The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by The Bushranger One ping only 07:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Seward Highway

[edit]

Seward Highway, while in the Chugach National Forest

Created/expanded by Awardgive (talk). Self nom at 09:04, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

  • Sorry. I just assumed that everyone kept their DYK noms on their watch list, now that we are able to do that. Cbl62 (talk) 20:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Disputed sentence removed. How about ALT1? -- Esemono (talk) 07:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

ALT1... that the Seward Highway is viewed as a highway that is important to defense policy and which provides defense access, continuity and emergency capabilities for defense purposes?

  • Article is reasonably well sourced (some of the route description has to be assumed to be sourced to maps).
I'm unimpressed by ALT1 -- it describes a highway classification that applies to many highways in the U.S., and the article doesn't provide contextual details on why this road is important for defense policy, etc.
Like Cbl62, thought that "no land connection until this road was built" would make a good hook, until I learned that the railroad existed earlier (I edited the article to include that information).
Although the details of the mileage are in question, it's clear from maps that most of the distance is in the national forest. Accordingly, I recommend the following revision to the original hook:

I'm fine with alt 2. Still not terribly interesting but at least it avoids the other problems noted above. Cbl62 (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2012 (UTC)