for other readers that I found on a blog.

I was tracking the article to ensure that he does not revert/change my external links everytime. He did it again and when I reverted back his edit, you have reverted it back to his version calling my edit a spam/vandalism. Why is it so? Thanks for your kind attention. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.184.185.45 (talk) 17:41, 3 January 2007 (UTC).

conversation copied from other talk page for reference

If you will notice, i reverted to a version before any of the edits began when neither of the links are there. A link to a blog is probably not a good idea as it is not a reilable source of information. If the other user adds the links, I will remove them as well. Hope this helped. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Congrats[edit]

12,000 eh? Coincidentally, the precise number of T-26 tanks built, ever! There, a "congrats" and a handy Wiki fact all in one! (I will be updating mine again soon) :) Bubba hotep 20:01, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Another wiki-break?! How you gonna get to 13k like that? :D Bubba hotep 12:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Template location[edit]

Yeah, I was wondering about that, I'm ashamed to say it took me a very, very long time to figure out how to do it - until I saw Template:Douglas airliners under the "See also" heading of the aircontent thing and went "d'oh!". :-) Now that I know how to do it I'll work on fixing 'em as they turn up. Also just added Template:Douglas aircraft to the X-3 Stiletto, so that's done (for now, anyway) - whew! Need to add the D-558-1 and D-558-2 to the X-planes template but that's a job for after lunch. :-) - Aerobird 16:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

how to make my own user box[edit]

I wonderd how to make a user box of my own please tell me!!!(P.S. Im User:Halo1232 02:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

RFA?[edit]

You aren't an admin 0_o I am surprised! It would be an honor to nominate you, you are extremely kind and civil, and an overall great editor. Good luck! — Arjun 19:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi Chris. Sorry for the long delay. Let me run through some of your contributions and do a quick review to give you my opinion. Best, Gwernol 19:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Good News![edit]

You will be a admin in a website im currently making!! Im sorry, but I cant tell you the name, YET. Fattdoggy 19:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Informal editor review[edit]

Chris, I've done an informal editor review for you. I hope this is useful. Best, Gwernol 21:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

My buddy Userbox[edit]

Do you like the new userbox I added? Thanks for being my buddy... Anyway, visit my slightly improved Userpage... :)Littleghostboo[ talk ] 07:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Fattdoggy[edit]

I am also trying to get Fattdoggy's block repealed, as I also believe his edits were in good faith. I'm currently appealing to User:Winhunter (the admin who imposed the block). Is there a better way of doing this? -- LukeSurl 12:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Bondpedia[edit]

I am a rep from Bondpedia (An online wikia dedicated to all things 007). I have recently asked 'Ernst Stavro Blofeld' if he would be interested and he said you might. Ask me anything about it on my talkpage.--Highfields 14:24, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

ISBN Correction[edit]

Hi Chris, thanks for the note on the Franklin, VA page. I am one of a handful of editors correcting over 2000 ISBN errors. The one in question comes up as short, not incorrect. Many isbn's show up that way. We have been correcting these so that a system robot can them convert them to the new 13 digit isbn's. I would appreciate your efforts to locate the proper 10 digit number. You can edit it in or give it to me and I'll load it. The bot that found the error in the first place, SMACKbot, left a template so citing the error. Once you fix the error, the template needs to be removed along with the "Cannot locate" statement. Then the error flag will go away. I am using some fairly powerful resources and could not locate the isbn. I did find OCLC codes. As a last resort, we probably would have dropped the bad ISBN and loaded the OCLC #. Thanks for the msg.Ekotkie 21:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Chris, see OCLC. EdJohnston 03:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Chris, as EdJ (another person in the ISBN correction business)has indicated, OCLC can be found right here on Wikipedia. The term, Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) comes from a library cataloging function. In many ways it is the system of choice within the world of Librarians. (I happen to be married to one and she just shakes her head at ISBNs and is also on a Wiki page) When you check your local library on this errant ISBN on the "Timber Tycoon" you will probably find that they also have additionally listed the OCLC along with an appropriate ISBN. I suspect that what has happened is that this is a limited production book dedicated to that area in VA. I was able to locate it with an OCLC #. Thank you for your gracious award. I'm just trying to help out the system and get that final roll over to the 13 digit system finished. By the way. I meant to explain a bit more on that number of yours being "short". What I have found is that a lot of our errant ISBN's seem to experience either the leading or trailing number to be missing and the bot merely marks it as "short". Thanks again for your assist and have a great day.Ekotkie 04:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Fattdoggy[edit]

I took a look at his contributions. My take is they probably are generally good faith, but a lot of them are extremely ill advised. The message to Jimmy Wales' talk page and the repeated edits to the Template:Wdefcon are particularly unfortunate. I can see why any admin would consider this malicious. I would likely have blocked him for disruption, though perhaps not indefinitely.

The best way forward would be a polite email to user:Winhunter, the blocking admin. If you, or another editor, were willing to mentor Fattdoggy and ensure he doesn't make similar mistakes in the future, I believe this would be help. If you do take this on, be aware that you would be to some extent accountable for Fattdoggy's edits, so you need to be sure that you want to take that on and that Fattdoggy agrees. Good luck, Gwernol 00:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Chris, as a friend, I would ask you to heed Gwenol's advice very closely. The user in question has made some very – odd edits lately. (Did you know about the template he used in the first example within your first days of Wikipedia?) Tread carefully, mon brave. I would like to assume good faith, too, but... tread carefully. Bubba hotep 00:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Santa is givin yo ass some coal! COAL![edit]

alright bascially your life is editing on wikipedia. WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN? C'MON! WE GOTTA SAVE 'EM! YOU BASTARD!

-santa —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.226.127.70 (talk) 13:55, 8 January 2007 (UTC).

Userboxes[edit]

Is it OK if I do some shopping in your userbox section? I need some more! :) Re: the message above: nice! Bubba HoTep 20:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Greek Life Template 2.0[edit]

OK, I've added ratings and ranking to the proposed template for Fraternities and Sororities, with the requirements to be found on the appropriate page. We're waiting on a transparent picture; is there anything else to be done to this template? I'd like to give it another week or so before making it an official template. Just leave some comments on the template talk page for the template. —ScouterSig 02:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey I've been working on Randall and Hopkirk (Deceased) I have written it up in several days from a stub into a fuller article and have started 11 episodes of it already. What do you think? Check out the article and all of the episdoes of one of the greatest TV series(along with the A-Team of all time Ernst Stavro Blofeld 22:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Ahem[edit]

Hey, guess what. Start looking behind you shoulder now. :) Bubba hotep 22:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Timber Tycoons[edit]

Hi, according to Amazon (ASIN B000JF398Q, ASIN B0007395WY , ASIN B000J9Y6L6) it is published by Southampton County Historical Society, Southampton County Historical Society, and Wiliam Byrd Press respectivly. The same goes for Abebooks. I would suspect that Southampton County Historical Society is the publishers and WBP the printers. As for the ISBN, 87-063258 is clearly not one. Possibly, if this was part of a series it may be an ISSN - ISSN 8706-3258. It is also possible that the book was published by two organisations simultaneously. Would you be able to examine the book again? Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 14:05 13 January 2007 (GMT).

Littleghostboo's Userpage[edit]

Care to come to see my newly created Userpage? It's pretty nice (I really don't wanna boast, but please give me comments on my talk page and sign my signiture book please!)... And the competition has changed a bit already...Littleghostboo[ talk ] 09:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

FATTDOGGY IS BACK! YAY![edit]

This is User:fattdoggy, how do i get my user page back to normal? (P.S. I'll put back the block sign)

Wikiwings[edit]

Thanks! :-) - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 15:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Aviation-terminology-stub[edit]

Hi - it has come to our notice that you have recently created a new stub type. As it clearly states at WP:STUB, at the top of most stub categories, on the template page for new Wikiprojects and in many other places on Wikipedia, new stub types should be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies, and whether better use could be made of a WikiProject-specific talk page template.

In the case of your new stub type, it appears to be a reasonable split IMO, but standard naming would be for aviation-term-stub, not aviation-terminology-stub. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there aabout its creation. And please, in future, propose new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 23:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for the barnstar, and for the kind words. To be honest, the stub creation procedure is meant to be a tiny bit off-putting, just to stop the huge number of ridiculous stub types that have been made over the last couple of years. Sensible stubs like yours aren't really any problem, other than things like their naming - but if if it discourages people from some of the dafter things that have been made in the past, it's a good thing :) Grutness...wha? 01:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

By the way, i have moved the template ((Aviation-terminology-stub)) to ((Aviation-term-stub)), changed all of the articles tagged with the previous to the latter. I am not familiar with what needs to be done to delete the old stub type. Does it qualify for speedy deletion or does it need to go through a formal stub type for deletion?

Well, since you were the only editor and it's no longer used, and you;'ve agreed to its deletion, it is speediable... so I just did :) Grutness...wha? 06:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Rating of importance[edit]

Hello, Chris. I would like to know on what basis you gave DO-254 low importance. Do you know it's the standard used for development of most avionics in (non-military) aircrafts today? I think it deserves at least a "mid" importance. The similar topic DO-178B, which is for software in aircrafts, should probably have the same importance as DO-254. Keep up your great work! Nordby73 22:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed category scheme update[edit]

Note: this comment is part of a synchronised thread. You can reply by clicking the [edit] link next to the comment's heading, or following this link. To ensure that you can see any further responses I make, add this page to your watchlist. Once you have replied, feel free to remove this boilerplate.

Hey Chris,

Seeing that it's been nearly a month and you haven't made any changes to my proposal, I'm going to go ahead and request 'ratification' of it on WT:Air within the next few days. If you'd like to make some changes of your own, let me know and I'll hold off on submitting the proposal until your done.

Cheers and good luck, Karl Dickman ^talk 06:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Yea, I have no problem with that. Sorry I forgot to follow up, i forgot to add it to a to do list and it just slipped away. overall i am fairly satisified with it. I think there may be some more categories that we overlooked but those can be added later after discussions and what not. Thanks again for the hard work, it is much appreciated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Bashkirian Airlines Flight 2937[edit]

Just a few comments (I withdrew my objection):

1. There r some newspaper articles, but I dont like newspapers too much (they dont get the numbers right sometimes)...
2. I think the "global concept of aircraft" shall be based on (and depends on) a sane (not necessarily prussianly strict; intuition may be as good as computer-like sobriety; but what we see in this BAL/DHL accident is too chaotic for my taste) set of rules.

--Homer Landskirty 16:40, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Coney Island Hospital[edit]

Why did you remove the prod tag from this article? I don't see any assertion of notability. RedRollerskate 18:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

For the barnstar I'm so new I didn't even know what a barnstar was - I had to look it up! DSParillo 20:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Edit reversion conflict alert!![edit]

Been in Culture lately?! :D Bubba hotep 15:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

maybye! Looks like vandalism is picking up. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Template tutorial[edit]

I learned more in 10 minutes from just stealing and modifying copies of your templates than I did in an hour of bumbling around the official wikipedia docs on templates. An example is orth 1000 words. DSParillo 17:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete Columbia University Mock Trial[edit]

Hello. An anonymous visitor to the Columbia University Mock Trial page removed the PROD tag and said, "this entry should NOT be deleted because CUMT is not a "club," but rather a nationally-ranked competitive team, such as the Florida Gators, who have an extensive page." In response, I have started the traditional AfD process. I hope you will be able to take the time and comment on the AfD Discussion. Thanks. JasonCNJ 00:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: sibling userbox[edit]

Hey, glad you like it. If you need the 6-siblings category, go ahead and create it yourself. grapħıte_elbow_β 17:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Comparison of IRC clients[edit]

I have removed your PD template from this article. Your reason for deleting it seemed condense to me, and I don't really understand why you think the article is "Not a product comparison" (quote from memory, please correct if it's very wrong). It contains a fair amount of tables comparing features amongst different IRC clients, most if not all of which have their own Wikipedia articles, and are well known and used by thousands of people in a lot of cases (notably MIRC, X-Chat and Irssi). So I don't really see how the page is original research, or self-promotion (as it is a comparison with only factual information listed). I apologize in advance for not being a frequent visitor (even though I have a user account), so it may take some time for me to reply to you here or on the article's talk page (wherever you feel fit to continue discussion if you deem that necessary). Best regards, Gijs Kruitbosch 21:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

RfA?[edit]

Hi Chris! I've been watching you since you showed up on the WP:HOLICTEST, and, judging by this, I think you're ready for adminship, if you choose to be nominated. If you do, I'd be pleased if you let me have the honor of being your nominator. Sincerely, AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 13:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Alright then, tell me when you are ready, so I may (co)nominate you. | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 13:20, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm glad Andonic bought the subject of edit counts because I believe young Chris is standing at 13263, whilst I am (after trying to catch him up for the last two months, avoiding editcountitis in the process) currently at 13268! Ha ha. Stick that one in yer pipe, Kreider! :D Bubba hotep 13:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Hahahaha, yep, you got me. I cant argue there. When things slow down a bit my count will climb again. COngratulations by the way! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Uh oh... Good luck to both of you in the "edit war" to come. :-) By the way, don't feel bad about turning down a nomination Chris, you know when you're ready. | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 13:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, that's great! You'll make an outstanding admin. I'll support as soon as you accept! | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 21:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

wha?[edit]

Why did you remove my Afi correction Aiav request? 1B6 16:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure why you think Chris did remove this request... it seems the user you reported has now been blocked anyway. Bubba hotep 16:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

my message was removed, and another one for someone else was placed by that user over what was my request. 1B6 16:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

It may have been an edit conflict, i.e. you both tried to put one on there at the same time and his over-rode yours. It wouldn't have been anything he did on purpose. Bubba hotep 16:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

That is probably what it was, an edit conflict. I have not removed any AIV requests. Thanks for chiming in bubba. (I was at lunch or I woukld have responded quicker). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XI - January 2007[edit]

The January 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 20:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Aircraft specification template[edit]

Hi Chris,

While editing the Short Seamew specifications I have come across something that may need to be catered for: height/width for carrier aircraft with wings folded for storage. I have added these two specs to the Seamew by interposing a "* line"; this looks sort of ok but messes up the preceding entry: the closing round bracket of the alt-dimension comes after the interposed line in both cases. Is there a clean way of inserting such lines into the template without messing it up? Many thanks. TraceyR 20:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Supplementary comments: it would also be useful to have a specification parameter for wing sweep (in degrees) (see Short Sherpa's recent history); the Short SB/5 had three different setting for sweep during its life; could this situation also be catered for? Perhaps a "minimum sweep" and "maximum sweep" would be good for e.g. the F-111 and other variable geometry wings. I realise that these suggestions add to the complexity of the template, but they would be useful. Thanks for your contribution here! TraceyR 01:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Good work![edit]

Hello Chris, You've been doing an outstanding job on Wikipedia. I was wondering if you're interested in becoming an administrator. I've listed you here, which means I hereby offer to nominate you for adminship, should you require a nominator. Regards, Húsönd 20:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Brilliant idea. And if you do I'll be the first (or the second) to support!--Rudjek 20:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I'll start working on it right away. I'll inform you when I've finished the nom so that you may answer to the standard questions and launch. :-) Regards,--Húsönd 20:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm done! :-) Please let me know just before when you launch your RfA, I am kinda hoping not to be beaten again. Regards and good luck! Húsönd 22:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You better be fast on that save button then, Husond! ;) Bubba hotep 22:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Chris, based on my review from a few weeks back, I'd support this RfA. I still think you might be better waiting another month to be sure, but I expect you'd pass this time around and you'll get my support. Good luck, Gwernol 22:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Hi again Chris. Erm, I think it says on the instructions for launching an RfA that it must be the candidate to place their own RfAs on WP:RFA. It is not complicated really, just change the date to +7 days and add it to WP:RFA. :-) Húsönd 00:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

I've supported now. Good luck Chris! | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 00:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

University of Michigan[edit]

My edits were not in anyway vandalism, they merely took out redundant material. Please read my edit summary and the article, and tell me if you disagree with my judgement.

71.238.69.7 18:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Just for reference. The diff in question is here [1] -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Just for reference. Here is my reply.

I have reviewed the dif here. What it looks like is there was a large, cited section, that was removed. I have read the article and the information may have been redundant, but the citations were not. Removing that section without moving the citations to the other section left the information on that topic unreferenced, and therefore subject to more scrutiny, and having the possibility of being removed. I have no problem with the removal, just along as the remaining materials get cited. If you would like any help with this, please let me know on my User talk page, and my apolagies on the warning, (Which I have removed). Hope this helped! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

3RR[edit]

The Ip vandal you warned the police article has vandalised the article 4 times. Violating the 3RR block. Retiono Virginian 19:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks! It's more meaningful coming from a great vandal fighter like yourself. Actually, I don't patrol recent changes or anything else; I just add the interesting pages at WP:MVP to my watchlist. I'm glad I beat you! ;-) | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 19:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Script[edit]

Hi again. I thought you might like this script, which adds a link to your toolbar for watching the article of the day. If you get an error message (as I did), read the instructions Ais523 gave me instructions on how to fix it here (soon, it will be archived here). I hope you like it. :-) | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 23:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

JSBSim[edit]

Greetings. As to your proposal to delete the JSBSim article due to it being a "Not notable open source project". I beg to differ (of course, I am biased :). JSBSim is the default flight model for FlightGear, has been recently incorporated into the OpenEaagles framework, and is used around the world by students and industry. It is perhaps the only open source flight model library, and was the first to use XML to describe aircraft models for flight simulation. The chief architect (that would be me) has spent the past 10 years coordinating an international group of developers on the project. Developing advanced flight simulations for space launch vehicles and doing ascent trajectory analysis is also my "day job".

If you could be more specific as to how you would like to see the article improved, I might be able to make time to do that. If you have other questions about JSBSim, feel free to ask me. You can reach me at jon *at* jsbsim.spamblock.org. Obviously, remove the ".spamblock". --Jonsberndt 05:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Mdcollins1984[edit]

Many thanks for keeping a watch on vandalism and reverting changes to my user page.

Best wishes,

Mdcollins1984 10:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. As of now, I do not care about the outcome of it, I did not even ask to be nominated. I however would like to clear up a misunderstanding. I at no point claim that I plan on using reversion tools to handle content disputes. I made a mistake on RC patrol, and reverted a good faith edit as vandalism. That is what I am claiming will happen again in the future. I am human and I make mikstakes. If I were to say, "I will never accidently revert a good faith edit as vandalism again," as good as it would make me sound, I would be lying to myself and everybody else. If that makes me unfit to be an administrator, that I will have no problem withdrawing my RFA. To be honest, I am a little frustrated with it currently because it seems like a vote. So many, Supports per nom. I think those are people just perusing RFA's and going with the flow. I have much more respect for Oppose nominations (especially ones with a good explanation as to why, such as yours). You are an administrator that I have seen around alot, and have respect for. Do you personally reccomend that I withdraw my RFA, due to thisRC patrol mistake?. If you honsetly believe that it shows I am not worthy to be an administrator, I respect that opinion much more than the torrent of empty Supports. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

It is impossible to state "I will never accidentally do something again". How can you know? All you have to do is pledge to never use your rollback tool for anything other than vandalism reverts. The problem was not that you misused the java tool, and you accepted that it was a mistake. My issue is that you outright stated 'I'll probably make the same mistake again' - you should not. It is not a complex issue, and it's not a difficult judgement call to make. Don't use it for content disputes. Make sure an edit is vandalism before you use one of the tools to revert. The rule is in place as using a tool provides no edit summary, providing no clue as to why you reverted an edit. In the case of blatant vandalism, tere's no need, but if it's a good faith edit, it's now a content issue, so changes should be backed up by explanations. Misquoting George Santayana, "we must learn from our mistakes, or we are condemned to repeat them". Proto::► 14:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Vote change[edit]

I still feel that this RfA is occuring too quickly after the last attempt, but I am no longer opposing. I've switched to neutral, and I can't say I'll be sad when you're sysopped.--Scimitar ^parley 15:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Brian L. French[edit]

Another editor has listed an article that you have been involved in editing, Brian L. French, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian L. French. Please look there to see why this is, if you are interested in whether it should be deleted. Thank you. --Eastmain 17:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Coordinator Elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect seven coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 11!

Delivered by grafikbot 10:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the Barnstar, it's much appreciated. And you're right, I am letting them win, and I'm going to put it back up. Thanks for the encouragement. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 15:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

February[edit]

Congratulations[edit]

You're now an admin, shiny new tools and all. Use them as wisely as you can, and don't hesitate to ask questions. Re-read the policies as needed of course, and keep up the good work. Again, congrats. - Taxman ^Talk 00:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations[edit]

Hi Chris, I see you were just promoted to admin. Congratulations! If you ever need any advice or help, you're always welcome to ask. Well done, Gwernol 00:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your block of User:British sun[edit]

Thanks for that. Just wondering though- why only a week? Given it is a vandal only account isn't an indef block warranted? WJBscribe 00:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

No issue at all. And congrats by the way. Caution is def a good idea but I don't think there's much chance that a user who's only edits have been to put pictures of penises into random articles is going to reform into a valued contributor :-). WJBscribe 00:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations on your mop and bucket, Chris. You surely deserved them. :-) Have a good time with your new tools, use them wisely and keep up your great job on Wikipedia. Best regards, Húsönd 01:17, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations Chris, very well done. I hope to see you more often at DYK. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Username block template[edit]

I think you're looking for ((usernameblock)) Gwernol 02:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

210.0.142.78[edit]

Sorry about stepping on your block - leave as is, or is 48 too much? Kuru ^talk 03:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hurrah![edit]

Congratulations! Please don't block me. Sir. :) Bubba hotep 08:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hah yes I love it! type in Ernst Stavro Blofeld on google I am third highest on the results!!!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 12:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Use the Force Luke... | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 13:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Deletion of my post[edit]

I posted information on a non-profit program, Dynamic Youth Community, that helps kids with drug problems , you deleted it for being too much like an advert.. What can I do to make it more "appropriate"? This was not a ploy to make money, simply a means to give information to parents that may need help with there kid's drug problem. Please respond.... User:mikedycintake 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The agency is definately notable. The federal government did a study on the agency..the result was a manual that sets the standard for how adolescents should be treated. Additionally, there was a book published with 11 exceptional programs including DYC...can i copy a chapter from this book if i credit the book as the source? I will try to put something together noting these references...thanks for your help. I am a graduate of this program who was lucky enough that my parents stumbled upon it. Many of my friends died before they found help...I just want to get the info out there...

Congrats![edit]

I see you've been doing some good work around AIV (and cutting me off to blocks). Keep up the good work, and congrats on becoming an admin. alphachimp 17:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey I see you accepted adminship. Congratulations!! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I ahve been nominated already and proposed by many people who reckon I would be perfect for an admin but I declined -I would rather take things in my own stride rather than being tied down Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I know I have been seeing your name on the recent changes amending changes by d**kheads who think it cool to mess with the site and stupid childish new articles. I bow my bald head down to you for accepting -the site needs to be as protected and monitored as much as possible with it growing too. When you have time see the top of my user page -a slight improvemnt! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Article Deletion[edit]

You deleted the page "Windows Vista Service Pack 1". Although you didn't give a reason, I understand it was because of lack of references. I was going to cite them but before that you deleted the page. I'm relatively new here, so if there was anything else that I should do to make it more "appropriate", let me know. Sci13960 17:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Your Help Chris[edit]

I was in the process of adding a page for a couple of artists i couldnt find on here. When I started to add my first article for Joe Knockz it was deleted. If I want to contribute and add articles on subjects how do i do it? It just seems kind of hard to contribute around here...I'm very new. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Referencer101 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC).

• Replied on usres talk page

On the Lesbian vandal[edit]

Is there any way to find out who is creating these attacks? I'm wondering if it's somebody I reported awhile ago for vandalism or if it's somebody after me. Is there any way to track their IP address? Because if it's in an area near me I would like to know. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 18:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Reference to B-36 and P-51 edit wars[edit]

Akradecki, in reference to your comment--obviously you think your way is the only way, and anyone elses does not matter and does not count. With that attitude, I think it violates working out to an argreement. I already stated why I believe the P-51 photograph should be left. The context of the subject matter. Is the P-51 used in airshows? Sure, but when was it made and when did it see military action for what it was designed to do? Used a military fighting aircraft in the skies of World War II, not paraded as an antique relic of a goneby era. Obviously you tend to think this matter is a closed and done deal discussion. Since you decided to change the photograph with a disucssion or dialogue of the matter, and the excuse that the photograph that was previously on the page was of "poor" quality. Is a poor judgement and reason for changing it. So who is right? Obivously you think you are, and vice versa.

In reference to the B-36 photograph, I've already made comments on the dicusssion page. Just a FYI, the United States Air Force owns and operates that museum. The photograph I provided is of better quality and better representation of the aircraft in lieu of Rogerd's photograph which he provided.
1. The image is at an angle
2. There is a spectator of the musem in the image
3. The quality of the photograph is poorer than the one I supplied and
4. The photograph I provide shows much more of the aircraft versus what he supplied which mainly focuses on the fuslage and not the entire subject matter

Again, this beckons back to the original problem...who is right? It's stated in the Wiki Guidelines that Wikipedia is not a democracy. -Signaleer 18:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Kahle[edit]

Hi Cris, Yes, because I am useing my grandmothers computer. But how did you find out? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Kahle (talk • contribs)

Thanks for helping to un block me! Also I may change my password, my sister knows it, and has ben editing under my name!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Kahle (talk • contribs) 18:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I must have forgot. Kevin Kahle 18:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Where's bondpedia?[edit]

I was recently asked the question: Hey, i noticed bondpedia disappeared recently and i was wondering if you knew anything about it. Hopefully it will be back shortly. and I was wondering if you know because I cant access it either! --Highfields 18:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Kahle (again)[edit]

Kevin KahleKevin Kahle 18:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I must have forgot.Kevin Kahle 18:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)KevinKahle

I just did that by pressing shift+Kevin Kahle 19:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC). Kevin Kahle 19:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes now it workes! I must have mest it up making a new code! Kevin Kahle 19:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Hi Chris! I eas looking at your user page, and see you fly planes! Is it fun flying? I rode in one once there fun! But how do they realy work?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevin Kahle (talk • contribs) 19:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Kevin Kahle 19:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

I know flying is a lot of money, but what do you think about hang-gliding? Is it safe? Kevin Kahle 19:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

I am 14 (I will be 15 soon) is that to young to fly, and buy a hang-glider? Kevin Kahle 19:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Taking over unused account?[edit]

Is there a policy on wikipedia for this sort of thing? This account [2] hasn't been used at all, and I would like to have that nickname. Fireice 19:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!![edit]

Hi, Thank you very much, I was not knowing that. It was my mistake as I am new here. Thanks for your help. --Nirajrm ^{talk ||| sign plz!} 20:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Chris. How can you give a user a banstar? And how can you be awarded one? Kevin Kahle 20:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Reply to comments left on user page[edit]

Dont get me wrong, i respect your contributions as an editor! Im not trying to be an ass, just complety understand the situation! (your contributions really are appreciated, especially with my involvement in WP:AIRCRAFT, i have seen your work). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

First and foremost, in reference to the P-51 changes, the user BillCJ was the individual who made the first changes to the article without even discussing it.

Please see changes: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=P-51_Mustang&diff=103326453&oldid=103321047

Secondly, he was the first one to make assumptions and point the fingers at me without even having a chance to defense myself: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AP-51_Mustang&diff=103519676&oldid=103510194

If this kind of behavior is tolerated and within the Wiki Guidelines, then fine, I will let them have their charade on being reporting for my "vandalism" and "disruptive behavior" but the attacks by certain users on Wiki is absurd! The way in which you came across is also in a deragatory and unprofessional manner. -Signaleer 20:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

WOW! Chris! That is realy nice of you! THANKYOU. But I don't know the code. Kevin Kahle 20:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Congrats[edit]

Congrats on becoming a Sysop! Cheers! ~ Arjun 20:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou again Chris, Your great! Come see it Kevin Kahle 20:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Hey no prob, you most certainly deserve it, hopefully one of these days I can be helping you clear the backlogs. Cheers! ~ Arjun

		The Minor Barnstar
		IKevin Kahle 20:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle give you this banstar for your 14,000 edits on Wikipedia.

		The Minor Barnstar
		IKevin Kahle 20:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle give you this banstar for your 14,000 edits on Wikipedia.

Congratulations Chris! It's great to have another vandal-fighting admin. If you need any help with the admin tools, feel free to contact me. =) Nishkid64 20:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

68.117.46.48[edit]

Hello. I have no problem with you saying that there is not a long enough history to block here, but I'm surprised that you consider the messages posted to my talk page to be in good faith. If I am misinterpreting here, please explain or correct my frame of reference. Did you notice that another admin warned the IP in the past regarding personal attack to my talk page? Respectfully --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I looked through the edits of User:68.117.46.48 and particulary, this one I viewed as trying to make a valid addition to the article. While it may or may not have been, i sensed good faith here. Assuming that as good faith, your reversion here (also in good faith) appears as vandalism to the first edit because he felt he was making a valid addition. Possible offended or feeling that he valid contribution was removed he viewed you as a vandal (which you of course are not). Hope this helped! If you have any more questions, please let me know. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I appreciate you taking the time to explain. Note that I am not asking you to change your decision here. I would like to give you some additional background here, in case this situation is escalated further by the IP.

• The edit in question references 3 people in the text: Leroy DiMaggio and Joey McGloff, who both have 0 web hits, and Tony Lugosi, who has very few web hits to a freeweb article about a band it seems. This is clearly not a good faith edit after a bit of research.
• The edit [3] was first made by 146.57.10.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) who has only ever made 2 edits, both vandalism.
• The edit was reverted [4] by Cryptic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) 5 hours later.
• The vandalism was restored [5] by 68.117.46.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), with an edit summary of "rv vandal" 2 days later in that IP's 1st edit ever.
• The edit was reverted [6] by me 2 hours later.
• The vandalism was restored [7] by 68.117.46.48, with an edit summary of "grammar fix" 4 hours later in that IP's 2nd edit ever.
• The edit was reverted [8] by me 7 hours later. I also post a "test" on the IP's talk page.
• The vandalism was restored [9] by 216.41.144.41 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), with an edit summary of "get a life and stop trolling wikipedia, After Midnight" 22 minutes later in that IP's only edit ever.
• The edit was reverted [10] by me 20 minutes later.
• 68.117.46.48 uses its 3rd edit ever to post a false warning on my talk page[11]
• The vandalism was restored [12] by 68.117.46.48, with an edit summary of "rv" 30 minutes later in that IP's 4th edit ever.
• I request help on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive186#Joe DiMaggio.
• The edit was reverted [13] by Lucy-marie (talk · contribs) 15 minutes later.
• Lucy-marie requests page protection at the proper page.
• Protection is issued by Gnangarra (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
• Gnangarra warns the IP [14] and places a disregard message on my talk page.
• The IP redacts my test warning and removes Gnangarra's on their talk page[15] to make it appear as though I was commending them for their work!!! in that IP's 5th edit ever.
• I revert the redact with an edit history of "please don't change the intended meaning of our comments"
• 68.117.46.48 uses its 6th edit ever to post a 2nd false warning on my talk page [16].
• I request assistance at WP:AIV
• Ryulong (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) reverts vandalism on my talk page.
• You make determination that IP 68.117.46.48 is good faith, but you also post test4 on talk page
• I request explanation.
• You post reply to me.
• You retract your test 4 and replace it with a welcome banner.

Please consider this additional data, should you become involved again in this situation. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Got your reply and the Barnstar. Thanks for both. Like I said above, I understand that a block may not be constructive here and I have no desire for you to reverse course on that. My only concern was to show why I think that it is wrong to continue to WP:AGF with this user in the future. Best Regards. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 01:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Hey Chris, Put your banstar on your user page, it will look GREAT!

Chris, can you make your one banstar that anyone can use?

I mean could I make a banstar to give other users, like boat, firearm, or hand weapon banstar?Kevin Kahle 21:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Kevin Kahle

Chris, would you like to help me? I am trying to make a banstar for the user that tries to do the right thing. You can edit it on the sandbox you made me.Kevin Kahle 21:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Thanks...[edit]

for the com! Of course I am not uncomfortable. In fact just the opposite, thank you for your faith and trust in me. Cheers...now get back to those backlogs :). ~ Arjun 04:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi Chris, what is chaning the pictures? Could you help me with it? You have my permission to edit on my stuff.Kevin Kahle 04:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Kevin Kahle

DYK error[edit]

The Acts of Parliament in the UK are always refered to as the Such and Such Act, Date as there may be more than one with the same name. In this case it was the Lunacy (Vacating of Seats) Act 1886, not the Lunacy Act 1845. I won't put it back as it is obviously confusing. Yomangani^talk 14:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

of 1886 would have been fine. Those acquainted with the British legal system would know what it meant without the "of", but I don't suppose that is a large part of the audience. I don't think there is another Lunacy (Vacating of Seats) Act anyway, and we have no article for it, so no harm done. Cheers, Yomangani^talk 14:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

UK laws are very confusing and complicated. That's why we ignore them mostly. :) Bubba hotep 14:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

You do that over there too? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Usually helps things go a bit smoother, I find. Bubba hotep 14:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

User:AlexxxT[edit]

Your block didn't seem to work. He still managed some nasty vandalism on my userpage, among other things. ~ Flameviper ^{Who's a Peach?} 15:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, all right then. He was a real spazoid. Actually, he kind of reminded me of myself on a sugar high. ~ Flameviper ^{Who's a Peach?} 15:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Hi Chris, and thanks for the tip and the award! I have been trying to make sure that all the vandals that I report have all the required warnings and have vandalized past their final warning. Could you give me an example of some of the ones I've messed up? Thanks again! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 17:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I see what you mean by your first example; that IP's final warning had been a long time ago. As for the "one you just noticed," well, that IP had received so many warnings in the past, I figured it simply needed to be blocked. I reported it to AIV and warned it at the same time, so that's why my warning was after the report. It looks like Alphachimp has since blocked the address anyway. Sorry about my mistakes! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 17:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, Chris! By the way, I have interest in becoming an admin myself. I've been around since August last year, have over two thousand edits (sadly, my main space is rather shabby), and contribute most of my time to vandal fighting. I've also had an RfA before, but I was way too new. Do you think I'm admin material, and if so, when do you think I should run again (and how could I improve)? -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I had also figured that I would fail if I ran now. I'll stay involved in AfD discussions, and will try to improve my accuracy at AIV. When I have more main space contribs (which will probably be awhile), that's when I figured I would run. Thanks for the advice! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I'll keep that in mind :-) Thanks again! -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 18:16, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I Kevin Kahle 17:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle give you the Vandal Whacking Stick Award for whacking vandals.

Vandal Whacking Stick Award.

Personal attack User_talk:Cracker989[edit]

Regarding the Cracker989's personal attack. You acan find it here. Thanks. Jay†Litman 17:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The original warning[edit]

The original warning was inflamatory as it basically branded me an idiot by saying i did not know how to use wikipedia. That is why it was removed and I would not remove a warning i did not find inflamatory and thought was justified. This was given to me by a user who i was in an edit war with that cannot be a justified use of template warnings.--Lucy-marie 18:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes I am the middle of 7 I am also deaf aswell. I am proud of the first fact emmensly i value my family greatly.--Lucy-marie 18:34, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank I'm sure I'll cash that in.--Lucy-marie 18:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

The eldest in my family is 23 and the youngest is 8 and we are all from the same two parents.--Lucy-marie 19:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok you get back to your vandal blocking.It was nice talking im free to answer any more of your questions.--Lucy-marie 19:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Well done.--Lucy-marie 18:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV[edit]

I reverted your removal http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=105145955&oldid=105145906 , as the reality was the reverse, the user in question had been given a final warning before. _→AzaToth 18:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

reply copied from users talk page

Thank you for your concern. First off, here is my rationale for removal. here last warning is at 18:31. here last contrib is at 18:30 (still no edits since and user has not been blocked. at 18:34 i viewed that the vandal had not repeated and removed them from the list. This removal was not in err, however me choosing not to enforce a punitive block, which is against wikipedia blocking pilicy. Hope this helps! If you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to ask. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Block[edit]

I can see you're trying out your new buttons. ;-) Thanks for blocking User:85.146.24.65. | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 19:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. I hope you don't get mad at this extra "Orange Bar of Doom", but I had to say thank you. :-) Good luck with your administrative duties. | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 19:49, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Anytime... | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 19:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Range blocks[edit]

Chris, yes you can range block IPs, although I've never done it myself. The documentation is found at Wikipedia:Blocking_IP_addresses#Blocking_ranges which has links to the details. As that page warns, exercise caution when doing this - in particular it should probably be a "soft" block - i.e. make sure you enable account creation so that IP users can create accounts for themselves. Good luck, Gwernol 21:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocking[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for dealing with Goldendoggy on such short notice. I do believe, however, that the 24-hour block is not enough. Bobabobabo has created (and continues to create) many sockpuppets, and in the past, Ryulong has dealt with them with indefinite blocks. I think it would be best if this were done in this case as well, as to prevent more trouble from the Goldendoggy acount from occurring again. --Benten 01:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Block of 69.76.46.169[edit]

Hi, noticed you blocked this user. He'd put some stuff in my talk page that was bordering on illiteracy, it may have been a personal attack I wouldn't know, I think it's more likely a result of drunkeness. Anyway, seen as you seem to know what you're doing on this, can I blank his comments out of my talk page or do I need to leave them? The18thDoctor 17:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey Chris! I was wondering if I could put a web counter on my user page to tell how many people went on my page. Could you help me? Kevin Kahle 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Kevin Kahle

I want to get my article The Temptress as a top DYK feature could you help with referencing? It still needs a bit of info and some copy editing Ernst Stavro Blofeld 22:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you vote for me?[edit]

Hi I am a candidate for Wikipedia WikiProject Military history! I was wondering if you could vote for me! I will work hard in all that I do. Kevin Kahle 04:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Kevin Kahle

Blocking of anon IP, banned user[edit]

Hi. You blocked User:80.192.242.187 for disruptive edits. This is a sock of a persistent ban evader User:Irate. He has started editing again as the block has expired. I recommend a block of a week until his IP changes. This edit links him to the last confirmed sock account he used which was permanently blocked. Thanks. MRSC • Talk 12:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Its fattdoggy agin[edit]

It will look like im not blocked but im covering my I.P. adress. P.S. did u become a admin? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.163.209.187 (talk) 14:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

accutlay..[edit]

i dont think people would like it if i coverd my ip address —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.163.209.187 (talk) 14:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC).

Thankyou[edit]

...For blocking wrestlinglover420. He was getting seriously annoying, and it was all I could do to remain polite. SaliereTheFish 18:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Censoring RFK. Jr.[edit]

Thanks for taking care of that IP. I'm not clear as to why we have been targeted, I think it's that guy who kept trying to add his myspace page to the article. He called C-Span the other day and tried to direct traffic to his myspace by saying there was a link at RFK's wikipedia article. Maybe I romanticize the concept of a free online encyclopedia too much but in my opinion, trying to use the wiki to shill for your site is just plain wrong. Anyway, thanks again. Cheers. L0b0t 18:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your comments[edit]

Thanks for understanding that I was not engaged in vandalism. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 20:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the Barnstar...[edit]

Chris, I never tire of the kindness that you or the Wikipedian community has shown me :). Thank you very much.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 01:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Chris, I left a similar message on Joseph's talk page, but I wanted to thank you personally for the work you did with the Dominator page move issue. I originally was involved at the beginning of that mess, but I got called into work because our medivac helo broke, so I was up to my armpits in Bell 412 for a few hours. My abundant thanks to you, Joseph and the other project members who stepped in and did the brunt of the hard work with this issue. Akradecki 02:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

BTW, I forgot to mention earlier, I see from your userboxen that you're in Virginia. If you ever decide to fly a really long cross country for your private, and end up at the Mojave Spaceport, you have an open invitation for a personal ramp tour. And as much fun as you're having flying fixed-wing, if you ever get a taste of rotary wing, you'll be spoiled for life! Akradecki 23:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Might me a challenge after i get my private all the way to build my hours up for a commercial. I will keep that in mind, Thanks for the offer! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

DYK[edit]

On February 5, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Albert Mooney, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hello Chris and thanks again for your contributions. You should give yourself a shot on the updating rounds sometime. Enjoy! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:16, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Just dropping you a line[edit]

I went ahead and removed Loser555; I really have no idea why Wikipedia27 would have reported him in the first place. We've been getting a lot of silly requests lately... EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! That is what I thought but I wanted to check. I agree there have been alot of silly requests latley. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Cheers chris for the barnstar, I'm not sure if i deserve it though! I wasn't at all trying to bite the user at WP:RFCN, I even gave him a welcome message before asking him about his username, it was just meant to be advice, not simply telling him to change his username. But I guess it didn't go too well and did seam like I was trying to force him to change his name. Might just drop the suggestions for a while and stick to commenting on usernames, cheers again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism from 165.248.247.133[edit]

I reported him because he was warned on 02/02/07 [17], and made one vandal edit today. Fireice 18:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV[edit]

I know how AIV works. Did you even look at his contribs and talk page? He's done nothing but vandalism, which he obviously knows is wrong. There's no point putting a up a warning. Also, the comment on his talk page about him improving the Cotton Gin article is incorrect, that was actually another IP user, this user replaced Eli Whitney with Ron Jeremy. He's been banned before and got a warning in the recent past. He knows it's wrong, he enjoys attention. -- feb^talk 18:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. You'll notice, however, that after you warned him, he was blocked before he had a chance to vandalize more (four minutes between his vandalism of Zachary Taylor and Martin Van Buren). I am aware of dynamic and shared IPs, however the vandalism in the contribs is very consistant, and grounds for banning even if it were multiple people. Anyone who wants to legitimately edit wikipedia can always sign up for an account through another connection -- feb^talk 19:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

In the case of User:64.8.175.129 he has already recieved a Fourth level warning. LukeSurl 20:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

I appreciate your advice on warning vandals, I will definitely do that in the future in such cases. All the best! Eatabullet 19:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

RE[edit]

Thanks for the star! I was just looking out for the good of the old wiki-users. Cheers, —mikedk9109^SIGN 19:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My RfA[edit]

Hey Chris,

I just would like to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a final tally of 54/13/11. I appreciate the trust expressed by members of the community, and will do my best to uphold it.

Naturally, I am still becoming accustomed to using the new tools, so if you have suggestions or feedback, please let me know. - Gilliam 20:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Will do, thanks. - Gilliam 20:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Help Request[edit]

Hi Chris. This is not aviation-related, but I am having a problem with some IP users on the Atlanta Braves page. They keep making changes (described at Talk:Atlanta Braves), but will not engage in discussion at all. THe last user, User:146.74.1.99, has made the last two changes (today and Jan 31), and has a history of vandalism on his contributions page (including self-described page blankings).

I have asked for discussion in every revert of these chenges,a nd opened a discussion on the talk pge, but so far no one has even responded. Because of the multiple IPs used, I havent tried to contact the users directly on the matter, but I have left 2 warnings on the last IP user's page.

I have considered asking for help on the Baseball Project page, but even if this is a difference of interpretation, the users are using disruptive tactics, so I did not feel this would really help. If you cannot help directly, could you point me towards someone who could? Thanks for your time, and your contributions to WP:AIR. - BillCJ 20:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

THanks much!!! - BillCJ 21:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

NP. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandal reporting[edit]

Hi, thanks for your recent comment. Could you tell me what length of time would be considered appropriate between final warning & reporting, for ip vandals? Thanks. - Belovedfreak 20:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that clarification. Certainly don't want to make your job any harder. - Belovedfreak 20:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Gosh... thanks... my first barnstar! Thanks to you also... keep up the good work! - Belovedfreak 21:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

User 216.109.5.50[edit]

User 216.109.5.50 has been banned 3 times in 3 weeks.

6 days ago he/she had the following warning:

"Regarding edits made during 2007-01-29 (UTC) to French Revolution Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia."

Sure, he/she was subsequently blocked for further vandalism, but within 1 day after coming back, he/she then vandalised Rocket again.

But that warning still stands, so the user has been recently warned, the fact that he was blocked afterwards is not in the wikipedian rules as a disqualifying condition. It's not like the user can go 'I never knew it was against the rules to vandalise!' Exactly where does it say there has to be at least one warning per block? The user has been recently warned.WolfKeeper 21:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

((UsernameConcern))[edit]

It's working. Try it out! So much of the phrasing is a matter of personal style that I encourage people to paraphrase it their own way if they prefer, or even write their own text as if this didn't exist -- but for those of us too harried and/or tired to type long notes or find diplomatic words, it may be helpful. Ben 23:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Sucking up[edit]

You can suck all you want to the Airplane wikiproject guyz, but I am suggesting correct wiki-policy, read and learn something, we know Administrators work for nothing; and you get what you pay for in life...bye!

• +Maincat is Category:Unmanned vehicles
• +Subcat is Category:UAVs and drones
• +Sub-subcat is Category:MALE UAVs

I think that the only +cat this article should be in is the +Sub-subcat Category:MALE UAVs, that is why we have have a +cat hierarchy see Wikipedia:Categorization. Headphonos 01:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

New Flag system available[edit]

Would you be interested in some templates that I developed for the "Where I have been" section of your user page? Check out ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/GetCountryFlag)) and ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/GetProvinceFlag)) for just flags. For nation and/or province names, use ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/GetCountryName)) and ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/GetProvinceName)).

Or you can use the most capable version that I use. It's ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/Nation Flag Entry)) and ((User:Will Pittenger/templates/Province Flag Entry)). Enjoy them. I created them for myself, but knew, and somewhat hoped for, that they would be used in user boxes and other users' pages. Will (Talk - contribs) 01:55, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

SexPanther Radio[edit]

Would you be willing to look over my article on SexPanther Radio? I just want to make sure that everything is ok with the references and stuff. One admin LongHair has already placed the reference tag on it, but I would like someone with knowledge of the school and area to look it over. If you're too busy with other things I understand. -- Stingray23464(Talk)

Question about not blocking 195.194.144.2[edit]

Chrislk02, thanks for your comment on my talk page clarifying the policy on blocking IP addresses. I appreciate that it's quite likely that the vandals using 195.194.144.2 are different people at different times. That said, quite a lot of vandalism comes from that IP. For example, of the 18 contributions from 1st February to now, I count two that aren't vandalism / rubbish. Would a block on anonymous contributions not be appropriate in this situation? Epimorph 15:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar, and especially thanks for your advice Epimorph 23:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks (Barnstar)[edit]

Thank you very much for the barnstar. I almost don't know what to say, its my very first one. Reporting vandals is just part of the job I guess. Mr.Z-mantalk 16:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The block of 164.68.120.3[edit]

don't you think 9999 hours is a bit too much for an anon block? _→AzaToth 17:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• for my references 164.68.120.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

It's a sharedipedu, so I would recommend the standard 6 month block. _→AzaToth 17:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

I moved it to 3000 hours (bout half a year) and softened it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks again[edit]

Thanks Chris for that advice. It can be a bit confusing with all the different warnings etc, but I think I'm getting the hang of it! - Belovedfreak 18:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Metrocard revert[edit]

I'm not entirely sure why you reverted the last Metrocard change - regarding the Paypass trial. While I can't readily find the May 31st date, I was just visiting Mastercard's site for it yesterday, and see the date has been extended to March 31st.

Ref: http://www.mastercard.com/us/paypass/subway/faresoverview/autopayplan.html

(I don't want to immediately revert a revert, and would like to double-check the facts...but you're welcome to change it first.) John Silvestri 19:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Fixed it! Thanks, my mistake. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

X42bn6 (talk · contribs)[edit]

Could you take a look at this username for me before I even bother approaching them about it? The only contributions they have made is to X42bn6 which is a magazine, it seams like spam to me. Cheers RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Hold on, forget that!! I've made a mistake and got users mixed up! RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 21:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Astroturf[edit]

Thanks for your NPOV edits on the FieldTurf article. I'm almost certain that Coz will make some reverts to the changes you have made, so if you could continue making neutral changes and monitor the article for rv's and additions from Coz I'd appreciate it. Ben 22:03, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Atlanta Braves[edit]

User:146.74.1.99 is back again; warning issued. - BillCJ 22:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Done -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

F..P...G...[edit]

Thanks for that - he's a friend - and seeing that on waking up here in Perth, W.A. an hour or so ago was a suprise - so at least when he turns on it wont have the same impact if there has been a block - but I am a bit horrified by the firnedly-ness of the text with that block message! cheers SatuSuro 23:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC) ???? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

My apologies -the blocked User: Fascist Pig Gnangarra - clearly is focused on attacking User:Gnangarra an admin here - and it is the admin who I know - I am sorry for confusing you SatuSuro 23:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh, no problem. Was just a little confused there. Yea, i recognized the name as an admin and thought that might be worth an indef block! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that SatuSuro 02:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your message[edit]

Why are you telling me this? When people are bullying me and harassing me (and worse, being patronizing!) and accusing me of all sorts of crap for no good reason don't I have a reason to be angry? It may not help my case, but already they condemned me (and without my knowledge, when I logged in the other day and saw the message and the discussion, I was not only flabbergasted, but incredulous at the length of discussion!) and I am still incredulous. People need to wake up and smell the coffee and realize that the world does not revolve around them and their personal views and it does not give them the right to say things about me that are not true. Malakaville 13:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Really, somebody said that?? There are so many negative comments there I got dizzy wading through that thing. Anyway thanks for your advice. I have aspergers syndrome and sometimes lose my cool when I write comments. Malakaville 14:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the compliment Chris! I am a little confused when you said I should subst my warnings. I thought that's what I have been doing. MetsFan76 15:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

• No problem! I will try to be more aware of it in the future. And thanks for the barnstar!! I'm going to slide it over to my user page so the only other one I have doesn't feel lonely!! =) MetsFan76 15:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR page[edit]

I want to sort out the issue at first with the other user/violator. At now he's also doing the same. Wiki-newbie 17:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Response copied from Wiki-newbie's user talk page The other editor replaced the request after you removed it. This does not show that they are "trying to work it out". I have also posted a notice about this at WP:ANI. If it gets worked out, then a link to the discourse between you and this other editor would help clear this up. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Sin Sizzerb Rapper article[edit]

You recently deleted an article in which there was an on-going debate going on about whether it should be kept or not and with an admin saying it matches the wikipedia requirements: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sin_%28rapper%29 Can you please un-delete because its not fair that myself and others have put work into making it following wikipedia guidelines and you deleted it for no reason —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistabusta (talk • contribs)

vandal-only account?[edit]

Hi Chris, because Washington D.C. is on my watchlist, I came across some vandalism, and tracked it back to this user's history. Besides created an absurd article about himself in the namespace (which I tagged with a CSD lable), he also vandalized the D.C. article and an article about an actress. As far as I can see, no legit edits. Thought I'd pass this on to an admin. Akradecki 01:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Done - blocked for spaming and self promotion. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Stalking[edit]

Is against the rules at Wikipedia, he is tracking me through my edits and changing my edits on articles he has never written on. That is wiki-stalking and he could have his account blocked for it...your an administrator start acting neutral! Headphonos 02:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Sweet, now you're both stalking me...like I said before, your a suck-up and your opinion is meaningless..bye ! Headphonos 02:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Diff I have contributed this article, do you see your buddies edits anywhere in the article history? That is called stalking bye ! Headphonos 02:13, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I am advising you to no longer post B.S. or anything else on my talk page, I have nothing further to discuss with you, you are biased and therefore, useless at wikipedia....bye! Headphonos 02:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Need help with a vandal[edit]

Hi Chris, can you join this thread and share any thoughts? There are additional details at User talk:144.138.25.81. Looks like an interesting pattern. Thanks! Akradecki 03:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Done -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Maurice Benayoun[edit]

Oops! The page in question contains a free license at the bottom releasing the text. I forgot to chefck the talk page which indicated this. My apologies! Could you restore the page? BuddingJournalist 13:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Done -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Oops[edit]

You redeleted the article Xxxchurch under G4. However, you failed to notice that the prior AFDs had just been overturned at deletion review. See the deletion log [18] or the deletion review Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 2. GRBerry 14:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Undeleted. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Xxxchurch[edit]

Could you post a link to the deletion review so this sort of mistake won't happen again? It should have been posted in the article's talk page when it was recreated. Rklawton 14:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I was not the originial re-creator. In the future, if i accidently delete deletion review stuff, i will. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Trialsanderrors was the original admin who undeleted the article pst deletion review. The edit summary of the undelete contains the link to the deletion review. I also, for your conveneience, noted it on the articles talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I thought I read through the history, so I must have missed it. Rklawton 14:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

NP. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD/Old[edit]

Thanks for taking the time to help out at closing AfDs! I know you have just received your shiny mop, so it's understandable you may have missed out on a few minor stuff :

• Talkpage of articles should be deleted along with the article, should the AfD result be a delete.
• Remove '((REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD))' within an AfD when closing one.

For the full list of procedures, check out Deletion guidelines for administrators. Happy editing! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 15:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Sorry bout that. I will cleanup my mess. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Should be all cleaned up. Thanks for pointing that out. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Mapkid13[edit]

Could you look into User:Mapkid13 for me? As a non admin, I don't think its my place to be bold and blank his userpage. In my opinion its offensive and has a personal attack on. Cheers RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Cheers, have a good hol RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 00:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Re. Picking editors for RFA[edit]

Hehe, thanks. :-) Keep up the good work as well, I hope you're finding it easier with your new tools. Best regards, Húsönd 00:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks Chris, I hope you will have a good wikibreak, we will miss you! ~ Arjun 00:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Nice, wikibreak, Chris? Notice your user page extremeties were not violated once in your absence. Is that good or not? ;) Bubba hotep 14:50, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I am beginning to realize, the more articles I delete, the more people that get pissed off at me! I guess taking a break from that saved me for a few days. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

SanDisk Sansa[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of SanDisk Sansa. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Alethiareg 04:34, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I have fixed it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 05:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

My RFA[edit]

Thank You, Chrislk02/archive03 for your Support! Thank you for your support in my RfA, which closed at 111 / 1 / 2. I am humbled and rather shocked to see such kind comments and for it to reach WP:100. Please feel free to leave a note if I have made a mistake or if you need anything, I will start out slow and tackle the harder work once I get accustomed to the tools. Thank you once more, I simply cannot express in words my gratitude.

...fly on littlewing. ~ Arjun 19:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Tupolev Tu-134[edit]

Hi! I'm Dutch. I have left you a message in the page that you have disposed to practise the traslation. Check it.

Closing deletion debates[edit]

Hey. When closing Afds, make sure you take care of any fair use images that are orphaned as a result of deleting an article. --- RockMFR 23:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

don't delete the images of cult movies if they in wikicommons, because i want to use them in http://uncyclopedia.org/ (a wiki for fun/funny content) which is also a wikimeadia project. Jtgerman 11 Feb. 2007

Articles for deletion/List of cult films[edit]

both the List of cult films and the List of films considered the worst ever were great lists! I am so sad you deleted them, is there any way anyone can get the list back and put it into http://uncyclopedia.org/ ? (it is a wiki for fun/funny content) which is also a wikimeadia project. Same request applies to the List of animes which was also recently deleted Jtgerman 11 Feb. 2007

CBDunkerson[edit]

User talk:CBDunkerson#Atlanta Braves

This admin is interfering with my attempts to clean up the vandal's activity on the Atlanta Brave page. Can you help? Thanks. - BillCJ 17:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

He may be correct. I will review further though. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you show me some diffs that are vandalism? Until I see anything clearley otherwise I have to agree with what Admin User:CBDunkerson has stated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I use disruptive edits and vandalism interchangeably. To me they are the same thing, and are not in good faith. If there is a better term that fits here, please tell me, but it's not a mere content dispute. I have attemped to cover both views of the issue in dispute, but the IP user still removes them. He won't discuss it at all, what else can I do but treat this as vadalism? This user has used at least 5 separate IP addresses, so it's impossible to actually try to talk with him. I have tried to discuss things on the article talk page, but he refuses to communicat, or even accept compromises. And now CBD is insulting me by acting like I am engaging in a mere revert war, as if I haven't tried to communicate at all! I have, and the disruptive edits have continued. What else can we do here short of semi-protecting the page?

To be honest, I don't know how much longer I will continue to edit on Wikipedia if things do not change. As long as unregistered users are allowed to edit, this garbage will continue. It is getting to the point where it's not worth the trouble. THe WP:AIR project is pretty good, but I am fed up with editing non-aviation articles. CBD has accused me of not accepting compromise, but how how can you when all your attempts to compromise are still reverted? - BillCJ 18:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I feel ya, it can be frustrating. That is one of the major controveries on wikipedia is whether anons can edit. However, there is a fine line between good faith but bad content edits and blatant vandalism. I myself am guilty of calling some good faith edits (they hmay have been in bad taste but nontheless good faith) edits vandalism. When i started here, my edits may have been seen as vandalism because I did not know any better. That is why so much care is often taking in protecting anons vs named editors. An anon can convert to a named editor that may become a major contributor. The trick is, learning how to appeal to new editors and get them involved in a friendly manner. Hope this has helped some! Hope you dont leave wikipedia, I enjoy seeing you around WP:AIRCRAFT. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I know its a big issue about IP editors. Is there a central page for discussing this issue? I would certainly like to get involved in the discussion of the issue. As to the article in question, I really beleive this is someone acting in bad faith, though I have no concrete proof of it. I am basing this on the style of edits, and the fact that he changes all attempts to compromise, and won't communicate. Maybe I'm wrong to to believe that his edits are in bad faith, but I have seen newbie edits before (including my own), and this isn't the same thing.- BillCJ 18:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: Lockdown[edit]

Thanks for telling me. I had a feeling it was something like that. RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 17:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD to close[edit]

Fyi Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gomerian. Yours helpfully (!), --Dweller 17:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry bout that. Done -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: John van geen[edit]

Good day. Could you provide reliable references which confirm the accuracy of the content in the article on John van geen? The query I issued provided less than two dozen hits. --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 17:42, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

for the year 1966. He is a real, notable person. I forgot to add my maintenace tags when removing the speedy notice. I have now added an ((accuracy)) and ((Expand)) maintenance template to the article. Hope this helps. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I actually went back and created the article more appropriatley based on that link. If you look at the hidden comments (added by the creating editor), it gave the location they got the information from and explained it was there first article. There was no reason that article should have been speedily deleted so I stand by my original decision of removing the speedy tag. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Response To Press Concerns.[edit]

Should I have done it there as well? I am very sorry. I went to Jimbo Wales thinking that he would have the most experience with this. Was I wrong? I wasn't expecting an instant reply at all. Acalamari 18:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I've told the user to stop contacting other users for the moment. I'll copy and paste my message to Mr. Wales from his talk page onto the noticeboard. I'll also inform Mr. Wales about the noticeboard posting. Acalamari 18:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

• Done. Acalamari 18:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

What's up[edit]

How was you wikibreak? Cheers! ~ Arjun 18:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Refreshing! How are the tools? I have ran into you a few times today at WP:AIV. Have you tried out any other areas yet?-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Great to hear; yes I have become active at the WP:RFPP and obviously the WP:AIV and CSD. But I am also branching out to Category:Requests for unblock. ~ Arjun 18:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The other day i stepped my foot into the minefield of closing WP:AFD's. That was a bit crazy. Nobody is going to be happy in most cases no matter what you do, lol. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

That is the truth; My talk page has been edited so much since being an admin. Mostly due to the "Why was my article deleted" question; or what I like to call the question^tm. ~ Arjun 18:29, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Lol; do you realize your talk page is listed in teh "requests for unblock" cat. ~ Arjun 18:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

←I have gotten more questions about, "why dident you block the anon i posted. they vandalized once today and had a warning a year ago. Why werent they blocked?" I got so tired of that one and the reporting of vandals that had not editing in the pat 6 hours that i created custom templates to let posters know. User:Chrislk02/notwarned and User:Chrislk02/notrecent. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

It was listed there because you linked to the category without the leading colon. I added the colon to your above statement. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Oops; thanks for that, my mistake. ~ Arjun 18:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for reverting my page :-) Myanw 18:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

NP. I also blocked the vandal. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Gomerian AFD[edit]

I agree the article needs to be deleted, but it might be worth pointing out that the alleged copyvio was actually a copy and paste job on the livejournal blog from the Wikipedia article.--Jsorens 18:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I will look into that. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:38, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for bringing that to my attention. While you feel that the article may need to be deleted, that is not for me to decide. I reviewd what you told me and I did, in a msitake, speedy delete the article and by extension prematurley closed the afd. I have un-deleted the article and re-opened the afd to allow it to run course in accordance with wikipedia deletion policies. Thanks again! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for checking it out! --Jsorens 21:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

NP. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Ryanpostlethwaite[edit]

Cheers chris for reverting my talkpage, think its one more strike and he's out........ RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 18:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hes already out for good. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

e=mc death[edit]

yeh that time it wasnt me, i just did it once cos i didnt know what it was i thought it wss there by accident.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Propagandhi12345 (talk • contribs)

Re. speedy deletion[edit]

Hello Chris. Thanks for telling me about this admin hang-on template. I've never seen anything of the kind. Although I think that it might be a good idea, I can't think of a workable solution for such template. Any user, especially the creator of an SD candidate, could place the admin hang-on template thereby tricking admins and hindering the whole deletion process. But well, maybe your thread will produce good ideas. :-) Regards, Húsönd 00:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Help Needed[edit]

Not sure if this is right, but I need help.. you recently deleted a page about a student named Brandon Breedwell. I need the page to remain up. Please check the talk page of it for more information. Thanks. AquaStreak 01:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry but you failing a class does not meet wikipedias notability criteria. You will need a much better argument based on wikipedia policy for the article to be re-instated. However, if you feel that this deletion was improperly done you are welcome to submit it for Deletion Review. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Kitty Cottage wikipedia page[edit]

Hello-

I created a wikipedia site a few weeks ago for a local cat shelter called the Kitty Cottage in Blue Bell, PA. Could you please help me understand why this site was deleted? I felt that I did a good job of linking to other wikipedia pages and giving full information. Other local pet shelters from around the U.S. have their own wikipedia pages, so I don't understand why another such page would not be acceptable.

Lunarcleo 03:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)Lunarcleo

The article was written like an advertisement. It also did not assert why your cat shelter was more notable than the cat shelter down the road. There were also very few, if any third party reliable sources citing the article as well as you may have a Conflict of interest in the creation of this article. These are all very important when writing an article for wikipedia. If you feel that the article can be written in a manner that does not read like an advertisement with reilable third party sources asserting why this shelter is notable and have it written from a Neutral point of view, it would possible not get deleted. If you need help with this, please let me know. Thanks -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 03:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Unblock[edit]

Dear Chris. You have recently blocked URL 218.189.215.179 from editing as you regard it as a Spambot. This is the URL of a secondary school in Hong Kong where I have been encouraging my students to use wikipedia and wikibooks for collaborative learning. Please, please, please unblock us!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidjohncock (talk • contribs)

The ip adderss specified was mass adding of links to sites for viagra and other medication. These actions were the definition of spam. The block was temporary and should expire soon. However, if the spam continues it will more than likley get blocked for a much longer period of time. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Might I also reccomend having your students sign up for accounts to avoid blocks of IP address. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks - I'm concerned to hear that spammers are infiltrating our URL and I'll let the school's IT technician know about it. Meanwhile, students will have to sign up at home before joining the wikibooks as wikipedia limits sign ups from the same URL to six per day. {Davidjohncock}

Blocking SharedIPEDUs[edit]

Please use ((schoolblock)) as your reason for blocking in these cases. It reduces the load of emails we get from confused teachers and students on the unblock-en-l mailing list. And don't hesitate to hand out 6 month blocks for primary and secondary schools. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  15:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

The blocking of User:Hotflick[edit]

Hi Chris! Firstly, thank you for your speedy response to my report. I would appreciate some advice here. I've only been around a few weeks, and I've not progressed beyond vandalism reversion and typo correction. Was WP:AIV the correct place to report this? I thought about reporting it as a conflict of interest, but the guy seemed to be on a roll. Oh, and should his edits (if there are any left) be reverted? Philip Trueman 17:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

A, i already reverted them. B, that was probably on ok palce to report them, they were on a roll. There are a couple of things that should have been done though. They should have ben warned with one of the series of spam templates ((spam1)), ((spam2)), ((spam3)) or ((spam4)) (which i did warn them with and they did not stop). Also, there username could violate WP:USERNAME which could be reported to WP:RFCN. I also posted a message about it at the administrators notice board WP:ANI to see what other admin think. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep that block log growing![edit]

		The Merciless Swooping Hawk Award
		I award you this hawk for your ruthlessness in blocking hordes of noxious vandals. Keep up the great work! Regards, Húsönd 17:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Moubray[edit]

I am sorry that I posted this user at ani with out final warning.I removed the submission and went to add final warning to his/her talk page but you had block him/her already.once again sorry for the mistake.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  19:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

no problem. I looked through his edits and being he was a named vandal, the rules are a little less stringent than anon reports. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Congradulations!!![edit]

You are now recognized as a recipient of the Big Boss Award. Thank you for undoing the vandalism on my userpage. This is my way of showing thanks to dedicated wikipedians.

Big Boss 0

How long[edit]

...of a block do you think; personal attacks, vandalism, posting of private info. ~ Arjun 20:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Named or anon? named indef. anon 6 months soft. (but then again, that kind of stuff realy pushes my buttons) -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Anon. ~ Arjun 20:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for blocking the vandal who was editing my user page — I didn't even notice it until after you had taken care of him! Again, thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

NP, thanks persian poet gal! She reported it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Changing Titles[edit]

Is it possible to change the title on an article? I've looked around the "Help" section, but I can't seem to find it. If you could help me out, or point me to the article I should read, that would be nice. Stingray23464 (talk)

WikiProject Military History elections[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by February 25!

Delivered by grafikbot 13:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

68.160.165.46[edit]

This user has done this before under the IP addresses of 141.154.10.193 and 68.162.243.40 and the last edit was only 20mins ago. This will continue on all day long today. - SVRTVDude ^{(Yell - Toil)} 14:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Poorly referenced articles[edit]

Hello,

The poverty article included some awful references (blockquote inside a reference?) that I have since cleaned up. However I also notice that many "references" are simply links to other wiki pages. I know this is not correct, but I don't see a good template message to use for this situation in the Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup article. Ideas? /ClintonKu 15:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Leave a note on the talk page regarding it. Remove the refs to other wikipedia articles (make sure to reference this in the edit summary or it may accidently getreverted). Finally, being the article will no longer have references (And did not have proper references) add the ((Unreferenced)) tag to the top! Hope this help. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, but I don't really want to edit the page myself, because it needs so much work. I just wanted to let other users know about the bad links. I'll update its talk page too. Thanks again. /ClintonKu 15:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Pot calling the kettle black at ANI[edit]

You may be interested in this. One of the supporting links I reference in my post there relates to you and links to your talk archive. Keesiewonder ^talk 16:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I am confused as to what you are requesting at WP:ANI. If the user has recently violated a wikipedia policy, feel free to let me know and directly show me the diffs. (I have a slower computer and WP:ANI tends to crash my browser occasionally). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to be cryptic. Headphonos started an ANI about Ensyc after a failed AIV he posted against Ensyc. My sense is that rather than Ensyc being the vandal, Headphonos is the subtle vandal for the various reasons/links I listed at the ANI. So, my putting info in Headphonos' ANI post is like a reverse-ANI. The simple approach for admins noticing this ANI thread may be to close the ANI with whatever the appropriate response is regarding Ensyc. A more complicated approach may be to look at Headphonos' history (both what I have posted and what you may know from your own experience in other arenas such as aviation related topics) and issue some response to Headphonos. The edits and diffs I post in the ANI should give you what you need from my perspective. I could post them again here if that would be easier on your computer. I posted to your talk since I link to your talk page in my ANI material. Plus, another interested party suggested I feel welcome giving you a heads-up like I gave them. Let me know if I'm still not making sense. Keesiewonder ^talk 17:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh no, it make sense. I understand now, i was just a little confused before. I dont know, I agree he can be disruptive and, in the future if you give me examples of his disruption I will be glad to warn/block him if appropriate. Some of his edits are good faith and valuable edits and others seems like he may still have a bad case of WP:OWN and an inability to remain WP:CIVIL. Until I see concrete recent examples of such actions, I cant do a whole lot. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

How do you feel about repetitive removal of well placed tags by other editors, without any change to the article? That is probably the most frequent, blatant, breach of policy IMO. If your definition of "recent" includes edits in the last 24 hours, there are several tag removals in his user contribution history. Keesiewonder ^talk 17:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I will re-peruse for this. I did run into this user doing it before, removing the tags when the issues had not been resolved. I had forgotten about this abuse. I will take another look at User:Headphonos. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

i.e. this "policy" from Wikipedia-Types of Vandalism focusing on sentences two and three ...

Improper use of dispute tags

Dispute tags are an important way for people to show that there are problems with the article. Do not remove them unless you are sure that all stated reasons for the dispute are settled. As a general rule, do not remove other people's dispute tags twice during a 24 hour period. Do not place dispute tags improperly, as in when there is no dispute, and the reason for placing the dispute tag is because a suggested edit has failed to meet consensus. Instead, follow WP:CON and accept that some edits will not meet consensus. Please note that placing or removal of dispute tags does not count as simple vandalism, and therefore the reverting of such edits is not exempt from the three-revert rule. Keesiewonder ^talk 17:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Will post some diffs here to help you ... please note that I'm listing each article in which I've seen this once, but it has happened many times per article. You can see this from the individual article's history. talk page attempt by others; another talk page attempt; the diffs: [19]; [20]; [21]; [22]; [23]; Keesiewonder ^talk 17:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

My Review[edit]

Here is what I see. In regards to the article on Bully Kutta. There are 2 links provided which are disputed as references. The one] is an pretty godo source i would trust. the other has no content and should not be listed as a reference. This oculd go either way based on the reference provided. I would tend to accept them and not challenge the valditiy of the references however. However, there is one section that appears to be originial research without the information in the article corresponding to the source. I tagged that with a ((Unreferenced)) tag. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your perspective. Personally, I would not call www.molosserdogs.com a good, trustworthy source. As best I can tell, it is a special interest forum seeking funds to keep itself up and running. Anyone can set up a site like this and there are thousands on the internet. IMO, user forums are not reliable references - and in most cases where this site is used, it is the only reference, which makes it particularly suspicious. The test for me is that the content presented for the obscure, rare breeds highlighted above is that it is not found anywhere else. But ... if you consider this particular site a good resource, you've done your due diligence on this for the day. Thank you! We can politely disagree. :-)--Keesiewonder ^talk 17:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I respect your opinion, and honestly, I am still reseraching the issue. I took a prelim look, and preliminarily it appears as though it may house some valid information. Is it the best source available, i will agree it is not. However, i do believe that the dog may be encylopedic. I am still looking around for some other sources, see what information is out there. (i dont know alot about dogs, actually my girlfriend and i are kind of at odds over the dog thing because I am a cat person myself). Im still looking into it though, and trying to expand the article. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Of interesting note (and not sure how this affects the issue at hand), the Molosser is an article on the group of dogs

. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, that is true. But, do you see any real, reliable, third-party, unbiased reference material listed on that page? Like a book with an ISBN or an article from a scholarly journal or even an article from the popular trade press? I don't. But, it's Valentine's Day! I don't want to hear about any dog vs. cat arguments between you and your lady friend over this! Hope you have a great day! :-) Keesiewonder ^talk 17:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for being so WP:CIVIL, you are a model wikipedian. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Just to let you know. I changed my mind about that source after researching the website. If you look at the talk page of the disputed article, I gave some reasoning behind it. Thanks again for being so civil. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• You're most welcome; life's too short to not try to be kind ... Thanks for your efforts on this topic as well; it is complicated and controversial. Thanks also for noticing me with a barnstar; not quite necessary ... but appreciated just the same! Keesiewonder ^talk 18:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• But, it was necessary. Not to be insulting but i deal with ,any idiots all day who think that bullying, threatning, leaving nasty message will get people to agree with them. You, take the time to deal nicley with it, and when we disagreed, were probably one of the most civil wikipedias I have seen. This most definitley deserved a barnstar!-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:29, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Sensitive IPs[edit]

I implemented your suggestion[24], it is a most useful feature. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 17:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please block me[edit]

note - I gave it this section title Hello. The Ip address that I am sending you this message from, is a school network. Blocking such places is wise.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.45.204.100 (talk • contribs)

User talk:209.7.119.155[edit]

Hi. I notice you have given the above a series of final warnings. He should be barred already then - check out the (minor) one you may have missed at Subliminal message. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 18:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing that to my attention. However, they have not vandalized since I gave them a final warning. Blocking is not to be punitive however a defense against on going vandalism. Should they vandalize again today, please report them to WP:AIV where they will most likley be blocked because of the final warning. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Will do. Please note that I am as committed to protecting User Gwernol as any other concerned editor, and that is my sole intention in this matter. Cheers. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 18:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Trust me! I am on the same page as you. If it was a named editor I would have prob indef blocked them (as I do to many named editors who vandalise Gwernol). I watch his page and jump on vandals! Thanks again for your hard work, it is much appreciated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Advice[edit]

Hi. Perhaps you can give me guidance on this. At West Highland White Terrier, I am currently trying to protect the article in its consensually applied state, however I have an anonymous IP user who is making sweeping edits (removals not additions), and will not enter into discussion at the article talk page, nor leave an edit summary explaining why he/she has done this?

I know that there is a "three reverts and out" rule in Wikipedia, and I am afraid I will be reaching this point unless I call it vandalism. I actually don't think it is, but I cannot get a response of any kind from the person.

Any tips would be appreciated. Thanks Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 19:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I will look into it. give me 5 mins or so! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I warned them. If they remove it again without explanation, I will consider it vandalism after a warning and temporarily block them. Hope this helps. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Different IP 71.104.226.219 has now repeated the same three edits - I am inclined to agree about vandalism now, also possible sockpuppetry. Have reverted, and posted stage 1 warning on talk page of new IP. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 23:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Another piece of advice needed, which WP:ADS does not clear up for me.

Should we tag user talk pages as advertisements, or should it just be articles in the more common style? I have stumbled upon User talk:Ramanbasu while fighting linkspam, and his talk page is written like an advertisement, for something called 'track-issue', including an external link to the product (and since 31 July 2006 as well!). Don't want to tag for speedy delete, as my comment about his/her linkspamming needs to stay.

Sorry to keep on, but it's hard to find second opinions from sensible people sometimes!

Please advise at your leisure, no hurry. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 12:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Just to let you know, I am looking into it. I will be a bit busy but I should have all the answers by end of the day! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

No rush! Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 13:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

"Crunk" Vandal[edit]

I would recommend extending the block to indefinite on the "crunk" vandal due to his recent use of a sock:

Dude111i (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

User:HighInBC already did that! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:11, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Wow he is fast! However User:Monkiiiii received a 24 hour block, so you might want to look into that.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 19:13, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• Done. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Many thanks for correcting my balls up on WP:RFCN regarding the header, and generally sorting me out whenever I need help and on behalf of the wiki community for your great work on AIV. Enjoy this barnstar (note you should feel privaliged as its only the 2nd I've given out!!)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For all your great work helping on all the tedius tasks on wikipedia, especially your consistency on WP:AIV and WP:RFCN RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 21:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

I am honored. Thank you! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:32, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Tim Saunders[edit]

but that's not the point. u habven#t answered my quesiton. u cand just delete stuff without telling anyone. u murdered Maggie May (dog), im not going to let u murder gwenno's dad too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC).

cos there was an article there before a good one on gwenno's dad whose some lingist or sthg, in we;sh and cornish and it dissappeared. i just wanna no where it went. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilyfan87 (talk • contribs) .

It was deleted because it did not meet wikipedias notability requirements. It has actually been deleted 4 times as not meeting wikipedias requirements for an article. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

says who

i know u keep saying you want to ban me, but i dont understand cos I just want to no what happened to it cos ur not answeting my question so im askin you why what happen and r u gonna ban me for just askin?

I wont block you for asking, no. I already told you. the article has been deleted. I have reviewd the deleted revision and it does not meet wikipedias notability requirements. You have now been notified of this and if you re-create the deleted article, and it does not meet those requirements, you will probably get a short block for being disruptive. I have answered the question several times, the article was deleted. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Vandal[edit]

Hi. It seems someone wants to be blocked Special:Contributions/151.199.192.141. Regards, Mairene 14:30, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

DONE. Thanks for bringing that to my intention. In the future though, WP:AIV is a more appropriate venue to handle such cases! Thanks -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Help Needed (part 2)[edit]

Help Needed Not sure if this is right, but I need help.. you recently deleted a page about a student named Brandon Breedwell. I need the page to remain up. Please check the talk page of it for more information. Thanks. AquaStreak 01:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I am sorry but you failing a class does not meet wikipedias notability criteria. You will need a much better argument based on wikipedia policy for the article to be re-instated. However, if you feel that this deletion was improperly done you are welcome to submit it for Deletion Review. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok well then, what can I do to bring it back? Its very important, and the Darter Company (technology devision at my school) lady is in our class today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AquaStreak (talk • contribs)

You cannot bring it back. That is not what wikipedia is for. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Please listen[edit]

I really don't get it. Special:Contributions/125.164.161.204 / Special:Contributions/125.164.161.33 are doing several things wrong. For one, they're mostly removing content from certain articles, placing a category that doesn't exist yet over one that does, and adding wierd categories like "domestic animals" and "Dragon Ball villains" that don't even exist. In all seriousness, I suggest a soft block for each one (including the ones that are likely from the same block) because most of the edits were redlinks that I specifically told them not to do, and yet, they deliberately did it as following each other's examples. THEY DID MORE HARM THAN GOOD. It was really annoying reverting almost everyhing hey did using popups. Let this be a way of teaching them a lesson. Power level (Dragon Ball) 17:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

We don't block to teach lessons. We block to prevent damage. They are not currently editing those articles, ergo no block is warrented at this time.--Isotope23 17:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The wikipedia blocking policy specifically states, "Blocking is how administrators prevent a user account or IP address/range from editing Wikipedia. Blocks are used to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia and should not be used as a punitive measure". If I block that IP address, how do I know that the next person who comes along, 10 hours after the last edit, is the same person? I dont. I could block that IP, and an interested individual tries to edit an article he sees a mistake in, and gives up. The evidence you provided shows that is more than likley a shared or dynamic IP address. Blocking it would be pointless at this point and would teach nobody a lesson. If you warn them approprialty when it happens and report it to WP:AIV, that is the best option in this situation. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I hear ya.[edit]

Yeah; I archive every 30 headers, ever since becoming an admin I have had a heavy load of messages. I don't mind though, the earlier situation was dealt with (the IP personal info poster). I blocked him (soft) for 6 months, thank you for your help. ~ Arjun 18:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Your question on WT:RFA[edit]

I think the answer is: a Wikipedian was nominated for adminship in December by a non-admin, it failed. They were nommed by an admin < two months later and they passed! Or am I reading between the lines a bit too much? I'm sure there have been many admins successfully nommed by non-admins. :) Bubba hotep 20:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Maybye my question was malformed. The numbers i was looking for is how much more likley is promotion, if nommed by an current admin as opposed to not. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, and I think I just answered that, didn't I? Much more likely. :P Bubba hotep 21:00, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I did not get the reference as first. I get it now. (DUHHHHH). It actually had nothing to do with that (really). I recently started to notice a patern that the quality of the nom was almost as important as the answers to the question. still cant believe I missed the reference in the first pose. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Lolski. Have another cup of coffee, Chris. :D Bubba hotep 21:09, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I need it! Its been one of those weeks where you are always 2 steps behind (in real life. But on the plus side, ive been keeping up with wikipedia!). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I absolve you of all blame for the lack of "getting the reference" - because you the prospective admin in question were was, in fact, nommed in November, not December as originally stated. Oops. Then again, should the question be "How many candidates passed after the first !vote being an oppose (other than the nom/co-nom's support)? That would be interesting to test the theory of SNOW! Bubba hotep 21:36, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

←I agree, that would be an interesting statistic. ANd then again, a statistic of, "the number of rfas which passed with an 20 line Oppose from CRZ as the forst !vote" would also be interesting. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:37, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I've just got back from perusing the great "Joke Banner" debate of 2007. Sheesh, that's a looong discussion. Bubba hotep 21:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: (archived message) user talk page as advertisement[edit]

I have tagged this page with the 'advert' template, as there needs to be some sort of marker on it. If this is incorrect, please remove. Thanks. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 21:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Holy crap! I am sooo sorry man. I saw it, it needed to be deleted. I will go ahead and do that. thank you again for your patience. I ended up with 900 things coming at me from all sides (not an excuse, I know). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

In that situation a ((db-g11)) would probably have been appropriate and gotten it deleted much quicker. It was spam and qwualified for speedy deletion. If that failed, it should have been taken to WP:MFD. Nevertheless, I deleted the page as spam. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I did look at that one. I know now (my education here continues!) - thanks once again for your help. Eventually I will stop bugging you :-) Cheers Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 21:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

It is NEVER bugging me. That is what I am here for. Is to help people. I am sorry I accidently archived it while i had not responded. You took the right course of action with a gentle reminder! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar[edit]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your commendable courtesy and assistance in maintaining order amid a contentious debate, I hereby award the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar. —David Levy 21:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thank you for the lovely anthropomorphic fruit.  :-) —David Levy 21:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Chrislk02, I've challenged David Levy to demonstrate his good faith about this by actually going back and re-establishing the "new message" alerts or allowing me to do so with no protest. I hope that he'll agree to that. (→Netscott) 21:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Might be pushing your luck. I have to leave for a while so i do not want to get invovled further where I cant follow up. if he disagress however, I would not push the button. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Finally sence[edit]

Finally someone has spoken some sence that is not involved.--Lucy-marie 23:35, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Could you please post the same on the other editors talk pages.--Lucy-marie 23:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your note on my user page discussion. I do not think I need to 'calm down a little bit'; however, if you want to know more about the background I would refer you to the discussion page of BNP at Talk:British National Party#Intro. I would also refer you to User:Lucy-marie's discussion page, but she has just archived it. Emeraude 23:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Found it. She has not linked it , but it is at User talk:Lucy-marie/Archive 3. I would question why someone should hide a talk page when an examination is going on, especially as the page is hardly 'full'. Emeraude 21:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Neutral third party[edit]

Yes please! This really isn't going to get solved otherwise. One Night In Hackney 23:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

It's basically a dispute that I'm in the thick of as well, centred around this page. I was thinking about going for RFC, but what I'll probably do is prepare a sub-page in my user space outlining all the problems complete with diffs and you can look it over and see if it can be sorted out without it getting too formal, and if it can't be sorted out I've still got the information I need to take it further. Sound reasonable? One Night In Hackney 23:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Sounds great!. I will do a little research myself. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

See the page here. If you want to use the (as yet uncreated) talk page for it that would probably be best. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 02:42, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I will look over it. I will probably do the most of the work tomorow! Thanks again. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Countries you've visited[edit]

I just noticed the flags on your user page under the heading "Countries I have been in". I ought to point out that if you're showing the flags of England and Scotland, you shouldn't be showing the UK flag. Pedantry perhaps, but to put it in a US context, it would be like me showing, under 'countries' I've visited, the Stars and Stripes and then the flags of Virginia, California and Hawaii (which of course has a UK flag at the top). Either show the components or the whole. Does it matter? Probably not. Emeraude 00:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I will fix it tomorow! Im not at my usualy computer, but a laptop that is not half as conveneient! Thanks again. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 00:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Only if you really want to. As I said, it is probably pedantry gone wild on my part and I'm not sure it matters, but I hope you enjoyed your time in England and Scotland. Shame you didn't get to Wales though. Emeraude 21:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

My Response.[edit]

I replied on my talk page, so if you want, you can keep the discussion centered by replying there.

I saw your message on Bubba Hotep's talk page, as I noticed my user page linked to there. I occasionally Google my username, only out of curiosity. You and I aren't the only ones with outisders hating us: I believe RyanPostlethwaite had people hate him as well. Acalamari 20:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

I kind of look at it as a good thing! I am making enough of an impression that people have a problem with me. I personally dont have a problem with it! (It actually makes me feel that my effors on wikipedia do not go unnotices (which i am sure all of us feel from time to time)). The same goes for userpage vandalism. I feel that when my userpage gets vandalized, it means i am doing a good job! There are also many paeople watching my page (as well as yours) and when those vandal do strike, there is an army ready to strike them down! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Did you know is 10 Hours old[edit]

Did you know is 10 Hours old --Hirakawacho 10:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Joke "new message" guidelines[edit]

Chris, when you get back from your wikibreak I invite you to join the discussion on initial guidelines. Thanks. (→Netscott) 18:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Rock music Wikiproject invitation[edit]

Hello WikiProject Metal member.
WikiProject Metal music is important in expanding encyclopedic coverage of the metal. It brings attention to the lesser-known bands, and significantly improves the quality of the famous ones. Five Featured articles and two formers is proof of that.
This is the stuff I wish to achieve with the somewhat recently resurrected WikiProject Rock music. I hope to also attract attention to rock music articles of all sorts, and hopefully change some to GA or FA status. I invite you to come join us, and embrace the links between metal and rock music in general.
Rock on.
-- Reaper X 04:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Suck up[edit]

r u still sucking up to your buds at the air wiki project ?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Headphonos (talk • contribs) 23:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC).

don,t stalk me and act like a tard and there won't be a problem ..bye —Preceding unsigned comment added by Headphonos (talk • contribs)

Afd to close/relist[edit]

The Diane Solomon Afd has been open for two weeks now, I think it hasn't been listed on the log page for some reason. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 08:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Done, closed as Keep -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. Can you take a look at ASCII comic for me please? Grue added the Nerd Boy information to this article.[25]. Nerd Boy was originally deleted after this Afd discussion. Grue has since recreated Nerd Boy as a redirect, which seems to be circumventing the process to me. The Nerd Boy information in the ASCII comic article is bigger than the article was previously. I did remove the information from the ASCII article and list the redirect for speedy deletion, but Grue has reverted my changes, and I don't want to start reverting an administrator, but it doesn't seem quite right to me. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 17:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Before I get too far into this. Have you expressed your concernts to the administrator in question? They often make mistakes, may think it was closed as redirect instead of delete or have rationalization behind there decision. If you have contacted them and you still feel there is an issu, I would be much more comfterable getting involved. Hope this helps! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

If it was an independent administrator I wouldn't even have bothered you, but if you look at the Afd you'll see Grue was heavily involved in the deletion discussion. Bogdangiusca has just redirected the page to ASCII art anyway, so I don't think there's that much of a problem now, as that article is pretty comprehensive. One Night In Hackney 17:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

That said Grue has just reverted it back... One Night In Hackney 17:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I will investigate a little further. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

←It appears as though the other party involved is adminsitrator User:Bogdangiusca, who claims to be a rouge admin. It looks like the redirect is staying. I do not see much of a reason to get too involved here. I have posted a comment on the redirects talk page expressing my agreement with the redirect etc etc. Hope this helps. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I just thought it best an uninvolved third party reviewed the situation, so I'm happy now. One Night In Hackney 17:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Just so you know, the ascii comment article is now up for afd. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to User:Chrislk02:[edit]

Your recent edit to User:Chrislk02 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

HAHAHAHAHHAH, um yea, no. This bot needs to be fixed. (last I checked, remocing vandalism from my own page is not vandalism). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Chris, technically your user page is still part of editable space and therefore does not actually belong to you. So, technically, you are a vandal. I suggest a punitive block on yourself of a gazillion seconds. :D Bubba hotep 20:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Guilty as charged. Should I filed a request for check user to prove, I, as a sock of myself, vandalized my own page, then re-vandalized it by removing the vandalisation replaced by the bot? Well, that made my head hurt, whatever the hell I just said. Now, let me enter polite admin mode. "Bubba, thank you for your recent request that I block myself for a gazillaion seconds. I however will have to deny this request. The actions that I took were well within wikipedias policies. Thank you again for your concern with the well being of wikipedia and if you have any concerns regarding this, please feel free to contact me on my tlak page. Thanks again!" (as i said, polite admin mode) :) -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, yes you would be right not to block yourself as it is against policy to block an editor with whom you are actively engaged in a content dispute with, i.e. yourself. I suggest taking yourself to WP:AN/I and starting, responding to, countermanding, and finishing a request for comment on yourself. Then ask for a third opinion. :) Bubba hotep 20:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

um, i will get RIGHT on that, (ok, maybye not)! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I wonder, can an admin Wheel war with themselves? HAHAHA, that would be bizarre! I will randomly engage in wheel warring behavior with myself. lol. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Just as long as you're not uncivil to yourself, and don't revert yourself more than three times! And while you're doing all that, it'd probably be advisable to stay away from articles relating to dog breeds (or rat breeds, for that matter). Akradecki 20:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

I think we need to look at the big picture here. Obviously, there's a major COI for Chris to be editing User:Chrislk02. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Is it a username problem, should I bring myself up for a WP:RFCN? I guess it poses the bigger problem, are we all in WP:COI by editing under usernames? I think I should get a list of all users with usernames and request that they be blocked for WP:COI. Whos in? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

You make an excellent point, EVula. Not to mention the fact that he is adding unsourced userboxes about his lifestyle, also contravening autobiographical guidelines in the process. Oh, deary me, Chris. One big can of worms, here. Good job VoABot brought it to our attention so soon. Bubba hotep 20:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh the irony. the ease at which stuff gets added and the dificulty at which it gets taken away. I.E., the vandalism with replaced my page with (FAG), and the anti vandalism bot replacing it. I wonder if the antivandal bot knows something about me that I dont? I did get drunk this weekend but i think i would remeber if i hooked up with an antivandal bot. strange...-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Me thinks Chrislk doth protest too much. Sorry, just wanted to slip that in somewhere! Bubba hotep 21:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

"Once you go bot, you never go back"... I don't think that's the exact phrase, but whatever. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Oh my, Chris! Now it seems you've started stalking yourself! You ought to ask yourself not to post on yourown page, but rather to respond only on your own page. :) - BillCJ 21:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

hahahahaha, I guess I am just a problem editor. I probably need a cooldown block, and should file a request for arbitration against myself for disruptive editing, POV pushing, wheel warring with myself, block evasion, wiki stalking myself and edit warring couple with a WP:COI per evula for my username and my autobio violations per Bubba. Am I a bad apple or what? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

HEy[edit]

Hey ummm... am i allowed to put pornography slang talk deffinitions on here??? Like.... cream pie.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rstyslde32 (talk • contribs)

why do you ask? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

How to do a AfD 2nd nom.[edit]

Title says it all. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 21:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Hello??? ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 02:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I didn't... ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 17:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to AfD the "Cleaners (Max Payne)" article; that article does not need to exist. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 17:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome[edit]

Greetings and thanks for the welcome on my talk page. I'm actually a regular on a non-wikipedia wiki, but new to the wikipedia world. I post with my RealName on my other wiki, but since my Wikipedia interest is non-work related, I made a sockpuppet (Shhh!). I have what I consider good reason though - I wouldn't want people thinking my wiki posts relect some kind of professional opinion. I'm learning all sorts of new wikipedia-rules though, so I will be sure to return with questions as I need them. (And I'm stealing the ((userpage)) template code to put on my own homepage, because it's a good idea.) Cheers, Doodlemuck 23:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Jeopardy! in popular culture[edit]

I don't believe there was consensus for the deletion of this page. There were 4 delete votes and 3 keep votes. Robert K S 01:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

GIve me an hour, I am on the phone and then i will recheck and explain my decision or retract it! Thanks for bringing it to my attention. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I promise this is important to me. It will be tommorow morning before I look at it though! Thanks again -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Take your time. You might also consider that the delete votes came from users who have not edited the Jeopardy! article and have not be involved in the spinning-off of some of its material onto other pages, whereas the keep votes came from editors who have been involved with the discussions and decision-making on the Category:Jeopardy! family of articles. Robert K S 06:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

First off, your claims that the keep votes are from people involved in the article greatly weakn your argument for overturning this. Please remeber that an afd is not a vote, and I did not view this particular one as a vote. I had some dificulty closing it but after reviewing each sides arguments and taking all things into account, I felt the consensus was to delete. Here is why.

1. Mango juice has a pretty good nom coupled with a Delete as well as counters arguments well in policy. To me, this discounts a keep !vote.
2. You, by your own admission, state that the keep votes have a Conflict of Interest in this issue due to there involvement in the Jeopardy! article, and the categories associated with it. This also discounts the !keep votes.
3. Reywas' Strong Keep does not have a good policy based argument behind it so, I see it as a Keep. As well, Andy SaundersStrong keep, but clean up does not address the issues originiall posed by the nominator as well as the opposers.
4. If i were counting it as a vote, there are 5 Deletes including the nom. 3 Keeps and 2 Merges. Looking at these numbers, it may appears as if there is no consensus however, I saw that the majority of wikipedia editors that have no apparent conflict of interest were either for Delete or Merge as were mostly based in policy and other concerns often expressed in relation to trivia sections. The Keep arguements did not address the concerns that it was an indiscriminate and unsourced collection yet based there argument on the fact that the information in this article was forked off to prevent unwiedly growth in the Jeopardy! article, and did not address any of the concerns related to the actual content. It is for all of these reasons that I stand by my orignial delete decision. If you still have an issue with this, please feel free to take it to Deletion Review. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

A user's having edited an article does not constitute a conflict of interest when the user contributes to a deletion discussion. Conversely, the users who called for the deletion of the article were unfamiliar with the article's history and the problems involved in trying to keep the Jeopardy! article down to size. To me (and to the others who said keep) the material was valuable, but was rightly spun off of the main article for size reasons. I disagree with and am disappointed by your decision. Robert K S 17:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Mike Riley (referee)[edit]

Hi, Chris. Could you take a look at the above page when you have a mo'. Are you happy to leave the foul-mouthed, opinionated post in there by 86.0.230.142? Considering the page is supposed to be about the article and not the subject's integrity or personal life? Let me know. Thanks. Refsworldlee^(chew-fat)(eds) 13:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I removed it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Moon raker[edit]

How are you? Have a guess whoese house this is? It looks exactly like it!!! I am using in in the article to identify the setting! Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I wonder if that was where it was filemd at? the resemebleance is uncanny. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi I have just added a complete missing synopsis to From Russia with Love (film) can you beleive there was no coverage of the actual film itself. What do you think? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

UCFD[edit]

I have nominated a category you created, Category:Wikipedians with 6 siblings, for merging. You can contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. Thanks, VegaDark 22:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

AIV[edit]

Hello, Chris AIV has been back logged for some time now. I did't know if any Admins were awareof this.  Planetary Chaos  Talk to me  22:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome message worked![edit]

Hey, don't know if you noticed, but our welcome messages worked in harmony! I posted the new general welcome message to User:Bigmac3, he signed up and you posted the project welcome. I guess it's one of those little things where it's nice to see the system work for the first time. Akradecki 02:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I did notice that. That was pretty cool! I relaly like working in this project. I guess the irony is i am in a flight class right now (should be paying attention to airspace and stuf flike that but cant drag myself away from wikipedia)-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 02:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Blocking the vandal[edit]

I reported them already for vandalizing Led Zeppelin which is why they decided to vandalize me, just don't get too crazy with the blocks :) . Darthgriz⁹⁸ 18:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) There was nothing crasy about it at all. They had been approprialy warned and continued to vandalize after the final warning. Perfect example of who to block! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 19:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I know I'm just saying. These vandals need to come up with more creative things to say than you suck or you're gay ha ha. Darthgriz⁹⁸ 20:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I, in all honesty, appreciated a creative vandal. I enjoy getting a laugh from them. However, boring vandals suck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

How to handle mirror sites?[edit]

Chris, I need advice. I came across 3 edits (SR-71 Blackbird here, F-117 Nighthawk here, and C-130 Hercules here) where a new editor, User:Sammy9990 added External links to his personal website which is essentially material taken directly from Wikipedia. I've reverted these, but haven't yet left a note for the editor. I vaguely recall something about how mirrors are supposed to be registered and the GFDL licensing must be included when material is used (I can't find anything like this on his site, [26], other than a statement that he has "permission"). I'm way behind on my admin coaching reading list (too busy actually editing!), so while I'm sure there's something in there I should know, I thought maybe you could advise on the best course on this? Akradecki 21:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I dont know alot about it and I am on my way out for the day. I do know there is a wikipedia article on mirrors that is located here Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks. I will look at it in detail later! Good luck and thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

It's been a week since my recent request for adminship passed, and since I haven't managed to delete the Main Page - yet - I figure it's safe to send these out. Thanks a lot for participating in my RfA; I hope to do a good job. If you see me doing something wrong, need help, or just want to have a chat, please don't hesitate to drop by :) – riana_dzasta 07:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your enthusiastic support, I appreciate it! Please feel free to keep an eye on me, and my use of the tools. All the best, – riana_dzasta 07:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Usernames[edit]

Before I go to WP:RFCN can you think as to why these were blocked for username violations?

• Bobgalbraith (talk · contribs)
• Asdf123asdf (talk · contribs)

Cheers RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 16:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• • I could see why asdf123asdf nmight have been. Is there a famous person names Bobgalbraith? That is the only reason I can think the first might be. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I get Bob Galbraith to bea photographer to the associated press (AP) news agency, it that famous enough for a username block?? Regarding Asdf123asdf, do you think its because its random? RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

How recent are the blocks? I dont know about bob galbreath, that sounds like a good one for WP:RFCN. Asdf123asdf is probablt good blocked(in my opnion). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

This morning, so I'll bring up Bobgalbraith at WP:RFCN, thanks for the advice RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow Chris, thanks for the barnstar. As I've said to you numerous times before, encouragement from you, really does entice me work harder on the projet. I really think many users should take a leaf out of your book, it should be about teamwork. Thanks again RyanPostlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV[edit]

Hi. I reported User:67.113.50.2 to AIV as a test case for soft blocks. It's arguable if the IP has contributed anything to Wikipedia. It's probably a high school library computer, and the vandalism from it has been persistent. Xiner (talk, email) 18:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Please read WP:BLOCK for our blocking policy. The user had not edited recnetly and only had 1 edit today. Blcoks will not be punitive. Hope this helps! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not arguing for a punitive block. The user's history is just an example of why I don't think there'd be much collateral damager if a block is placed on the IP, and there's been more than one edit. Xiner (talk, email) 17:59, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Gotcha. Makes sense. If they vandalize again, let me know and I will block. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

How not to get unblocked?[edit]

10/10 for effort. Are you any further along looking through the (lengthy) BNP dispute? Thanks. One Night In Hackney 22:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Thanks[edit]

No problem. I always have an eye out for vandals. Unfortunately all I can do is de-vandalize, I can't really write an article for my life. Seems I won't be getting an admin position anytime soon. lol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nol888 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC). Nol888_(Talk) 03:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) MUST SIGN COMMENTS...

Help[edit]

I'm a bit new to categories, and after looking through the help info I'm still not sure of the best way to proceed. I was thinking about creating a category for winners of the Laureus World Sports Awards, it would probably be one all encompassing category rather than seperate categories for each award, but I can do it the other way if you think it's better? There is currently a Category:Laureus World Sports Awards, which has five subpages. So would I create a new category (tentatively called Laureus World Sports Awards winners) as part of the existing category? If so, how do I create it as a sub-category? Thanks. One Night In Hackney 14:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Worked great thanks. In the course of adding categories I've come across a problem I can't solve on Kelly Holmes. This edit added more information about medals and championships, but I can't see where all the garbage in the infobox came from, or work out how to get rid of it. Thanks. One Night In Hackney 15:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV reports[edit]

Hey! Thanks for your reports to WP:AIV. However, in the future, please make sure that vandals reported have vandalized PAST the final warning. Most recently. User:165.234.180.57 was reported by you. This user has 1 edit today and 1 warning. They may repeat or they may not. Many admins will imemdiatly remove such cases to be reported later if the vandalism continues. Hope this helps and thanks again. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

The user in question had a bv less than 24 hours ago. Isnt that considered vandalism past final warning? Corpx 15:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

With that large a gap and it being an anon IP, generally not. There generally needs to be clear evidence that it is the same person commiting the act of vandalism and a gap that large, especially if it is a school ip, is generally not a large enough gap. I generally look for vandalism within 30 minutes, sometimes an hour but not 12 hours or so. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I have again removed a anon WP:AIV entry that you reported that had not been warned in 2 days. I am not going to notify you again when I do this, but this is just a courtesy letting you know that, if vandals are not approriatly warned, many admin will just remove it from the list. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I wasnt really sure about the last person so I thought I'd leave it up to the discretion of an admin Corpx 17:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Re: Barnstar[edit]

Thanks! I should point out that my AIV reports weren't always quite that precise – as you'll see if you look through my discussion archives, I had a number of complaints a while back. I was never that good at keeping track of what warning level a user had been given, and I was always reporting them at the wrong time. In the end, I modified my anti-vandalism software to keep track of warning levels itself – now I can't report a user unless it's satisfied they've had a final warning. But I think the results are effective. Thanks again – Qxz 16:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

We all start a little rough around the edges! However, you have done an excellent job adapting. I love seeing your reprots at WP:AIV because I know they are good! Keep up the excellent work i could see you with the mop someday. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, I'm not sure about that. Don't you need to have written featured articles and have experience with things like image licensing (which I don't understand at all), as well as have all the policies and guidelines committed to memory? I know I haven't been here long, but I'm hopeless at writing, nor am I any use at resolving disputes or stuff like that, so... I can't quite see myself in that position. Nice that you think so, though – Qxz 16:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Sprotect[edit]

While you're here, could you please sprotect Colin Cowherd. Thanks Corpx 17:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Another admin beat me to it! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:15, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Nomination time[edit]

Chris, please add your part of the joint requests for adminship for Bubba hotep :) --Alf ^melmac 22:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Excellent, just in time before we waved Oriel off the Main Page too :) Nice one.--Alf ^melmac 00:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Pallywood[edit]

Following the recent AfD discussion on Pallywood, I've made some changes to the article to address your concerns about original research. Please feel free to comment at Talk:Pallywood. -- ChrisO 11:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

There was consensus to delete Jeopardy! in popular culture?[edit]

By what criteria did you judge that there was consensus to delete the Jeopardy! in popular culture article? I certainly failed to see consensus there. Andy Saunders 06:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

I have already explained my decision here. thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:47, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

re Allen Smithee[edit]

Ah, so THAT explains it. I was wondering why everyone was piling on Mr Smithee suddenly. Herostratus 13:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Unsigned (probably regarding Tommy & Rumble)[edit]

Pretty prtty deleting legit links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tj mcdougal (talk • contribs)

Many thanks returned[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar. Would you mind if I moved it to my user page instead of user talk? Sam Blacketer 23:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

unblocking of 66.93.251.114[edit]

Hey we really appreciate you unblocking us over here, a couple of hardcore gamers that come here have been in a spat with JonHarder over the past couple of months over 1 external link in a article. JonHarder just happens to have a couple admins on his side that he works with to have everything go his way. Thanks for yoru help! 66.93.251.114 04:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

This IP has been very abusive in the past and the contribution history does not suggest a shared IP at all. I encourage you to consider restoring the warnings to the talk page for now so that if trouble brews (which would not surprise me), admins and others new to this user will know the history. JonHarder's one of the easiest editors I know of to get along with -- this passing swipe at him should give you some sense of 66.93.251.114. and the extent to which he/she now may or may not be prepared to work civilly.

I think Coinopkid (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) is his alter ego.[27]

See also this partial list of background items:

• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive146#Spam socks including[28]
  • User talk:4.231.201.116
  • User talk:Freakdomination (such as this version prior to his blanking his user page)
  • User talk:66.93.251.126 (including earlier, deleted warnings)
• Ongoing battles over the same links 3 months later at LAN gaming center
• Talk:LAN gaming center#External Links
• Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2006 Archive Nov#LAN Gaming Center

--A. B. ^(talk) 22:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Uhhh ... I just deleted one of the the controversial links[29] from LAN gaming center and got a level3 vandalism warning from new user HonJarder (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). Can you look into this? I'm not keen on deleting warnings from my own page -- it sets a bad precedent for all the spammers I warn. Thanks, --A. B. ^(talk) 23:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Kiarostami featured article candidate[edit]

Hi. Abbas Kiarostami has now had a a lot of work and is now virtually complete - it may be out of your field of expertise, but please read it through and review and leave your decision Hey also see From Russia with Love films I have added a full synopsis with some cool images Ernst Stavro Blofeld 14:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Move request[edit]

Chris, can you move the ATR 42/72 article to ATR 72? The relevant discussiona are on ATR and ATR 42/72. I have not started a formal move discussion, as the particiapants so far have been in favor of it. However, if you recommend posting a move template and polling for consensus, I will do that. Thanks. - BillCJ 16:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Done! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that was fast! Thanks. Nice having admins in the Project! - BillCJ 16:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem! Anything I can do to help. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

it also helps that you caught me here during the 9 hours a day I spend at a desk on a computer (when I would much rather be flying). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Inappropriate userpage[edit]

Thanks for your prompt action. --Dweller 18:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem, thats what I am here for. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 18:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

my warning[edit]

i have left you a reply on my talk page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BigTimeGamer (talk • contribs) 01:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

Email[edit]

Replied. I've created a couple of redirects because it has been raised previously. —Moondyne 02:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Amelia Earhart[edit]

Thanks for the offer to look into this dispute. The editor in question is Gwen Gale and the information you need to reference is the extensive discussion page on Talk:Amelia Earhart where in almost every discussion, there is an extensive discourse in which this editor engages. The most recent example is the challenge over whether Amelia Earhart can be considered an aviation "pioneer" which has been inextricably linked to an assessment of her flying abilities. Despite a number of concerns raised over the tenor of the debate as well as refusals to accept any refererenced sources that do not comply with her viewpoint, the editor in question has again reverted the introductory passage. Bzuk 2:48 28 February 2007 (UTC).

I have looked at it and there is no clear cut case of edit warring that i can find in the last 50 edits (Then again, i may be blind and not seeing it). If you could provide some diffs of each version it would be very helpful. Thanks -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 14:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Unblock request at User talk:Freakdomination[edit]

I am now too personally involved in this to respond, especially as I have already replied at his previous unblock request. Would you mind assisting the user with a response. —Moondyne 06:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Done. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Templete for deletion[edit]

How does one go through the process of abandoning a nomination/removing nomination of a template for deletion? SatuSuro 12:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• 1.7 Template:Campaignbox templates - could you see that the nominator withdraws - how does it get followed up? SatuSuro 12:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Replied on users talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for that done -SatuSuro 14:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Name removal[edit]

Are you sure that they were indeed added legitimately ? None of them had any edits in their edit history. Travelbird

Is a 50% vandal edit ratio acceptable from a shared IP?[edit]

Hi there Your reasonable point is that blocking an IP with a proportion of good edits would result in a loss of irreplaceable contributions while vandal edits can always be reverted. I suspect you may be right but I want to argue the other side with you.

• Vandal edits are not always reverted. Hardest to spot are unsourced valid sounding assertions or assertions with references to fake offline hard to verify sources (eg a reference to a non-existent paragrapgh in an out of print book.) Good faith editors wouldn't do this but an editor with a history of vandalism may.
  • This is true, however, with todays recent armies of RC patrollers it is difficult. The first thing i check when I get a Wp:AIV report is the contribs. I view all of them on top and see if they were vandalism and revert them all if necessary. However, some may slip through the cracks. The plus to this is, anybody can look through the edit historyu, find who added it and determine if it was an appropriate addition or not. If it isent, be bold and remove it! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with the opinion that valid-sounding nonsense is reliably detected and removed, particularly for articles that deal with complex subjects. As an editor most of my work has been on articles where access to primary sources is limited (because you need to look them up in books) and the number of people interested in the topics is low compared with pop culture. In such cases a tremendous amount of nonsense has accumulated in some articles and has remained there for a long time. Buddhipriya 23:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• • • Agreed
• Malicious edits with high longevity are destructive to Wikipedia's reputation.
  • I will agree, however forcing IP's to register will not stop the vandalism. They will keep getting throw away accounts and keep on vandalising. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Agreed
• Softblocks on shared static IPs restrict anonymous contributors but registration is fast and easy.
  • I personally, especially at new sites, am very adverse to signing up. Especialyl in todays internet world, there are many negative connotations to signing up including eternal spam (which isent here but the stereotype holds over). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Requiring a sign-up is a deterrent and I wouldn't advocate it for all IPs just those with a history of vandalism. Wikipedia's sign-up is the least onerous I have ever seen.
• A block is time-limited so good edits are only lost for a short period.
  • Where do you draw the time limit, 5 minutes, 10 minutes? what is appropriate. If we block too short editors get mad. if we block to long other admin get mad. I personally have no problem with a short term block and very reguuarly block for 24 or 48 hours. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • It has to be longer than the average interval between vandal edits from that IP
• Wikipedia may have needed an extremely open approach when it was growing from nothing but now it has a huge database of good edits to protect. A single vandal edit can remove the valid contributions of a number of good editors.
  • And a single dedit cna bring it back. And, no matter what happens, in the history all good edits are still presevred and readily available to be reverted to. On the other hand, most vandals type out there stuff and it takes them alot longer to vandalize then it takes us to revert it. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Agreed
• Each new good edit has a value and that value is lost when a shared IP block prevents a good contribution. However each vandal edit requires a reversion and each reversion is time lost that otherwise could have been spent fixing a mistake, removing an unsourced assertion etc.
  • There are many editors who devote there time here to RC patrol. I myself started there. I like to write but i also hve no problem cleaning up other peoples messes occaitonally. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Editing time is finite so each reversion represent the loss of a potential good edit
• Vandal edits encourage positive contributors to leave, resulting in a loss of future good edits
  • This is true, and a valid point. I kind of view it like fredom of speech and deomcracy. I belive it was benjamin franklin who said, "he who gives up a little lbertry for protection deserves neither" (I am sure i slauightered that quote). -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
    • From wikiquote: 'Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety'. Editing Wikipedia anonymously is hardly an 'essential liberty'. Franklin may have been thinking about holding suspects without charge or trial for years, torture, assassination and other human rights abuses that Americans would never think of authorizing. Wikipedia's balance between freedom to edit and authority has been an unusual strategy and highly successful up to now, but I really don't know if it is the most pragmatic approach now that the project has reached critical mass with every topic under the sun covered.

Curtains99 16:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The problems with expert retention on Wikipedia make interesting reading, and includes examples of how failure to deal with disruptive users drive away those who could make contributions on the most difficult topics. Buddhipriya 23:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Do you know how I can delete my user account? Curtains99 17:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not leaving in a huff because I don't like the vandalism policy. That would be a breach of wp:point !. I just don't have the time to continue as I have a lot of work on. Thanks for you help! Curtains99 17:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

RE: project tags[edit]

thanks.. are you going to do it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.68.7.90 (talk • contribs)

• Already did. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

thanks.. all the best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.68.7.90 (talk • contribs)

• No problem! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Anti concensus[edit]

The edits reverted are anti concensus so how do i complain about that please pont me in the right direction and can you please look at the discussions before blocking.--Lucy-marie 21:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

plesae see here [30] and here [31]--Lucy-marie 21:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Also hackney and i have a history so it is hardly surprising he is jumping to get me blocked.--Lucy-marie 21:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

3RR[edit]

No it's regarding G8, and I'm well aware of my proximity to the limit. I've tried repeatedly to get lucy-marie to inform all concerned parties (the infobox and template need to be consistent) but she refuses and does her usual trick of claiming consensus based on the fact nobody has replied (because they don't know about the discussion), or in the case of the template based on a three week old pair of posts on the talk page that have since been superceded by various edits to the template, and they don't even refer to the current version. One Night In Hackney 21:04, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

G8 history shows 4 reverts, she's only up to 3 on the template. One Night In Hackney 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I think hackney wants me blocked. please correct me if i am wrong.--Lucy-marie 21:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I have in the past reported hackney for personal attacks and no actionwas taken can have action taken over that if action is to be taken over this.--Lucy-marie 21:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Please dont point fingers at other editors. It is about the content, not placing the blame or being the victim. I am looking into this. In the meantime, please remeber, always be cool and civil. Thanks! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The EU have been represented at all meetings since 1977, that is a fact. The EU cannot actually join the G8, otherwise they would have. Instead they are represented at every meeting. A previous version of the page didn't make this clear, so it was amended to this version. Does it state the EU are members? No, but it still makes it clear they are represented, which is a fact and can therefore be included. This is the preferred version of several editors, and I as I said earlier the template and article need to be consistent. Lucy-marie has ignored repeated requests for her to inform all concerned parties before performing her "nobody has replied, therefore I have consensus" trick, and has repeatedly refused to do so. It is a change she wishes to make, therefore it isn't unreasonable for her to do so. Instead I get replies like this saying she doesn't have to because it isn't policy. One Night In Hackney 21:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack[edit]

Or more accurately to protect the page on your preferred version, like you have done before. One Night In Hackney. Is this a personal attack?--Lucy-marie 21:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• ? i dont understand what you are saying? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

That was posted on my talk page after i said i had had the page protected. I find it an attack saying i only protect pages to snub other revisions.

Coukd you please have a look at the G8 template as well for concensus.--Lucy-marie 21:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I am pretty sure that the decision that stands on the G8 article will also apply to the G8 template. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you could you please make that clear on the template talk page.--Lucy-marie 21:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Unequivocal evidence has been produced. One Night In Hackney 21:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Where?--Lucy-marie 21:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• On the G8 talk page. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok evidence of what? I see no unequivocal evidence on that talk page.--Lucy-marie 21:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

• Please use the articles discussion page to discuss this page, not mine. Thanks. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 21:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ok sorry.--Lucy-marie 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure which edit your message referred to, please elaborate. One Night In Hackney 21:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Guidelines[edit]

Can you tell Lucy-marie they cannot just be ignored please? She seems to think otherwise. One Night In Hackney 21:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I am invoking the "common sence" section in my opinon I made common sence edits to my comments.--Lucy-marie 22:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Common sense does not generally involve changing a sentence to one that means something else entirely in my opinion, and I would appreciate a clarification from Chrislk02 please. One Night In Hackney 22:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Re:G8 disagreement[edit]

Perhaps the following information from OFFICIAL web pages will shed some light on this dispute. All of the information is easily available by following links from the appropriate Wikipedia articles.

The Official site for the 1998 Summit ([32]), under the heading "G8 Structure: an informal club" states that "The G8 is an informal organisation, with no rules or permanent Secretariat staff." (Meaning it has NO members.) From the title page, follow the link to Participating governments: ([33]) and you find a list of countries, and the European Commission.

The Official site for the 2001 Summit ([34]) clearly includes the EU flag at the top of the page. Following the Fact file link to [35] we can read that "Since 1975, the heads of state or government of the major industrial democracies have been meeting annually........ The six countries at the first Summit, held at Rambouillet, France in November 1975, were France, the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and Italy. They were joined by Canada at the San Juan, Puerto Rico Summit of 1976, and by the European Community at the London Summit of 1977." (my emphasis).

On a related point, Lucy-marie has edited the following two pages (at least) to remove mention of the European Commission under the heading of "Leaders at the Summit": 24th G8 summit and 25th G8 summit. This is blatantly wrong even if the European Commission is not a member, since its leader WAS at the summits in question. Emeraude 22:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Can you provide any statment saying the EU has been admitted as a member such as for russia and canada?--Lucy-marie 22:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The G8 itself says it has no members, obviously you missed Emeraude play his trump card. One Night In Hackney 22:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Has she removed them since I have warned her (after i got invovled with the dispute)? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

No, I wasn't suggesting she had. They were removed earlier in the row on 21 Feb, with no reason given on the relevant discussion pages. I mentioned it merely as an example of how Lucy-marie has conducted this debate. Emeraude 00:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Line of people[edit]

Just to let you know, there is a line of people who will be ready to nominate when the time comes, lol. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I know, they're all on my talk page shoving Barnstars down my throat! Anyway, as I've said elsewhere, I have no particular desire to be an administrator – it would bring me into contact with those parts of the project that I do not appreciate (including the events that are sometimes collectively referred to as "drama", which seem to be an unnecessary but problematic issue right now) – Qxz 22:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I feel you! There is a userbox somewhere that states, "This user is not an administrator nor desires to become one." You might want to post that on your userpage and your talk page. If you are adverse to the barnstars, there is also a no-barnstar zone sign if you would like to prevent getting barstars. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 22:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Im sorry I just find it easy to delete my posts after reading them that way it stands out if i have a message. I had read yours and i didnt need it after i read it so i deleted it. My only porpose here is to help watch the pages that my clases use for the best of my fellow students. I am only here because 2 months ago I visited a site and saw that someone had swore all over a public page and it wasnt fixed till the next day so thats wy. But Justin Eller deleted a link on my userpage to my non-profit webpage and said it was a spam link. But it wasnt. Its a link for my school. Its Upick radio. Its newly developed with DJs from my school.

Please contact me A.S.A.P

DUDE!!![edit]

Its not for promotional porposes its for my school!!!!! No one can listen unless they are a student at my school. You got it all backwards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cfinn06 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.