In mathematics, an ultrametric space is a metric space in which the triangle inequality is strengthened to . Sometimes the associated metric is also called a non-Archimedean metric or super-metric.

Formal definition

An ultrametric on a set M is a real-valued function

(where denote the real numbers), such that for all x, y, zM:

  1. d(x, y) ≥ 0;
  2. d(x, y) = d(y, x) (symmetry);
  3. d(x, x) = 0;
  4. if d(x, y) = 0 then x = y;
  5. d(x, z) ≤ max {d(x, y), d(y, z)} (strong triangle inequality or ultrametric inequality).

An ultrametric space is a pair (M, d) consisting of a set M together with an ultrametric d on M, which is called the space's associated distance function (also called a metric).

If d satisfies all of the conditions except possibly condition 4 then d is called an ultrapseudometric on M. An ultrapseudometric space is a pair (M, d) consisting of a set M and an ultrapseudometric d on M.[1]

In the case when M is an Abelian group (written additively) and d is generated by a length function (so that ), the last property can be made stronger using the Krull sharpening to:

with equality if .

We want to prove that if , then the equality occurs if . Without loss of generality, let us assume that . This implies that . But we can also compute . Now, the value of cannot be , for if that is the case, we have contrary to the initial assumption. Thus, , and . Using the initial inequality, we have and therefore .

Properties

In the triangle on the right, the two bottom points x and y violate the condition d(x, y) ≤ max{d(x, z), d(y, z)}.

From the above definition, one can conclude several typical properties of ultrametrics. For example, for all , at least one of the three equalities or or holds. That is, every triple of points in the space forms an isosceles triangle, so the whole space is an isosceles set.

Defining the (open) ball of radius centred at as , we have the following properties:

Proving these statements is an instructive exercise.[2] All directly derive from the ultrametric triangle inequality. Note that, by the second statement, a ball may have several center points that have non-zero distance. The intuition behind such seemingly strange effects is that, due to the strong triangle inequality, distances in ultrametrics do not add up.

Examples

Applications

References

  1. ^ Narici & Beckenstein 2011, pp. 1–18.
  2. ^ "Ultrametric Triangle Inequality". Stack Exchange.
  3. ^ Osipov, Gutkin (2013), "Clustering of periodic orbits in chaotic systems", Nonlinearity, 26 (26): 177–200, Bibcode:2013Nonli..26..177G, doi:10.1088/0951-7715/26/1/177.
  4. ^ Leclerc, Bruno (1981), "Description combinatoire des ultramétriques", Centre de Mathématique Sociale. École Pratique des Hautes Études. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines (in French) (73): 5–37, 127, MR 0623034.
  5. ^ Mezard, M; Parisi, G; and Virasoro, M: SPIN GLASS THEORY AND BEYOND, World Scientific, 1986. ISBN 978-9971-5-0116-7
  6. ^ Rammal, R.; Toulouse, G.; Virasoro, M. (1986). "Ultrametricity for physicists". Reviews of Modern Physics. 58 (3): 765–788. Bibcode:1986RvMP...58..765R. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.58.765. Retrieved 20 June 2011.
  7. ^ Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Second English Edition. Developments in Environmental Modelling 20. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  8. ^ Benzi, R.; Biferale, L.; Trovatore, E. (1997). "Ultrametric Structure of Multiscale Energy Correlations in Turbulent Models". Physical Review Letters. 79 (9): 1670–1674. arXiv:chao-dyn/9705018. Bibcode:1997PhRvL..79.1670B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1670. S2CID 53120932.
  9. ^ Papadimitriou, Fivos (2013). "Mathematical modelling of land use and landscape complexity with ultrametric topology". Journal of Land Use Science. 8 (2): 234–254. doi:10.1080/1747423x.2011.637136. ISSN 1747-423X. S2CID 121927387.

Bibliography

Further reading