- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:51, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Referencing
Person-Situation Debate
[edit]- ... that the Person-Situation Debate caused psychological researchers to doubt that people have personalities?
Created/expanded by Linp11 (talk). Self nom at 19:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. No images to check for copyrights on. Formatted correctly is hook.
Article is not completely support by inline citations. Article reads like an academic paper, not an Encyclopedia entry. Person-Situation Debate isn't even defined in the article. Take a look at Attachment disorder, Beck Depression Inventory, Consciousness to begin to get an idea of the style required. The lack of definition. The unclear, not logical organisation creates WP:NPOV issues. Selection of sources for critiquing things also creates WP:NPOV issues.
Hook is not supported by article text. Do not see word doubt anywhere in article. psychological researchers is vague. --LauraHale (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
NPOV issues and fact tags need addressing. --LauraHale (talk) 04:56, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Changes might have been made, but the article is not completely supported by inline citations. I believe it has WP:MEDRS sourcing problems. Even with a review by classmates, these problems were not fixed. I can't see them ever getting fixed by the nominator or the class. --LauraHale (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)